Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 30 references

Joint ASR and Speaker Role Tagging with Serialized Output Training

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that fine-tuning Whisper with serialized output training and role-specific tokens yields role-tagged transcripts in one decoding pass, cutting multi-talker WER by over 10% relative to an SSL baseline.

desk verdict Honest, workmanlike empirical study—SOT with role tokens on Whisper beats an SSL-CTC baseline on two public datasets; oracle-boundary chunking and missing error bars keep it from a full endorsement. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.10349 v1 pith:YLBAUT3M submitted 2025-06-12 eess.AS cs.SD

Anfeng Xu , Tiantian Feng , Shrikanth Narayanan This is my paper
classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords automaticspeechrecognitionspeakerroletaggingserializedoutputtrainingWhispermulti-talkerworderrorratechild-adultconversationself-otherconversationalAI
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single speech model can transcribe a conversation and label each utterance with a speaker role (child vs adult, or self vs other) at the same time, rather than running recognition and speaker attribution in separate stages. The method fine-tunes Whisper with two added role tokens, and , using serialized output training, so the decoder emits words and role markers interleaved in one pass. On the Playlogue and MMCSG conversational datasets, the approach reports roughly 10 to 15 percent lower multi-talker word error rate than a WavLM-large CTC baseline. The point of the paper is that this makes Whisper-style encoder-decoder models a viable foundation for role-aware transcription.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is serialized output training (SOT), which turns the joint target into one serialized string of lexical tokens and speaker tokens ordered by utterance timestamps, letting an attention-based encoder-decoder model learn content and attribution jointly. The concrete adaptation extends Whisper's vocabulary with <spk0> and <spk1>, maps dataset-specific roles to those tokens, and decodes with the standard Whisper initialization tokens. Multi-talker WER (mtWER) is also load-bearing because it counts attribution errors alongside insertions, deletions, and substitutions, so the reported reductions reflect the joint objective rather than ASR alone.

What would settle it

Run the same SOT fine-tuned Whisper models on Playlogue and MMCSG with an automatic voice-activity detection or segmentation module instead of ground-truth silence boundaries and compare end-to-end mtWER; if the 10--15% advantage over the WavLM baseline shrinks or reverses, the central claim as a deployable method fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that serialized output training transfers from speaker diarization to speaker role tagging when applied to Whisper. By adding role-specific special tokens to the tokenizer and fine-tuning the decoder to produce a target sequence in which words and role markers are ordered by utterance timestamps, the model learns joint recognition and role attribution in a single decoding pass. The paper reports more than 10% relative multi-talker WER reduction across both datasets, with the largest model best on child-adult speech (Playlogue) and the small English-only model best on self-other speech (MMCSG), and it attributes the gains to Whisper's pretrained encoder-decoder representations plus the role tokens. The authors conclude that SOT with Whisper is a feasible unified model for speaker-role aware speech transcription.

