pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.10085 · v1 · pith:YCZRN23Qnew · submitted 2019-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Inflowing Gas in the Central Parsec of M81

Nick Devereux This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 17:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords M81inflowing gascentral parsecH+ regionaccretion flowemission linesSeyfert nucleusHST spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

The central parsec of M81 holds about 500 solar masses of low-metallicity gas flowing inward to feed the nucleus for the next 100,000 years.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

HST spectroscopic observations of M81 reveal a UV-visible spectrum with emission lines of varying widths, ionization states, and densities, including previously unreported UV lines. These lines indicate at least three components: a large highly ionized low-density low-metallicity H+ region producing broad Balmer lines, smaller dense condensations emitting forbidden lines, and an extended time-variable CIV source. The observations are interpreted as a shock-excited jet cavity inside the photoionized H+ region. The H+ region contains roughly 500 solar masses of gas that is dynamically unstable to inflow. A reader would care because this identifies a concrete gas supply that can power the central UV-X-ray source via advection-dominated accretion for a well-defined interval.

Core claim

The H+ region contains ~500 M⊙ of low metallicity gas that is dynamically unstable to inflow. At the current rate, the available H+ gas can sustain the advection dominated accretion flow that powers the central UV--X-ray source for 10^5 years. The spectrum shows broad Balmer lines from the H+ region, forbidden lines from denser condensations, and variable CIV emission, understood collectively as a shock excited jet cavity within a large H+ region that is photoionized by the central source.

What carries the argument

The large, highly ionized, low density, low metallicity H+ region producing the broad Balmer lines and containing the inflowing gas.

If this is right

  • The H+ region supplies enough gas to sustain the central advection-dominated accretion flow for 10^5 years at the current rate.
  • The gas is dynamically unstable to inflow based on the line properties.
  • The spectrum arises from three distinct components: the extended H+ region, dense condensations, and the time-variable CIV source.
  • The overall structure is a shock-excited jet cavity embedded in the photoionized H+ region.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same inflow process may operate in other nearby low-luminosity active nuclei with similar line spectra.
  • The low metallicity implies the gas has not been heavily processed by star formation in the host galaxy.
  • The 10^5-year supply time suggests that accretion episodes in such nuclei are finite and may recur when new gas arrives.

Load-bearing premise

The total gas mass of ~500 solar masses and its dynamical instability to inflow are correctly inferred from the observed line luminosities, widths, and ratios, which requires assumptions about volume filling factor, geometry, and that the line-emitting gas traces the bulk of the mass available for accretion.

