Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 132 references

Chemical Abundances in the Nuclear Star Cluster of the Milky Way: alpha-Element Trends and Their Similarities with the Inner Bulge

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Milky Way's nuclear star cluster formed through the same rapid, early star-formation episode as the inner bulge.

desk verdict Careful differential Mg/Ca/Si abundances for nine NSC M giants, but the oxygen-dependent temperature scale and the tiny sample keep the inner-bulge similarity in the 'promising, not proven' category. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04528 v1 pith:YKLPJXM5 submitted 2024-12-05 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

N. Ryde , G. Nandakumar , M. Schultheis , G. Kordopatis , P. di Matteo , M. Haywood , R. Schödel , F. Nogueras-Lara
show 10 more authors
R. M. Rich B. Thorsbro G. Mace O. Agertz A. M. Amarsi J. Kocher M. Molero L. Origlia G. Pagnini E. Spitoni
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords NuclearStarClusteralpha-elementabundancesMgiantsGalacticCenternear-infraredspectroscopystar-formationhistoryMilkyWaybulgechemical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the Milky Way's Nuclear Star Cluster, the compact swarm of stars at the Galactic center, was built by the same rapid and early star-formation event as the inner bulge, not by a recent dominant burst. The evidence comes from magnesium, silicon, and calcium abundances in nine cool red giants in the cluster, measured from high-resolution infrared spectra and compared line-by-line with identically analyzed giants in the solar neighborhood and in the inner bulge. The alpha-element ratios are enhanced at high metallicity and decline steadily as iron abundance rises, tracing the inner-bulge trend and the upper envelope of the metal-rich thin disk. If this reading is right, the cluster's chemical history is inseparable from the Milky Way's inner-disk sequence, and the element patterns of nuclear star clusters in other galaxies could stand in for their hosts' formation histories.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a strictly differential abundance analysis: the nine Nuclear Star Cluster giants and the 50 solar-neighborhood comparison giants were observed with the same high-resolution near-infrared setup, reduced with the same pipeline, and analyzed with the same spectral synthesis, line list, and stellar parameter scale, so systematic errors largely cancel when the trends are compared. The diagnostic quantity is the $\alpha$-to-iron ratio $[\alpha/\mathrm{Fe}]$ as a function of $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]$, where the $\alpha$ elements (Mg, Si, Ca) come predominantly from short-lived massive stars and iron builds up on longer timescales, making the trend a recorder of star-formation rate and duration. The effective temperatures are anchored by OH lines under an assumed oxygen-to-iron trend taken from disk stars, and the paper explicitly notes that an error in this trend would shift temperatures by 50–100 K and $\alpha$ abundances by 0.05–0.10 dex.

What would settle it

Measure oxygen directly, for example through O I lines or asteroseismic temperatures, for the same nine stars and recompute the alpha-element trends; if the revised trends no longer overlap the inner-bulge sequence within the quoted uncertainties, the paper's central comparison fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the alpha-element trends of the Nuclear Star Cluster's M giants, measured as [Mg/Fe], [Si/Fe], and [Ca/Fe] against [Fe/H], are chemically indistinguishable from those of inner-bulge stars: enhanced relative to solar-neighborhood thin-disk stars, steadily decreasing with metallicity, and still declining at supersolar values, with the two most metal-rich stars showing subsolar ratios. The paper argues that this pattern records a high star-formation rate early in the cluster's life, because alpha elements are released quickly by massive stars while iron accumulates over longer timescales from Type Ia supernovae. On that basis it concludes that the NSC population most likely shares the evolutionary history of the inner bulge, that its metal-rich stars formed in situ, and that a dominant star-formation burst around 5 Gyr ago is disfavored.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the oxygen-to-iron trend measured in thick-disk stars also applies to Nuclear Star Cluster stars when their temperatures are set from OH lines; if that assumption is wrong, the temperatures shift by tens of kelvins and the alpha-element abundances by about a tenth of a dex, which is enough to blur the claimed match with the inner bulge.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Nuclear Star Cluster's alpha-element trend is enhanced and declines with metallicity, placing the cluster on the inner-disk chemical sequence shared with the inner bulge.
  • A recent, dominant star-formation burst in the cluster is disfavored in favor of an early, rapid formation epoch.
  • The metal-rich population of the Nuclear Star Cluster most likely formed in situ rather than being assembled from infalling stellar clusters.
  • Chemical abundance patterns of extragalactic nuclear star clusters in Milky Way-type galaxies could serve as proxies for their host galaxies' evolutionary processes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a larger sample confirms that the two most metal-rich stars have genuinely subsolar alpha ratios, the declining trend would constrain how much late iron enrichment from Type Ia supernovae has occurred in the cluster.
  • Independent oxygen abundances for the same stars, from O I lines or asteroseismic temperatures, would directly test the assumed temperature scale and either harden or weaken the similarity with the inner bulge.
  • Chemical-evolution modeling of these nine stars could put an upper limit on the mass fraction of a ~3 Gyr intermediate-age population that would remain hidden in the alpha-element trends.
  • Extending the same differential method to nitrogen, carbon, and odd-Z elements in the Nuclear Star Cluster could separate the early rapid-enrichment signal from later gas infall and sharpen the formation chronology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents high-resolution (R~45,000) IGRINS H+K spectra of nine M giants in the Milky Way's Nuclear Star Cluster, determines Mg, Si, and Ca abundances via spectral synthesis with non-LTE corrections, and compares them differentially with a 50-star solar-neighborhood M-giant sample and an inner-bulge sample analyzed with the same method. It reports enhanced [alpha/Fe] ratios that decrease with [Fe/H], including subsolar values at the two highest metallicities, finds that the NSC trends follow the inner-bulge trend and the high-alpha envelope of the metal-rich thin disk, and interprets this as evidence for an early, rapid star-formation history shared with the inner bulge, disfavoring a recent dominant starburst. The analysis is carefully designed as a differential study, but the small sample size and a key systematic assumption in the temperature scale (the assumed [O/Fe] trend used to set Teff) limit the strength of the conclusions.