Load-bearing premise

The gains are measured on audio that is pre-segmented with ground-truth silence boundaries, so a deployed system would first need an automatic segmentation step whose errors are not included in the reported numbers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A Whisper model fine-tuned with SOT produces role-tagged transcripts without a separate diarization or role-classification module, simplifying conversational speech pipelines.
  • The reported 10--15% mtWER reduction is the demonstration that role-aware SOT can beat a CTC-based self-supervised baseline on real-world child-adult and self-other conversations.
  • English-only Whisper variants generally fine-tune better than multilingual ones for this task when new tokens are added, suggesting language-specific pretraining reduces task-transfer mismatch.
  • Freezing the encoder hurts performance, especially for acoustically variable roles such as child speech, so encoder fine-tuning is part of what makes the method work.
  • Longer input windows beyond 15 seconds and preceding-transcript conditioning do not help, so the simple per-segment setup is preferred.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because evaluation uses ground-truth silence boundaries to segment audio, an automatic VAD or segmenter is the missing piece; coupling the SOT model with a real segmenter and measuring end-to-end mtWER would test whether the advantage survives deployment.
  • The same token scheme should extend to more than two roles (e.g., doctor, nurse, patient) by adding more special tokens, though the paper only demonstrates binary roles and larger token sets may need more data.
  • The failure of preceding-transcript conditioning hints at a teacher-forcing mismatch; a scheduled-sampling or a lightweight context module could recover the intended benefit while avoiding error propagation.
  • Mapping roles to arbitrary tokens rather than fixed identity labels may let the same model switch between role taxonomies by changing the pre/postprocessing mapping, a property worth testing across datasets.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes fine-tuning Whisper with serialized output training (SOT) using role-specific special tokens (<spk0>/<spk1>) to jointly perform ASR and speaker role tagging in a single decoding pass. The approach is evaluated on two conversational datasets, Playlogue (child-adult) and MMCSG (self-other), against a WavLM-large CTC baseline re-implemented from a prior SSL-based joint ASR/SRT system. The authors report multi-talker WER (mtWER) reductions of roughly 10-15% for the better Whisper variants and analyze the impact of model size, English-only pretraining, audio chunk duration, encoder freezing, and preceding-transcript conditioning. The central claim is that SOT with Whisper is a feasible unified model for role-aware transcription.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper provides a useful and practical extension of SOT to speaker-role tagging, leveraging Whisper's pre-trained AED architecture. The study uses public datasets and a reasonable baseline, and it explores several modeling decisions that are relevant to practitioners. The reported improvements are substantial for the larger Whisper variants, and the analysis of freezing, context conditioning, and model size is informative. The paper does not provide code or checkpoints, but the experimental protocol is described in sufficient detail to be reproducible. The main concerns are the reliance on ground-truth silence boundaries for audio chunking and the absence of statistical confidence measures, both of which affect the strength of the headline claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.B] The evaluation chunks audio into segments up to 15 seconds using ground-truth silence boundaries. The proposed system contains no segmentation or VAD component; a deployed system would require an automatic boundary detector. Because mtWER jointly penalizes recognition and attribution errors, segmentation errors (cutting an utterance, merging speakers, or placing a boundary inside speech) could degrade the measured advantage. The paper reports no experiment with automatic chunking or any sensitivity analysis to boundary quality. This is load-bearing for the claim that the approach is feasible as a unified model, since the evaluation assumes oracle access to information the model never produces. Please add an experiment with an automatic segmentation method (e.g., a VAD or the baseline's chunking) and/or a perturbation analysis showing how mtWER changes with boundary noise.
  2. [Tables I and II] All reported mtWER, WER, and AER numbers come from a single training run with no error bars, significance tests, or multiple seeds. The headline claim of 'more than 10% reduction' rests on point estimates that could be within run-to-run variance, especially given the small training sets (e.g., MMCSG has only 8.5h of training audio). Please report results over at least 3 seeds and provide bootstrap confidence intervals or a paired significance test for the main Whisper-vs-baseline comparisons.