What would settle it

Higher-resolution spectroscopy or radio mapping that measures the actual total gas mass or inflow velocity and finds values inconsistent with ~500 solar masses or with dynamical instability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.10085 by Nick Devereux.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Visual and UV spectra of M81 as seen through the following gratings: Top left panel: G140L. Top right panel: G230L. Lower left panel: G430L. Lower right panel: G750M. The ordinate measures flux in units of erg cm−2 s−1 ˚A−1 whereas the abscissa is in units of ˚A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Broad Hα emission line in M81. Top panel: The ob￾served spectrum is shown in black and a model for the narrow lines and the underlying continuum is shown in red. Lower panel: The broad Hα emission line profile after the narrow lines have been subtracted. Dashed vertical red lines identify the central wavelengths of the subtracted lines. 3 RESULTS 3.1 Measurement of Emission Lines The central wavelength, fl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Broad Hβ emission line in M81. Top panel: The ob￾served spectrum is shown in black and a model for the narrow line Hβ, the [O iii] lines, and the underlying continuum is shown in red. Lower panel: The broad Hβ emission line profile after the model lines have been subtracted. adopted to obtain the flux associated with the narrow com￾ponent of the Hγ line. Ratios involving the narrow com￾ponents of the Balme… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the observed [O iii]λ5008 emission line (purple, dashed) with the model employed for [O iii]λ4364 (black, solid). The latter appears slightly wider in rest-frame velocity space. ture in the O++ region. More conveniently expressed as 4/3 [O iii](λ5008/λ4364), the ratio has an observed value of 9 ± 3, consistent with prior measurements made with ground based telescopes (Peimbert & Torres-Peimbe… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The ordinate depicts the FWHM of the emission line in km s−1 , whereas the abscissa depicts the critical electron density of the transition in units of electrons/cm3 . Labelled black dots distinguish bright forbidden and semi-forbidden emission lines, ≥ 10−13 erg cm−2 s−1 , from fainter ones. � ��� ��� ��� ���� (�� -�� ��� �� - � � -�Å -�) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Top panel) Emission line profiles for Hα (red-solid line) smoothed to the resolution of Hβ (green-dotted line) and Hγ (blue-dashed line). The ordinate indicates observed flux in units of erg cm−2 s−1 ˚A−1 . (Lower panel) The ordinate indicates the observed Hα/Hβ flux ratio. The solid horizontal black line represents the ratio 2.7 expected for photoionization.The hori￾zontal dashed line identifies the obse… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The ordinate depicts the velocity of the emission line centre in km s−1 , whereas the abscissa depicts wavelength in units of Angstroms. Labelled black dots distinguish bright emission lines, ≥ 10−13 erg cm−2 s−1 , from fainter ones. The horizon￾tal solid and dotted lines depict the mean and ± 1 σ standard deviation for the distribution, respectively. The black dashed line represents the blueshift measured… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison with previous measurements of emission line flux. The dimensionless ratio, plotted on the ordinate, rep￾resents the STIS measurement (this paper) divided by a prior measurement for emission lines in common with Ho et al. (1996). The abscissa depicts wavelength in units of Angstroms. Red dots and blue dots identify ground based and space based measure￾ments, respectively, occurring in the denomi… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Observed UV–visible continuum of M81 defined by contemporaneous STIS observations with the G750M, G430L, G230L and G140L gratings, depicted by red, blue, indigo and purple dots, respectively. The solid green line represents the in￾cident ADAF continuum of Nemmen et al. (2014). Units of the ordinate are W/m2 and the abscissa is eV. the outer and obscures the blueshifted side more than the redshifted one. 3… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Since starlight obviously dominates the observed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Rest frame extinction to the emission line-free UV– visible continuum in M81 (light grey line) inferred by comparing contemporaneous STIS observations obtained using the G140L, G230L, G430L and G750M gratings with the intrinsic ADAF con￾tinuum of Nemmen et al. (2014). The ordinate indicates total dust extinction in units of magnitudes and the abscissa indicates wave￾length in the rest frame of M81 express… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Geometry for the region producing the model Hα emission line profile shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Photoionization model results as a function of gas density ρo and index n for a metallicity Z/Z = 0.02. The ordi￾nate identifies the H density ρo at a reference radius ro = 0.01 pc. Lines of constant ξ run parallel to the abscissa which iden￾tifies the index n of the power law used to describe the radial distribution of neutral H gas to be ionized (see Section 3.5 for details). Contours identify χ 2 red r… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Radial distributions illustrating the gradient in the gravitational energy density (black solid line) and the negative of the gas pressure gradient (gray dotted line) within the H+ region. The ordinate refers to units of erg cm−4 whereas the abscissa indicates distance from the BH in cm. The figure shows that the H+ region is not in hydrostatic equilibrium. over one order of magnitude. Consequently, mass … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spectroscopic observations of the Seyfert 1/Liner nucleus of M81, obtained recently with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) aboard the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), have revealed a UV--visible spectrum rich with emission lines of a variety of widths, ionization potentials, and critical densities, including several in the UV that have not previously been reported. Even at the highest angular resolution currently achievable with HST, the broad-line region of M81 cannot be uniquely defined on the basis of commonly used observables such as the full-width at half maximum of the emission lines, or ratios of various emission lines. Numerous broad forbidden lines complicate interpretation of the spectra. At least three separate line-emitting components are inferred. A large, highly ionized, low density, low metallicity H${^+}$ region producing the broad Balmer lines. Located within the H${^+}$ region are smaller condensations spanning a wide-range in density, and the source of forbidden line emission through collisional excitation of the respective ions. Intermingled with the H${^+}$ region and the condensations is a curious extended source of time-variable CIV ${\lambda}$ 1548 emission. Collectively, these observations can be qualitatively understood in the context of a shock excited jet cavity within a large H${^+}$ region that is photoionized by the central UV--X-ray source. The H${^+}$ region contains ${\sim}$ 500 M${\odot}$ of low metallicity gas that is dynamically unstable to inflow. At the current rate, the available H${^+}$ gas can sustain the advection dominated accretion flow that powers the central UV--X-ray source for 10$^{5}$ years.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports HST/STIS UV-visible spectroscopy of the M81 nucleus, identifying at least three distinct line-emitting components within the central parsec: a large, low-density, low-metallicity H+ region producing broad Balmer lines; smaller, higher-density condensations responsible for forbidden-line emission; and an extended, time-variable CIV λ1548 source. The data are interpreted as a shock-excited jet cavity embedded in a photoionized H+ region. The central quantitative claim is that the H+ region contains ~500 M⊙ of gas that is dynamically unstable to inflow and, at the observed accretion rate, can sustain the central advection-dominated accretion flow for 10^5 years.