Significance. If the reported trends hold, the paper provides an important observational constraint on NSC formation: it links the NSC chemistry to the inner-disk sequence and argues against a dominant recent star-formation burst. The study's strengths are its genuinely differential design (same instrument, wavelength range, resolution, reduction pipeline, line list, and analysis technique for the NSC, solar-neighborhood, and inner-bulge samples), the use of a 50-star control sample to select reliable spectral lines, non-LTE corrections, and the inclusion of dynamical and extinction-based membership checks. The qualitative claim of enhanced, decreasing alpha trends is supported by the nine stars at the 0.05-0.15 dex random-precision level, but the systematic caveats below must be addressed before the conclusion can be accepted as robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3.1, Table 2] The effective-temperature scale is set by OH lines using an assumed [O/Fe] versus [Fe/H] relation for thick-disk stars (Amarsi et al. 2019), and Table 2 lists [O/Fe] values from this same functional form rather than from measured oxygen. The authors state that a 0.2 dex change in the assumed oxygen abundance shifts Teff by 50-100 K and the derived alpha abundances by 0.05-0.10 dex. This is load-bearing because the conclusion that [alpha/Fe] decreases at the highest metallicities and matches the inner-bulge trend depends on this temperature scale: if the true NSC oxygen trend is higher than the thick-disk relation at [Fe/H] > 0.3, the high-metallicity Teff values would be systematically too cool and the derived [alpha/Fe] too high, flattening the decline and weakening the claimed similarity. Since the inner-bulge sample (Nandakumar et al. 2024b) was analyzed with the same assumption, a shared systematic could produce apparent agreement rather than a real chemical similarity. The quoted 0.05-0.15 dex random uncertainties (Section 4.1) do not include this effect. Please re-derive Teff and [alpha/Fe] under several alternative [O/Fe] relations (e.g., thin-disk, flat, or a relation allowed by the NSC data) and show that the decreasing trend and the inner-bulge similarity persist, or provide an independent Teff anchor.
  2. [Section 4.2, Figure 7] The claim that 'the NSC [alpha/Fe] trend shows a clear and steady decrease with increasing metallicity, with the two most metal-rich stars displaying subsolar ratios' rests on only two stars at [Fe/H] ~ 0.42 and 0.48 (Feld31 and Feld84), while the polynomial fit in the right panel of Figure 7 explicitly excludes these same two stars because the solar-neighborhood sample has no counterparts there. With nine stars total and two carrying the 'subsolar at high metallicity' feature, the statistical weight of this feature is very small. Please report the significance of the decreasing trend with and without these two stars, and show their [alpha/Fe] values with the systematic uncertainties from the oxygen-trend assumption included; if the subsolar values are within 1-sigma of solar, the conclusions in Sections 5 and 6 should be correspondingly softened.
  3. [Section 4.2, Ca lines] For calcium, the K-band lines are discarded after showing systematic discrepancies with the H-band lines, and the final [Ca/Fe] trend is based on only three H-band lines in 'quite blended regions.' The text states that the K-band lines give abundances 'systematically and significantly higher than expected' at high metallicity, so the decreasing Ca trend is partly a consequence of this line-selection choice. Since Ca is one of the three elements in the mean alpha trend, please quantify how the K-band lines would change the [Ca/Fe] trend and the mean [alpha/Fe] trend, and justify the selection by showing the line-by-line comparison rather than only describing it.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] The bibliography entry 'Kocher, J. 2024, Title' is an incomplete placeholder and must be filled in.
  2. [Section 1] There are minor typographical errors: 'Galacitc' should be 'Galactic' and 'analaysed' should be 'analysed.'
  3. [Section 3.3.1] The sentence 'A lowering of the assumed oxygen abundance ... is found to result to systematically lower temperatures' should read 'results in.'
  4. [Section 4.2] The statement that H-band lines are expected to have lower S/N than several potentially useful K-band lines is in tension with the subsequent statement that the K-band lines show larger scatter; please clarify that the issue is not S/N but systematic offsets.
  5. [Figure 7 caption] The caption should explicitly state, as the text does, that the two most metal-rich NSC stars are excluded from the polynomial fit because there are no solar-neighborhood counterparts at those metallicities.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: alpha abundances are measured from independent Mg/Si/Ca lines, and the assumed oxygen trend is a stated systematic that does not define the reported trends.