  3. [Section III.C and Tables I-II] The baseline replaces the original wav2vec 2.0/XLS-R models from the cited prior work [3] with WavLM-large. This is a different model than the one in the cited SOTA system; the comparison is thus against a re-implementation rather than the original published baseline. The choice is justified by SUPERB performance, but it would strengthen the paper to clarify whether hyperparameters for the WavLM baseline were tuned to a comparable degree, and ideally to also report results with the original [3] models if feasible. This affects how fairly the 'previous baseline method' comparison generalizes.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IV.B] Please specify whether the 'around 12.5 seconds average durations' applies to both datasets and to train/validation/test splits equally.
  2. [Section VI.A] Figure 4 is referenced but no figure panel appears in the manuscript text I reviewed; please ensure the figure is included in the final submission.
  3. [Table III] The caption says 'English only pertaining' which appears to be a typo for 'English-only pretraining'; also consider stating explicitly that negative ΔmtWER indicates improvement.
  4. [Section VI.A] The phrase 'we have experimenting by varying' should be corrected to 'we have experimented with varying'.
  5. [Section IV.A.2] The dataset name appears as 'MMCSSG' in one place; it should be 'MMCSG'.
  6. [Section IV.B] The sentence 'We use a single NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB GPU for all the experiments' would benefit from stating the total compute time or number of runs, which is helpful for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the headline mtWER reduction is an external empirical comparison, not a construction from the metric or from self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical benchmark result: fine-tuned Whisper models with serialized output training achieve more than 10% relative multi-talker WER reduction compared with a WavLM-large CTC baseline on two public datasets. The metric mtWER is defined directly from reference and hypothesis alignment errors, and no parameter or equation in the paper is fitted to the reported outcome. The speaker-role tokens <spk0> and <spk1> are introduced as an extension of Whisper's vocabulary, and their effect is measured through held-out test-set WER, mtWER, and AER, not assumed by construction. The baseline is an externally published model, not a variant of the proposed approach. Self-citations appear in the motivation (e.g., the claim that Whisper encoders contain speaker-role information), but these are not load-bearing for the quantitative result: Tables I through III provide direct experimental evidence computed on official test splits. The use of ground-truth silence boundaries for chunking is a deployment validity limitation, not circularity, because the same chunking is applied symmetrically to both systems and the evaluation does not presuppose the outcome. No derivation step reduces to its own input, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical or conceptual entities are introduced; the role tokens are vocabulary extensions, and the audio window and merge gap are hand-chosen processing choices listed as free parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • Utterance merge gap for MMCSG SOT target preparation = 0.3 seconds
    Section IV.A: adjacent words from the same speaker within 0.3s are merged into one utterance; this hand-chosen threshold determines the serialization granularity.
  • Maximum audio chunk duration = 15 seconds (variants tested up to 30s)
    Section IV.B: audio is chunked under a 15s cap using ground-truth silence boundaries; the choice affects context and error propagation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Whisper's pretrained AED weights can learn to emit role tokens under SOT
    Section III.B: the method relies on fine-tuning to map role labels into output tokens; no analysis is provided for when this fails (tiny models fail badly).
  • domain assumption Ground-truth silence boundaries are available for segmentation
    Section IV.B: 'Using ground-truth silence boundaries, we chunk the audio'; this favorable condition is not available in most deployed systems and is not ablated.
  • domain assumption WavLM-large with CTC fairly represents the prior published baseline
    Section III.C: the authors replace the wav2vec 2.0/XLS-R models of [3] with WavLM-large; no comparison to the original checkpoints is given, so baseline equivalence is assumed.
  • domain assumption The mtWER computation is applied identically to both systems
    Section III.A.2 defines mtWER via a formula but does not specify the alignment toolkit; the comparison is only fair if alignment and attribution error counting are symmetric.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Joint ASR and Speaker Role Tagging with Serialized Output Training." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YLBAUT3M