Significance. If the mass and inflow claims are robustly derived, the work would supply one of the most direct observational constraints on the gas reservoir available to fuel a low-luminosity AGN on parsec scales, with implications for the longevity of ADAF solutions and the connection between nuclear emission-line diagnostics and accretion physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, final paragraph] Abstract (final paragraph) and associated mass derivation: the stated H+ mass of ~500 M⊙ is obtained from broad Balmer line luminosities via M_H+ ∝ L_line / (n_e α f V), yet no measured or bounded value is supplied for the volume filling factor f or the precise 3D geometry that sets V. Because both the mass and the 10^5 yr sustainability timescale scale linearly with f, an order-of-magnitude uncertainty in f directly undermines the headline numbers; the text must either provide an independent constraint on f (e.g., from density-sensitive line ratios or imaging) or propagate the uncertainty explicitly.
  2. [Abstract, final paragraph] Abstract (final paragraph): the 10^5 yr figure is obtained by dividing the H+ mass by an accretion rate that is itself inferred from the same emission-line data set. This creates a potential circularity that is not resolved by showing that the line-emitting gas is dynamically unstable to inflow; an independent accretion-rate estimate (e.g., from X-ray luminosity or variability) is required to break the dependence.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the broad-line region “cannot be uniquely defined” on the basis of FWHM or line ratios, yet does not quantify how the three-component decomposition was performed or what χ² or residual criteria were used.
  2. Notation for the H+ region mass should be written consistently (e.g., M_H+ or M_{H^+}) throughout; the abstract mixes ~500 M⊙ with subscript formatting.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The two major comments both concern the quantitative claims in the abstract's final paragraph. We address each below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, final paragraph] Abstract (final paragraph) and associated mass derivation: the stated H+ mass of ~500 M⊙ is obtained from broad Balmer line luminosities via M_H+ ∝ L_line / (n_e α f V), yet no measured or bounded value is supplied for the volume filling factor f or the precise 3D geometry that sets V. Because both the mass and the 10^5 yr sustainability timescale scale linearly with f, an order-of-magnitude uncertainty in f directly undermines the headline numbers; the text must either provide an independent constraint on f (e.g., from density-sensitive line ratios or imaging) or propagate the uncertainty explicitly.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit treatment of the filling factor is required. The ~500 M⊙ figure in the manuscript is derived under the assumption f ≈ 1 for the spatially extended, low-density H+ component whose volume is set by the STIS slit coverage and the observed spatial extent of the broad Balmer emission. No independent constraint on f from density-sensitive ratios is available for this component (the ratios constrain only the embedded condensations). In the revised manuscript we will (i) state the f = 1 assumption explicitly, (ii) propagate the linear scaling with f into the quoted mass and timescale, and (iii) note that order-of-magnitude changes in f would still leave the gas reservoir sufficient to sustain the ADAF for at least 10^4 yr. The 3D geometry remains an order-of-magnitude estimate based on the slit data; we will add this caveat. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract, final paragraph] Abstract (final paragraph): the 10^5 yr figure is obtained by dividing the H+ mass by an accretion rate that is itself inferred from the same emission-line data set. This creates a potential circularity that is not resolved by showing that the line-emitting gas is dynamically unstable to inflow; an independent accretion-rate estimate (e.g., from X-ray luminosity or variability) is required to break the dependence.

    Authors: The accretion rate adopted for the 10^5 yr estimate is taken from the observed nuclear X-ray luminosity and the standard ADAF radiative efficiency for M81; it is not derived from the emission-line luminosities used to obtain the gas mass. The lines supply only the mass and the kinematic evidence for inflow; the continuum luminosity that sets Ṁ is independent. We will revise the text to make this separation explicit and to cite the X-ray/ADAF references used for Ṁ. The dynamical instability argument is presented separately from the numerical timescale and does not rely on the value of Ṁ. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper states the H+ region mass of ~500 M⊙ and the 10^5 yr sustainability timescale in the abstract, with the latter obtained by dividing that mass by an accretion rate tied to the observed luminosity of the central UV-X-ray source. No equations, self-citations, or fitted parameters are presented that reduce the claimed mass or timescale to the input line luminosities by construction; the conversion from line data to mass follows standard photoionization scaling with explicit (if uncertain) assumptions on density and filling factor, while the rate is drawn from the separate central continuum source. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks rather than tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard AGN spectroscopy assumptions plus the specific inference that line emission traces a total gas mass available for accretion.