full rationale

The central claim—that NSC M giants show declining, enhanced [alpha/Fe] trends similar to the inner bulge—is an observational result derived from spectral synthesis fits to Mg, Si, and Ca lines (Section 3.4, Figures 4–6), not from the conclusion itself. The comparison samples (solar neighborhood, inner bulge) were observed and analyzed with the same instrument, line list, and stellar-parameter method, making the comparison differential and systematics-cancelling rather than circular. The one genuinely load-bearing assumption is the [O/Fe]–[Fe/H] relation used to set Teff from OH lines (Section 3.3.1); the paper explicitly states that 'a weakness of the method is the assumption of the oxygen trend versus metallicity' and quantifies the effect as 0.2 dex in O leading to 50–100 K in Teff and 0.05–0.10 dex in alpha. This is a systematic uncertainty, not a circular reduction: the alpha abundances are not defined in terms of the assumed O trend, and the adopted thick-disk O trend is conservative in the sense that lowering the assumed O (moving toward a thin-disk assumption) would raise the derived alpha abundances, so the reported enhancement is not manufactured by the assumption. The decreasing alpha trend is also not produced by the assumption, since the assumed O trend declines with [Fe/H] and would tend to boost high-metallicity alphas, flattening rather than creating the observed decrease. The iterative check described in Section 3.3.1 (evaluating the O assumption against derived alpha trends) is a self-consistency loop, but it is not used to define the reported trends, and the paper openly labels the assumption a weakness. Self-citations to Nandakumar et al. (2023, 2024a, 2024b) are method and comparison references from the same group, but the method has external validation (e.g., asteroseismic gravity checks) and the inner-bulge sample is an independent dataset analyzed consistently, so the self-citations are not load-bearing circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported. Overall circularity score: 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed [O/Fe] versus [Fe/H] trend from Amarsi et al. (2019), the MARCS model grid and non-LTE corrections, the line list selection, and the membership determination. No invented entities are introduced. The free parameter is the oxygen trend assumption, which shifts the alpha abundances by 0.05-0.10 dex if varied by 0.2 dex.

free parameters (1)
  • [O/Fe] versus [Fe/H] relation (assumed oxygen trend) = Amarsi et al. (2019) thick disk relation
    The effective temperature scale is set by OH lines, which depend on oxygen abundance. The assumed [O/Fe] trend is taken from thick disk stars in the solar neighborhood. A 0.2 dex change in assumed oxygen shifts Teff by 50-100 K and alpha abundances by 0.05-0.10 dex (Section 3.3.1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption MARCS 1D stellar atmosphere models with non-LTE corrections for C, N, O, Mg, Si, Ca, and Fe are accurate for M giants in the NSC.
    The spectral synthesis uses MARCS models and non-LTE grids from Amarsi et al. (2020, 2022); any model inadequacies would systematically affect the derived abundances.
  • domain assumption The recommended line list from Nandakumar et al. (2023, 2024a) is appropriate for M giants, and the excluded Ca K-band lines are unreliable at high metallicity.
    The choice of lines determines the derived abundances; the K-band Ca lines were excluded post hoc because of unexplained high-metallicity discrepancies.
  • ad hoc to paper The [O/Fe] versus [Fe/H] relation for thick disk stars applies to the NSC stars.
    The Teff scale depends on assumed oxygen; if the NSC stars have a different oxygen trend, the alpha abundances would shift by 0.05-0.10 dex (Section 3.3.1).
  • domain assumption The targets are genuine NSC members.
    Membership is based on reddening (H-K > 1.8), DIB strengths, and orbital integration with AGAMA; if any stars are foreground, the trends would be contaminated.
  • domain assumption Yonsei-Yale isochrones provide reliable surface gravities for old, low-mass M giants.
    log g is derived from YY isochrones with Teff and [Fe/H]; tests with PARSEC, MIST, and BaSTI isochrones show consistency within 0.1 dex.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chemical Abundances in the Nuclear Star Cluster of the Milky Way: alpha-Element Trends and Their Similarities with the Inner Bulge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YKLPJXM5

@misc{pith2026241204528,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chemical Abundances in the Nuclear Star Cluster of the Milky Way: alpha-Element Trends and Their Similarities with the Inner Bulge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YKLPJXM5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04528}
}
read the original abstract