@misc{pith2026250610349,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Joint ASR and Speaker Role Tagging with Serialized Output Training},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YLBAUT3M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.10349}
}
read the original abstract

Automatic Speech Recognition systems have made significant progress with large-scale pre-trained models. However, most current systems focus solely on transcribing the speech without identifying speaker roles, a function that is critical for conversational AI. In this work, we investigate the use of serialized output training (SOT) for joint ASR and speaker role tagging. By augmenting Whisper with role-specific tokens and fine-tuning it with SOT, we enable the model to generate role-aware transcriptions in a single decoding pass. We compare the SOT approach against a self-supervised previous baseline method on two real-world conversational datasets. Our findings show that this approach achieves more than 10% reduction in multi-talker WER, demonstrating its feasibility as a unified model for speaker-role aware speech transcription.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.10349 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the spoken conversation analysis pipeline. The pipeline [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Error components for mtWER. The yellow and blue colors highlight [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the modeling pipelines illustrating (1) a traditional sequential approach, (2) a joint baseline approach, and (3) the proposed SOT-based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: mtWERs when varying audio input duration using Whisper-small.en. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    Joint vs sequential speaker- role detection and automatic speech recognition for air-traffic control,

    A. Blatt, A. Krishnan, and D. Klakow, “Joint vs sequential speaker- role detection and automatic speech recognition for air-traffic control,” Interspeech, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    End-to-end speech recognition: A survey,

    R. Prabhavalkar, T. Hori, T. N. Sainath, R. Schl ¨uter, and S. Watanabe, “End-to-end speech recognition: A survey,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , vol. 32, pp. 325–351, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    A review of speaker diarization: Recent advances with deep learning,

    T. J. Park, N. Kanda, D. Dimitriadis, K. J. Han, S. Watanabe, and S. Narayanan, “A review of speaker diarization: Recent advances with deep learning,” Computer Speech & Language , vol. 72, p. 101317, 2022

    2022

  4. [4]

    Joint speech recognition and speaker diarization via sequence transduction,

    L. E. Shafey, H. Soltau, and I. Shafran, “Joint speech recognition and speaker diarization via sequence transduction,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.05337, 2019

    arXiv 1907

  5. [5]

    One model to rule them all? towards end-to-end joint speaker diarization and speech recognition,

    S. Cornell, J.-w. Jung, S. Watanabe, and S. Squartini, “One model to rule them all? towards end-to-end joint speaker diarization and speech recognition,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 11 856–11 860

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Sortformer: Seamless integration of speaker diarization and asr by bridging timestamps and tokens,

    T. Park, I. Medennikov, K. Dhawan, W. Wang, H. Huang, N. R. Koluguri, K. C. Puvvada, J. Balam, and B. Ginsburg, “Sortformer: Seamless integration of speaker diarization and asr by bridging timestamps and tokens,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06656 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Serialized output training for end-to-end overlapped speech recognition,

    N. Kanda, Y . Gaur, X. Wang, Z. Meng, and T. Yoshioka, “Serialized output training for end-to-end overlapped speech recognition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.12687, 2020

    arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervi- sion,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, T. Xu, G. Brockman, C. McLeavey, and I. Sutskever, “Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervi- sion,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2023, pp. 28 492–28 518

    2023

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Large language models based asr error correction for child conversations,

    A. Xu, T. Feng, S. H. Kim, S. Bishop, C. Lord, and S. Narayanan, “Large language models based asr error correction for child conversations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16212 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Whislu: End-to-end spoken language under- standing with whisper,

    M. Wang, Y . Li, J. Guo, X. Qiao, Z. Li, H. Shang, D. Wei, S. Tao, M. Zhang, and H. Yang, “Whislu: End-to-end spoken language under- standing with whisper,” in Proc. Interspeech, vol. 2023, 2023, pp. 770– 774

    2023

  3. [11]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Directional speech recognition for speaker disambiguation and cross- talk suppression,

    J. Lin, N. Moritz, R. Xie, K. Kalgaonkar, C. Fuegen, and F. Seide, “Directional speech recognition for speaker disambiguation and cross- talk suppression,” in Proc. Interspeech, vol. 2023, 2023, pp. 3522–3526

    2023

  5. [13]

    Agadir: Towards array-geometry agnostic directional speech recognition,

    J. Lin, N. Moritz, Y . Huang, R. Xie, M. Sun, C. Fuegen, and F. Seide, “Agadir: Towards array-geometry agnostic directional speech recognition,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 11 951–11 955

    2024

  6. [14]

    Directional source separation for robust speech recognition on smart glasses,

    T. Feng, J. Lin, Y . Huang, W. He, K. Kalgaonkar, N. Moritz, L. Wan, X. Lei, M. Sun, and F. Seide, “Directional source separation for robust speech recognition on smart glasses,” in ICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICAS...