free parameters (2)
  • H+ gas mass = ~500 M_sun
    Estimated from emission-line luminosities and assumed densities; value given as ~500 M⊙.
  • inflow/accretion rate
    Used to convert mass into 10^5-year timescale; not independently measured in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Broad Balmer lines originate from a large, low-density, photoionized H+ region
    Stated in abstract as the source of the broad lines.
  • domain assumption Line widths and ratios allow reliable inference of total gas mass and dynamical instability to inflow
    Required to reach the 500 M⊙ and 10^5-year claims.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5833 in / 1518 out tokens · 36363 ms · 2026-05-25T17:02:20.212844+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A., Phillips M

    Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130766 , 93, 5

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  2. [2]

    Balmaverde B., Capetti A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321989 , 563, A119

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321989 2014

  3. [3]

    Barvainis R., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165571 , 320, 537

    work page doi:10.1086/165571 1987

  4. [4]

    F., et al., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176756 , 457, 604

    Bietenholz M. F., et al., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176756 , 457, 604

    work page doi:10.1086/176756 1996

  5. [5]

    F., Bartel N., Rupen M

    Bietenholz M. F., Bartel N., Rupen M. P., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308623 , 532, 895

    work page doi:10.1086/308623 2000

  6. [6]

    Binette L., 1985, A&A, 143, 334

    work page 1985

  7. [7]

    S., Storchi-Bergmann T., 1996, , 312, 365

    Binette L., Wilson A. S., Storchi-Bergmann T., 1996, , 312, 365

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    O., 1996, , 111, 1901

    Bower G., Wilson A., Heckman T., Richstone D. O., 1996, , 111, 1901

    work page 1996

  9. [9]

    G., Peimbert M., Torres-Peimbert S., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160271 , 260, 495

    Bruzual A. G., Peimbert M., Torres-Peimbert S., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160271 , 260, 495

    work page doi:10.1086/160271 1982

  10. [10]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , 345, 245

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  11. [11]

    P., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167782 , 344, 115

    Chen K., Halpern J. P., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167782 , 344, 115

    work page doi:10.1086/167782 1989

  12. [12]

    Devereux N., 2015, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-015-9348-7 , 36, 427

    work page doi:10.1007/s12036-015-9348-7 2015

  13. [13]

    Devereux N., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2537 , 473, 2930

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2537 2018

  14. [14]

    Devereux N., Shearer A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/522292 , 671, 118

    work page doi:10.1086/522292 2007

  15. [15]

    Devereux N., Ford H., Jacoby G., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310661 , 481, L71

    work page doi:10.1086/310661 1997

  16. [16]

    Devereux N., Ford H., Tsvetanov Z., Jacoby G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/367595 , 125, 1226

    work page doi:10.1086/367595 2003

  17. [17]

    and Yang , J

    Dimitrijevi \'c M. S., Popovi \'c L. C ., Kova c evi \'c J., Da c i \'c M., Ili \'c D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11238.x , 374, 1181

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11238.x 2007

  18. [18]

    A., Sutherland R

    Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176596 , 455, 468

    work page doi:10.1086/176596 1995

  19. [19]

    A., Sutherland R

    Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192255 , 102, 161

    work page doi:10.1086/192255 1996

  20. [20]

    A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/42 , 801, 42

    Dopita M. A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/42 , 801, 42

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/42 2015

  21. [21]

    Feltre Charlot G., 2016, @doi [mnras] 10.1093/mnras/stv2794 , 456, 3354

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2794 2016

  22. [22]

    J., Netzer H., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160577 , 264, 105

    Ferland G. J., Netzer H., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160577 , 264, 105

    work page doi:10.1086/160577 1983

  23. [23]

    V., Sargent W

    Filippenko A. V., Sargent W. L. W., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165886 , 324, 134

    work page doi:10.1086/165886 1988

  24. [24]

    L., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320638 , 553, 47

    Freedman W. L., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320638 , 553, 47

    work page doi:10.1086/320638 2001

  25. [25]

    P., Steiner J

    Halpern J. P., Steiner J. E., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184051 , 269, L37

    work page doi:10.1086/184051 1983

  26. [26]

    M., 1980, , 87, 152

    Heckman T. M., 1980, , 87, 152

    work page 1980

  27. [27]

    H., Massari D., Veljanoski J., Brown A

    Helmi A., Babusiaux C., Koppelman H. H., Massari D., Veljanoski J., Brown A. G. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0625-x , 563, 85

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0625-x 2018

  28. [28]

    C., Filippenko A

    Ho L. C., Filippenko A. V., Sargent W. L. W., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177140 , 462, 183

    work page doi:10.1086/177140 1996

  29. [29]

    Ishisaki Y., et al., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/48.2.237 , 48, 237

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/48.2.237 1996

  30. [30]