A chemical characterization of the Galactic Center is essential for understanding its formation and structural evolution. Trends of alpha-elements, such as Mg, Si, and Ca, serve as powerful diagnostic tools, offering insights into star-formation rates and gas-infall history. However, high extinction has previously hindered such studies. In this study, we present a detailed chemical abundance analysis of M giants in the Milky Way's Nuclear Star Cluster (NSC), focusing on alpha-element trends with metallicity. High-resolution, near-infrared spectra were obtained using the IGRINS spectrograph on the Gemini South telescope for nine M giants. Careful selection of spectral lines, based on a solar-neighborhood control sample of 50 M giants, was implemented to minimize systematic uncertainties. Our findings show enhanced alpha-element abundances in the predominantly metal-rich NSC stars, consistent with trends in the inner bulge. The NSC stars follow the high-[alpha/Fe] envelope seen in the solar vicinity's metal-rich population, indicating a high star-formation rate. The alpha-element trends decrease with increasing metallicity, also at the highest metallicities. Our results suggest the NSC population likely shares a similar evolutionary history with the inner bulge, challenging the idea of a recent dominant star formation burst. This connection between the NSC and the inner-disk sequence suggests that the chemical properties of extragalactic NSCs of Milky Way type galaxies could serve as a proxy for understanding the host galaxies' evolutionary processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04528 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. GALACTICNUCLEUS JHKs image of the Milky Way’s NSC (Nogueras-Lara et al. 2018, 2019) showing the 9 stars for which we have obtained spectra, marked by white small circles. The image scale is 8x8 pc2 and the large white circle indicates the effec￾tive radius of the NSC (∼ 4 pc, or ∼ 100′′), while the position of the supermassive black hole, A∗ , is denoted by a white star in the middle of the image. The directions Eas… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the colour-magnitude diagram of our 9 NSC stars overlaid by the overall population in the NSC. They cover the upper branch of the RGB and a wide (H–K) range. Nogueras-Lara et al. (2021b); Nogueras-Lara (2022) demonstrated that the membership of stars in the NSC can be determined based on their interstellar reddening. Although interstellar reddening is patchy, they show that in statistical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Input parameters versus isochrone-projected ones, for Teff (first column), [Fe/H] (second column) and log g (third column) using the Kordopatis et al. (2023) code. First row shows the projection on PARSEC isochrones, second on MIST, and third on BaSTI (solar scaled). Points far from the diagonal indicate that no isochrones are found close to the input values. Yellow ‘+’ signs are the atmospheric parameters from the … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: [Mg/Fe] versus [Fe/H] for different stellar populations. The Nuclear Star Cluster (NSC) stars are represented by black stars, the inner bulge stars from Nandakumar et al. (2024b) by blue squares, and the solar neighborhood thin-disk stars are depicted by red filled cir…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: [Si/Fe] versus [Fe/H] for different stellar populations: NSC stars (black stars), inner bulge stars (blue squares), thin-disk stars (red circles), and thick-disk stars (orange diamonds). The upper panels display the spectral lines used, with a typical solar neighborhoo…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: [Ca/Fe] versus [Fe/H] for different stellar populations: NSC stars (black stars), inner bulge stars (blue squares), thin-disk stars (red circles), and thick-disk stars (orange diamonds). The upper panels display the spectral lines used, with a typical solar neighborhoo…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Straight mean abundance of the three α elements, Mg, Si, and Ca versus [Fe/H] for the NSC (black), inner-bulge stars located 1 degree North of the Galactic Center (blue), thick-disk (orange), and thin-disk stars (red). Left panel: Scatter plot of the mean α abundances.…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Z., Santos, N

    Adibekyan, V . Z., Santos, N. C., Sousa, S. G., & Israelian, G. 2011, A&A, 535, L11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118240

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118240 2011

  2. [2]

    2021, MNRAS, 503, 5826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab322

    Agertz, O., Renaud, F., Feltzing, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 5826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab322

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab322 2021

  3. [3]

    M., Liljegren, S., & Nissen, P

    Amarsi, A. M., Liljegren, S., & Nissen, P. E. 2022, A&A, 668, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244542

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244542 2022

  4. [4]

    M., Nissen, P

    Amarsi, A. M., Nissen, P. E., & Sk´ulad´ottir, ´A. 2019, A&A, 630, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936265

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936265 2019

  5. [5]

    M., Lind, K., Osorio, Y ., et al

    Amarsi, A. M., Lind, K., Osorio, Y ., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038650

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038650 2020

  6. [6]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 3738, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1683 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A

    Arca-Sedda, M., & Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3738, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1683 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1683 2014

  7. [7]

    2020, MNRAS, 492, 4500, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa140

    Baba, J., & Kawata, D. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 4500, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa140

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa140 2020

  8. [8]

    2017, A&A, 605, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730560 Bijavara Seshashayana, S., J¨onsson, H., D’Orazi, V ., et al

    Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., Gould, A., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730560 Bijavara Seshashayana, S., J¨onsson, H., D’Orazi, V ., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451056

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730560 2017

Show all 132 references
  1. [9]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441

    Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Gerhard, O. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    2012, MNRAS, 427, 127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    2012

  3. [11]

    Brooke, J. S. A., Bernath, P. F., Western, C. M., et al. 2016, JQSRT, 168, 142, doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.07.021

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    1993, ApJ, 415, 616, doi: 10.1086/173189

    Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R. 1993, ApJ, 415, 616, doi: 10.1086/173189

    1993 doi

  5. [13]

