Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

When to Retrieve: Teaching LLMs to Utilize Information Retrieval Effectively

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.19705 v2 pith:YELDUJEE submitted 2024-04-30 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords whenquestioninformationllmsmemoryparametricretrievalanswer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate how Large Language Models (LLMs) can effectively learn to use an off-the-shelf information retrieval (IR) system specifically when additional context is required to answer a given question. Given the performance of IR systems, the optimal strategy for question answering does not always entail external information retrieval; rather, it often involves leveraging the parametric memory of the LLM itself. Prior research has identified this phenomenon in the PopQA dataset, wherein the most popular questions are effectively addressed using the LLM's parametric memory, while less popular ones require IR system usage. Following this, we propose a tailored training approach for LLMs, leveraging existing open-domain question answering datasets. Here, LLMs are trained to generate a special token, <RET>, when they do not know the answer to a question. Our evaluation of the Adaptive Retrieval LLM (Adapt-LLM) on the PopQA dataset showcases improvements over the same LLM under three configurations: (i) retrieving information for all the questions, (ii) using always the parametric memory of the LLM, and (iii) using a popularity threshold to decide when to use a retriever. Through our analysis, we demonstrate that Adapt-LLM is able to generate the <RET> token when it determines that it does not know how to answer a question, indicating the need for IR, while it achieves notably high accuracy levels when it chooses to rely only on its parametric memory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ECoRAG: Evidentiality-guided Compression for Long Context RAG

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Evidentiality-guided, adaptive context compression improves open-domain QA accuracy and token efficiency over standard RAG and prior compressors.

  2. Knowledge Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for LLM-based Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    K-RagRec improves LLM-based recommendation by retrieving and encoding knowledge graph subgraphs as soft prompts, outperforming existing retrieval-augmented LLM recommenders on three datasets.

  3. HF-RAG: Hierarchical Fusion-based RAG with Multiple Sources and Rankers

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    By first fusing multiple retrievers within labeled and unlabeled sources with RRF, then merging z-score normalized lists, HF-RAG improves fact-verification F1 in-domain and out-of-domain.

Pith tools