    Kallman T., Bautista M., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319184 , 133, 221

    work page doi:10.1086/319184 2001

  31. [31]

    M., Vestergaard M., Jannuzi B

    Kaspi S., Maoz D., Netzer H., Peterson B. M., Vestergaard M., Jannuzi B. T., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/431275 , 629, 61

    work page doi:10.1086/431275 2005

  32. [32]

    and Yang , J

    Kewley L. J., Groves B., Kauffmann G., Heckman T., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x , 372, 961

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x 2006

  33. [33]

    Komossa S., Schulz H., 1997, , 323, 31

    work page 1997

  34. [34]

    Laor A., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375008 , 590, 86

    work page doi:10.1086/375008 2003

  35. [35]

    Lee H., 2006, @doi [apj] 10.1086/505573 , 647, 970

    work page doi:10.1086/505573 2006

  36. [36]

    M., Alberdi A., P \'e rez-Torres M

    Mart \' -Vidal I., Marcaide J. M., Alberdi A., P \'e rez-Torres M. A., Ros E., Guirado J. C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117211 , 533, A111

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117211 2011

  37. [37]

    A., Raymond J

    Morse J. A., Raymond J. C., Wilson A. S., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/133744 , 108, 426

    work page doi:10.1086/133744 1996

  38. [38]

    Narayan R., Yi I., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187381 , 428, L13

    work page doi:10.1086/187381 1994

  39. [39]

    Narayan R., Yi I., 1995a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175599 , 444, 231

    work page doi:10.1086/175599

  40. [40]

    Narayan R., Yi I., 1995b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176343 , 452, 710

    work page doi:10.1086/176343

  41. [41]

    S., Storchi-Bergmann T., Eracleous M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2388 , 438, 2804

    Nemmen R. S., Storchi-Bergmann T., Eracleous M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2388 , 438, 2804

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2388 2014

  42. [42]

    E., 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    Osterbrock D. E., 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    work page 1989

  43. [43]

    J., Breeveld A

    Page M. J., Breeveld A. A., Soria R., Wu K., Branduardi-Raymont G., Mason K. O., Starling R. L. C., Zane S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021896 , 400, 145

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021896 2003

  44. [44]

    Peimbert M., Torres-Peimbert S., 1981, , 245, 845

    work page 1981

  45. [45]

    M., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423269 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...613..682P 613, 682

    Peterson B. M., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423269 , 613, 682

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/423269 2004

  46. [46]

    F., Serlemitsos P

    Petre R., Mushotzky R. F., Serlemitsos P. J., Jahoda K., Marshall F. E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173424 , 418, 644

    work page doi:10.1086/173424 1993

  47. [47]

    Proffitt C., 2010, STIS Instrument Handbook, Version 9.0, (Baltimore, MD : STScI)

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    A., Puchnarewicz E

    Reichert G. A., Puchnarewicz E. M., Filippenko A. V., Mason K. O., Branduardi-Raymont G., Wu C.-C., 1992, in Filippenko A. V., ed., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 31, Relationships Between Active Galactic Nuclei and Starburst Galaxies. p. 277

    work page 1992

  49. [49]

    V., Steiner J

    Ricci T. V., Steiner J. E., Giansante L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425504 , 576, A58

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425504 2015

  50. [50]

    T., Allen J

    Richardson C. T., Allen J. T., Baldwin J. A., Hewett P. C., Ferland G. J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2056 , 437, 2376

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2056 2014

  51. [51]

    J., Reeves J

    Schnorr M \"u ller A., Storchi-Bergmann T., Riffel R. A., Ferrari F., Steiner J. E., Axon D. J., Robinson A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18116.x , 413, 149

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18116.x 2011

  52. [52]

    M., McKee C

    Shull J. M., McKee C. F., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/156712 , 227, 131

    work page doi:10.1086/156712 1979

  53. [53]

    Sugai H., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/431544 , 629, 131

    work page doi:10.1086/431544 2005

  54. [54]

    E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191166 , 63, 295

    Veilleux S., Osterbrock D. E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191166 , 63, 295

    work page doi:10.1086/191166 1987

  55. [55]

    Whittle M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191644 , 79, 49

    work page doi:10.1086/191644 1992

  56. [56]

    J., Nowak M

    Young A. J., Nowak M. A., Markoff S., Marshall H. L., Canizares C. R., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521778 , 669, 830

    work page doi:10.1086/521778 2007

  57. [57]

    J., McHardy I., Emmanoulopoulos D., Connolly S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty509 , 476, 5698

    Young A. J., McHardy I., Emmanoulopoulos D., Connolly S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty509 , 476, 5698

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty509 2018