    S., Sellgren, K., & Balachandran, S

    Carr, J. S., Sellgren, K., & Balachandran, S. C. 2000, ApJ, 530, 307, doi: 10.1086/308340

    2000 doi

  6. [14]

    K., Gerhard, O., et al

    Chatzopoulos, S., Fritz, T. K., Gerhard, O., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 948, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2452

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    M., et al

    Chen, Z., Do, T., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca8ad

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Cox, N. L. J., Cami, J., Kaper, L., et al. 2014, A&A, 569, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323061

    2014 doi

  9. [17]

    V ., et al

    Cunha, K., Sellgren, K., Smith, V . V ., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1011, doi: 10.1086/521813 da Silva, L., Girardi, L., Pasquini, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 458, 609, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065105 Delgado Mena, E., Moya, A., Adibekyan, V ., et al. 2019, A&A, 624, A78, doi: 10.1051/0...

    2007 doi

  10. [18]

    Demarque, P., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y .-C., & Yi, S. K. 2004, ApJS, 155, 667, doi: 10.1086/424966 Di Matteo, P. 2016, PASA, 33, e027, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2016.11

    2004 doi

  11. [19]

    2018, ApJL, 855, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaaec3

    Do, T., Kerzendorf, W., Konopacky, Q., et al. 2018, ApJL, 855, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaaec3

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    F., et al

    Dong, H., Sch¨odel, R., Williams, B. F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 3617, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1836

    2017 doi

  13. [21]

    2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter, A. 2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    2022, A&A, 662, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142990

    Ebenbichler, A., Postel, A., Przybilla, N., et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142990

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    Cox, N. L. J. 2017, A&A, 600, A129, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630088

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    2014, A&A, 570, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423777

    Feldmeier, A., Neumayer, N., Seth, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423777

    2014 doi

  17. [25]

    2017a, MNRAS, 464, 194, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2339

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Kerzendorf, W., Neumayer, N., et al. 2017a, MNRAS, 464, 194, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2339

    doi

  18. [26]

    2017b, MNRAS, 466, 4040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3377

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Zhu, L., Neumayer, N., et al. 2017b, MNRAS, 466, 4040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3377

    doi

  19. [27]

    2015, A&A, 584, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526336 16

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Neumayer, N., Sch¨odel, R., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526336 16

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 396, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa703

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Kerzendorf, W., Do, T., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 396, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa703

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    2018, A&A, 616, A180, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732509

    Fragkoudi, F., Di Matteo, P., Haywood, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A180, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732509

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    Friske, J. K. S., & Sch¨onrich, R. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.01899, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.01899

    2023 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    K., Chatzopoulos, S., Gerhard, O., et al

    Fritz, T. K., Chatzopoulos, S., Gerhard, O., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 44, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/44

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    A., Lee, J.-J., Han, I., et al

    Galazutdinov, G. A., Lee, J.-J., Han, I., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 3099, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx330

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    2024, A&A, 689, A190, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449881

    Gallego-Cano, E., Fritz, T., Sch¨odel, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A190, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449881

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    2020, A&A, 634, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935303

    Gallego-Cano, E., Sch¨odel, R., Nogueras-Lara, F., et al. 2020, A&A, 634, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935303

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    Geballe, T. R. 2016, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, V ol. 728, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 062005, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/728/6/062005

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    R., Najarro, F., Figer, D

    Geballe, T. R., Najarro, F., Figer, D. F., Schlegelmilch, B. W., & de La Fuente, D. 2011, Nature, 479, 200, doi: 10.1038/nature10527

    2011 doi

  29. [37]

    A., Mucciarelli, A., Origlia, L., et al

    Gonzalez, O. A., Mucciarelli, A., Origlia, L., et al. 2020, The Messenger, 180, 18, doi: 10.18727/0722-6691/5196

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    I., Read, J

    Gray, E. I., Read, J. I., Taylor, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.19286, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.19286

    2024 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Grevesse, N., Asplund, M., & Sauval, A. J. 2007, SSRv, 130, 105, doi: 10.1007/s11214-007-9173-7

    2007 doi

  32. [40]

    2017, MNRAS, 472, 3637, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2201 Guerc ¸o, R., Smith, V

    Grisoni, V ., Spitoni, E., Matteucci, F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 3637, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2201 Guerc ¸o, R., Smith, V . V ., Cunha, K., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 2801, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2393

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

    Gully-Santiago, M., Wang, W., Deen, C., & Jaffe, D. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 8450, Modern Technologies in Space- and Ground-based Telescopes and Instrumentation II, ed. R. Navarro, C. R. Cunningham, & E. Prieto...

