Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges and Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.04417 v2 pith:Y7O63VBO submitted 2021-08-10 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CR
keywords ppmlresearchprivacy-preservingchallengesmodelapplicationsattacksdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being adopted in a wide variety of application domains. Usually, a well-performing ML model relies on a large volume of training data and high-powered computational resources. Such a need for and the use of huge volumes of data raise serious privacy concerns because of the potential risks of leakage of highly privacy-sensitive information; further, the evolving regulatory environments that increasingly restrict access to and use of privacy-sensitive data add significant challenges to fully benefiting from the power of ML for data-driven applications. A trained ML model may also be vulnerable to adversarial attacks such as membership, attribute, or property inference attacks and model inversion attacks. Hence, well-designed privacy-preserving ML (PPML) solutions are critically needed for many emerging applications. Increasingly, significant research efforts from both academia and industry can be seen in PPML areas that aim toward integrating privacy-preserving techniques into ML pipeline or specific algorithms, or designing various PPML architectures. In particular, existing PPML research cross-cut ML, systems and applications design, as well as security and privacy areas; hence, there is a critical need to understand state-of-the-art research, related challenges and a research roadmap for future research in PPML area. In this paper, we systematically review and summarize existing privacy-preserving approaches and propose a Phase, Guarantee, and Utility (PGU) triad based model to understand and guide the evaluation of various PPML solutions by decomposing their privacy-preserving functionalities. We discuss the unique characteristics and challenges of PPML and outline possible research directions that leverage as well as benefit multiple research communities such as ML, distributed systems, security and privacy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Combating Knowledge Corruption in Agent Systems: A Byzantine-Tolerant Secure Collaborative RAG Framework

    cs.CR 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    SecureCollaRAG filters poisoned RAG documents with dynamic GNN credibility scoring, but its formal proof depends on an assumed cluster separation that the introduced ATA attack is designed to violate.

  2. A User-Centric, Privacy-Preserving, and Verifiable Ecosystem for Personal Data Management and Utilization

    cs.CR 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A decentralized personal-data architecture uses secure enclaves and federated learning so service providers can compute on user data without accessing it.

  3. Joint Partitioning and Placement of Foundation Models for Real-Time Edge AI

    cs.DC 2025-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A framework for runtime re-splitting and re-placement of foundation model layers across edge nodes is proposed, but its claimed latency gains are inherited from prior work rather than measured.

Pith tools