REVIEW 2 cited by
Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? The Misleading Success of Simulating Social Interactions With LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent advances in large language models (LLM) have enabled richer social simulations, allowing for the study of various social phenomena. However, most recent work has used a more omniscient perspective on these simulations (e.g., single LLM to generate all interlocutors), which is fundamentally at odds with the non-omniscient, information asymmetric interactions that involve humans and AI agents in the real world. To examine these differences, we develop an evaluation framework to simulate social interactions with LLMs in various settings (omniscient, non-omniscient). Our experiments show that LLMs perform better in unrealistic, omniscient simulation settings but struggle in ones that more accurately reflect real-world conditions with information asymmetry. Our findings indicate that addressing information asymmetry remains a fundamental challenge for LLM-based agents.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Bottom-Up Synthesis of Knowledge-Grounded Task-Oriented Dialogues with Iteratively Self-Refined Prompts
BUSY synthesizes e-commerce dialogues by generating knowledge-grounded QA pairs first, then connecting them into conversations, and reports human and LLM ratings that beat a top-down baseline on overall quality and tr...
-
From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agents
A structured survey that categorizes LLM-based social simulation into individual, scenario, and society simulation, with associated methods, benchmarks, and observed trends.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.