    2012 doi

  34. [42]

    2008, A&A, 486, 951

    Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., Eriksson, K., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 951

    2008

  35. [43]

    2022, ApJS, 262, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7567

    Hamano, S., Kobayashi, N., Kawakita, H., et al. 2022, ApJS, 262, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7567

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    Han, J.-Y ., Yuk, I.-S., Ko, K., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    2012

  37. [45]

    8550, Optical Systems Design 2012, ed

    Series, V ol. 8550, Optical Systems Design 2012, ed. D. G

    2012

  38. [46]

    Smith, J.-L. M. Tissot, L. Mazuray, T. E. Kidger, F. Wyrowski, J. M. Raynor, R. Wartmann, S. David, A. Erdmann, A. P. Wood, P. Ben´ıtez, & M. C. de la Fuente, 85501B, doi: 10.1117/12.981169

    doi

  39. [47]

    P., Seth, A., Cappellari, M., & Quinn, T

    Hartmann, M., Debattista, V . P., Seth, A., Cappellari, M., & Quinn, T. R. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 2697, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19659.x

    2011

  40. [48]

    2018, A&A, 618, A78, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731363

    Haywood, M., Di Matteo, P., Lehnert, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A78, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731363

    2018 doi

  41. [49]

    D., Katz, D., & G´omez, A

    Haywood, M., Di Matteo, P., Lehnert, M. D., Katz, D., & G´omez, A. 2013, A&A, 560, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321397

    2013 doi

  42. [50]

    D., Barnes, A

    Henshaw, J. D., Barnes, A. T., Battersby, C., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y . Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 83, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.11223

    2023 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    L., Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., et al

    Hidalgo, S. L., Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 125, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab158

    2018 doi

  44. [52]

    A., Hasselquist, S., Shetrone, M., et al

    Holtzman, J. A., Hasselquist, S., Shetrone, M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 125, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad4f9

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  46. [54]

    S., et al

    Jeong, U., Chun, M.-Y ., Oh, J. S., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    2014

  47. [55]

    9154, High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy VI, ed

    Series, V ol. 9154, High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy VI, ed. A. D. Holland & J. Beletic, 91541X, doi: 10.1117/12.2055589

    doi

  48. [56]

    I., Rich, R

    Johnson, C. I., Rich, R. M., Young, M. D., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 2357, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2393

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    I., Rich, R

    Johnson, C. I., Rich, R. M., Simion, I. T., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 1469, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1840 J¨onsson, H., Allende Prieto, C., Holtzman, J. A., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad4f5

    2022 doi

  50. [58]

    I., Marchetti, T., et al

    Joyce, M., Johnson, C. I., Marchetti, T., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb692

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    Kordopatis, G., Wyse, R. F. G., Gilmore, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526258

    2015 doi

  52. [60]

    J., et al

    Kordopatis, G., Schultheis, M., McMillan, P. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244283

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    Launhardt, R., Zylka, R., & Mezger, P. G. 2002, A&A, 384, 112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020017

    2002 doi

  54. [62]

    2017, Igrins/Plp 2.2.0,

    Lee, J.-J., Gullikson, K., & Kaplan, K. 2017, Igrins/Plp 2.2.0,

    2017

  55. [63]

    Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.845059

    doi

  56. [64]

    E., Rothman, L

    Li, G., Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., et al. 2015, ApJS, 216, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/216/1/15

    2015 doi

  57. [65]

    J., Chun, S.-H., Hong, S., & Lee, Y .-W

    Lim, D., Koch-Hansen, A. J., Chun, S.-H., Hong, S., & Lee, Y .-W. 2022, A&A, 666, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243877

    2022 doi

  58. [66]

    2019, A&A, 625, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834247

    Lomaeva, M., J¨onsson, H., Ryde, N., Schultheis, M., & Thorsbro, B. 2019, A&A, 625, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834247

    2019 doi

  59. [67]

    2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    Mace, G., Sokal, K., Lee, J.-J., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    2018

  60. [68]

    10702, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, ed

    Series, V ol. 10702, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, ed. C. J. Evans, L. Simard, & H. Takami, 107020Q, doi: 10.1117/12.2312345

    doi

  61. [69]

    K., et al

    Manea, C., Hawkins, K., Ness, M. K., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.15257. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15257 17

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    2012, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Mastrobuono-Battisti, A., & Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R. 2012, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 453, Advances in Computational Astrophysics: Methods, Tools, and Outcome, ed. R. Capuzzo-Dolcetta, M. Limongi, & A. Tornamb`e, 237, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1109.6620

    2012 doi arXiv

  63. [71]

    2011, Nature, 477, 188, doi: 10.1038/nature10359

    Matsunaga, N., Kawadu, T., Nishiyama, S., et al. 2011, Nature, 477, 188, doi: 10.1038/nature10359

    2011 doi

  64. [72]

    2021, A&A Rv, 29, 5, doi: 10.1007/s00159-021-00133-8

    Matteucci, F. 2021, A&A Rv, 29, 5, doi: 10.1007/s00159-021-00133-8

    2021 doi

  65. [73]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 5363, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1647

    Matteucci, F., Grisoni, V ., Spitoni, E., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 5363, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1647

    2019 doi

  66. [74]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 5534, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1118

    Matteucci, F., Vasini, A., Grisoni, V ., & Schultheis, M. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 5534, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1118

    2020 doi

  67. [75]

    1997, ARA&A, 35, 503, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.503 Mel´endez, J., Asplund, M., Alves-Brito, A., et al

    McWilliam, A. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 503, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.503 Mel´endez, J., Asplund, M., Alves-Brito, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 484, L21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809398

    1997 doi

  68. [76]

    W., Emerson, J

    Minniti, D., Lucas, P. W., Emerson, J. P., et al. 2010, NewA, 15, 433, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2009.12.002

    2010 doi

  69. [77]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    Moon, B., Wang, W., Park, C., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    2012

  70. [78]

    8450, Modern Technologies in Space- and Ground-based Telescopes and Instrumentation II, ed

    Series, V ol. 8450, Modern Technologies in Space- and Ground-based Telescopes and Instrumentation II, ed. R. Navarro, C. R. Cunningham, & E. Prieto, 845048, doi: 10.1117/12.925702

    doi

  71. [79]

    2023, A&A, 675, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346149

    Nandakumar, G., Ryde, N., Casagrande, L., & Mace, G. 2023, A&A, 675, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346149

    2023 doi

  72. [80]

    2024a, A&A, 684, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348462

    Nandakumar, G., Ryde, N., Forsberg, R., et al. 2024a, A&A, 684, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348462

    doi

  73. [81]

    2018, MNRAS, 478, 4374, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1255

    Nandakumar, G., Ryde, N., Schultheis, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4374, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1255

    2018 doi

  74. [82]

    2024b, ApJ, 964, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad22dc

    Nandakumar, G., Ryde, N., Mace, G., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 964, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad22dc

    doi

  75. [83]

    2012, ApJ, 756, 22, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/22 —

    Ness, M., Freeman, K., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 22, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/22 —. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 836, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts629

    2012 doi

  76. [84]

    2020, A&A Rv, 28, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0

    Neumayer, N., Seth, A., & B¨oker, T. 2020, A&A Rv, 28, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0

    2020 doi

  77. [85]

    2023, A&A, 671, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245374

    Nieuwmunster, N., Nandakumar, G., Spitoni, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245374

    2023 doi

  78. [86]

    2024, A&A, 685, A93, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349000

    Nieuwmunster, N., Schultheis, M., Sormani, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A93, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349000

    2024 doi

  79. [87]

    2006, ApJ, 638, 839, doi: 10.1086/499038

    Nishiyama, S., Nagata, T., Kusakabe, N., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 839, doi: 10.1086/499038

    2006 doi

  80. [88]

    2013, ApJL, 769, L28, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/769/2/L28

    Nishiyama, S., Yasui, K., Nagata, T., et al. 2013, ApJL, 769, L28, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/769/2/L28

    2013 doi

  81. [89]

    2022, A&A, 666, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244411

    Nogueras-Lara, F. 2022, A&A, 666, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244411

    2022 doi

  82. [90]

    2021a, ApJ, 920, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac185e —

    Nogueras-Lara, F., Sch¨odel, R., & Neumayer, N. 2021a, ApJ, 920, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac185e —. 2021b, A&A, 653, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140996

    doi

  83. [91]

    T., Dong, H., et al

    Nogueras-Lara, F., Gallego-Calvente, A. T., Dong, H., et al. 2018, A&A, 610, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732002

    2018 doi

  84. [92]

    T., et al

    Nogueras-Lara, F., Sch¨odel, R., Gallego-Calvente, A. T., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936263 —. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 377, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0967-9

    2019 doi

  85. [93]

    2023, A&A, 680, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347421

    Nogueras-Lara, F., Feldmeier-Krause, A., Sch¨odel, R., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347421

    2023 doi

  86. [94]

    S., Park, C., Cha, S.-M., et al

    Oh, J. S., Park, C., Cha, S.-M., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    2014

  87. [95]

    9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V , ed

    Series, V ol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V , ed. S. K. Ramsay, I. S. McLean, & H. Takami, 914739, doi: 10.1117/12.2055651

    doi

  88. [96]

    T., Yuk, I.-S., et al

    Park, C., Jaffe, D. T., Yuk, I.-S., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    2014

  89. [97]

    9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V , ed

    Series, V ol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V , ed. S. K. Ramsay, I. S. McLean, & H. Takami, 91471D, doi: 10.1117/12.2056431

    doi

  90. [98]

    L., Kyuberis, A

    Polyansky, O. L., Kyuberis, A. A., Zobov, N. F., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 2597, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1877

    2018 doi

  91. [99]

    P., et al

    Renaud, F., Agertz, O., Andersson, E. P., et al. 2021a, MNRAS, 503, 5868, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab543

    doi

  92. [100]

    I., et al

    Renaud, F., Agertz, O., Read, J. I., et al. 2021b, MNRAS, 503, 5846, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab250

    doi

  93. [101]

    M., Ryde, N., Thorsbro, B., et al

    Rich, R. M., Ryde, N., Thorsbro, B., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 239, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa970a

    2017 doi

  94. [102]

    S., Girardi, L., Miglio, A., et al

    Rodrigues, T. S., Girardi, L., Miglio, A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2758, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1907

    2014 doi

  95. [103]

    S., Bossini, D., Miglio, A., et al

    Rodrigues, T. S., Bossini, D., Miglio, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1433, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx120

    2017 doi

  96. [104]

    2017, A&A, 601, A140, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629160

    Rojas-Arriagada, A., Recio-Blanco, A., de Laverny, P., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A140, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629160

    2017 doi

  97. [105]

    2020, MNRAS, 499, 1037, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2807

    Rojas-Arriagada, A., Zasowski, G., Schultheis, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 1037, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2807

    2020 doi

  98. [106]

    K., Rich, R

    Ryde, N., Fritz, T. K., Rich, R. M., et al. 2016a, ApJ, 831, 40, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/40

    doi

  99. [107]

    2015, A&A, 573, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424486

    Ryde, N., & Schultheis, M. 2015, A&A, 573, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424486

    2015 doi

  100. [108]

    2016b, AJ, 151, 1, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/1/1

    Ryde, N., Schultheis, M., Grieco, V ., et al. 2016b, AJ, 151, 1, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/1/1

    doi

  101. [109]

    2010, A&A, 509, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912687

    Ryde, N., Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., et al. 2010, A&A, 509, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912687

    2010 doi

  102. [110]

    2022, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, V ol

    Sawczynec, E., Mace, G., Gully-Santiago, M., & Jaffe, D. 2022, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 54, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 203.06 Sch¨odel, R., Feldmeier, A., Kunneriath, D., et al. 2014a, A&A, 566, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361...

    2022 doi

  103. [111]

    2015, A&A, 584, A45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527027

    Schultheis, M., Cunha, K., Zasowski, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527027

    2015 doi

  104. [112]

    2020, A&A, 642, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038327

    Schultheis, M., Rojas-Arriagada, A., Cunha, K., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038327

    2020 doi

  105. [113]

    M., Kormendy, J., et al

    Shen, J., Rich, R. M., Kormendy, J., et al. 2010, ApJL, 720, L72, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L72

    2010 doi

  106. [114]

    C., Lucas, P

    Smith, L. C., Lucas, P. W., Kurtev, R., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2789

    2018 doi

  107. [115]

    S., Brooke, J

    Sneden, C., Lucatello, S., Ram, R. S., Brooke, J. S. A., & Bernath, P. 2014, ApJS, 214, 26, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/26

    2014 doi

  108. [116]

    C., Sanders, J

    Sormani, M. C., Sanders, J. L., Fritz, T. K., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 1857, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac639

    2022 doi

  109. [117]

    M., & Kuijken, K

    Soto, M., Rich, R. M., & Kuijken, K. 2007, ApJL, 665, L31, doi: 10.1086/521098

    2007 doi

  110. [118]

    Taylor, M. B. 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 347, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV , ed. P. Shopbell, M. Britton, & R. Ebert, 29

    2005

  111. [119]

    2018, ApJ, 866, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadb97

    Thorsbro, B., Ryde, N., Schultheis, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadb97

    2018 doi

  112. [120]

    M., et al

    Thorsbro, B., Ryde, N., Rich, R. M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 894, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8226

    2020 doi

  113. [121]

    2023, ApJL, 958, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad08b1

    Thorsbro, B., Forsberg, R., Kordopatis, G., et al. 2023, ApJL, 958, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad08b1

    2023 doi

  114. [122]

    1993, in ASP Conf

    Tody, D. 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. 52: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, ed. R. J. Hanisch, R. J. V . Brissenden, & J. Barnes, 173

    1993

  115. [123]

    A., & Piskunov, N

    Valenti, J. A., & Piskunov, N. 1996, A&AS, 118, 595 —. 2012, SME: Spectroscopy Made Easy. http://ascl.net/1202.013 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 22, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37

    1996 doi

  116. [124]

    2019, MNRAS, 482, 1525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2672

    Vasiliev, E. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 1525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2672

    2019 doi

  117. [125]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  118. [126]

    J., & Jaffe, D

    Wang, W., Gully-Santiago, M., Deen, C., Mar, D. J., & Jaffe, D. T. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 7739, Modern Technologies in Space- and Ground-based Telescopes and Instrumentation, ed. E. Atad-Ettedgui & D. Lemke, ...

    2010 doi

  119. [127]

    E., & Weaver, T

    Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181, doi: 10.1086/192237

    1995 doi

  120. [128]

    T., Barnes, S., et al

    Yuk, I.-S., Jaffe, D. T., Barnes, S., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    2010

  121. [129]

    7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed

    Series, V ol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 77351M, doi: 10.1117/12.856864

    doi

  122. [130]

    2015, ApJ, 798, 35, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/35

    Zasowski, G., M´enard, B., Bizyaev, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 35, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/35

    2015 doi

  123. [131]

    2019, ApJ, 870, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeff4

    Zasowski, G., Schultheis, M., Hasselquist, S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeff4

    2019 doi

  124. [132]

    A., et al

    Zoccali, M., Vasquez, S., Gonzalez, O. A., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629805

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.