    2025

  7. [15]

    Streaming multi-talker asr with token-level serialized output training,

    N. Kanda, J. Wu, Y . Wu, X. Xiao, Z. Meng, X. Wang, Y . Gaur, Z. Chen, J. Li, and T. Yoshioka, “Streaming multi-talker asr with token-level serialized output training,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00842 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Bertraffic: Bert-based joint speaker role and speaker change detection for air traffic control com- munications,

    J. Zuluaga-Gomez, S. S. Sarfjoo, A. Prasad, I. Nigmatulina, P. Motlicek, K. Ondrej, O. Ohneiser, and H. Helmke, “Bertraffic: Bert-based joint speaker role and speaker change detection for air traffic control com- munications,” in 2022 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (...

    2022

  9. [17]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,

    J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Pro- ceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technolo...

    2019

  10. [18]

    Who said what wsw 2.0? enhanced automated analysis of preschool classroom speech,

    A. Sun, T. Feng, G. Gutierrez, J. J. Londono, A. Xu, B. Elbaum, S. Narayanan, L. K. Perry, and D. S. Messinger, “Who said what wsw 2.0? enhanced automated analysis of preschool classroom speech,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09972, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations,

    A. Baevski, Y . Zhou, A. Mohamed, and M. Auli, “wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 33, pp. 12 449– 12 460, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Exploring speech foundation models for speaker diariza- tion in child-adult dyadic interactions,

    A. Xu, K. Huang, T. Feng, L. Shen, H. Tager-Flusberg, and S. Narayanan, “Exploring speech foundation models for speaker diariza- tion in child-adult dyadic interactions,” Interspeech, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Data efficient child-adult speaker diarization with simulated conversations,

    A. Xu, T. Feng, H. Tager-Flusberg, C. Lord, and S. Narayanan, “Data efficient child-adult speaker diarization with simulated conversations,” in ICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

    2025

  14. [22]

    V ox-profile: A speech foundation model benchmark for characterizing diverse speaker and speech traits,

    T. Feng, J. Lee, A. Xu, Y . Lee, T. Lertpetchpun, X. Shi, H. Wang, T. Thebaud, L. Moro-Velazquez, D. Byrd et al., “V ox-profile: A speech foundation model benchmark for characterizing diverse speaker and speech traits,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14648 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    The chime-8 mmcsg chal- lenge: Multi-modal conversations in smart glasses,

    K. Zmolikova, S. Merello, K. Kalgaonkar, J. Lin, N. Moritz, P. Ma, M. Sun, H. Chen, A. Saliou, S. Petridis et al., “The chime-8 mmcsg chal- lenge: Multi-modal conversations in smart glasses,” in 8th International Workshop on Speech Processing in Everyday Environments (CHiME) ,...

    2024

  16. [24]

    Xls-r: Self-supervised cross-lingual speech representation learning at scale,

    A. Babu, C. Wang, A. Tjandra, K. Lakhotia, Q. Xu, N. Goyal, K. Singh, P. V on Platen, Y . Saraf, J. Pinoet al. , “Xls-r: Self-supervised cross-lingual speech representation learning at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09296, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Wavlm: Large-scale self-supervised pre- training for full stack speech processing,

    S. Chen, C. Wang, Z. Chen, Y . Wu, S. Liu, Z. Chen, J. Li, N. Kanda, T. Yoshioka, X. Xiao et al. , “Wavlm: Large-scale self-supervised pre- training for full stack speech processing,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1505–1518, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Superb: Speech processing universal performance benchmark,

    S.-w. Yang, P.-H. Chi, Y .-S. Chuang, C.-I. J. Lai, K. Lakhotia, Y . Y . Lin, A. T. Liu, J. Shi, X. Chang, G.-T. Lin et al., “Superb: Speech processing universal performance benchmark,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.01051 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Playlogue: Dataset and benchmarks for analyzing adult- child conversations during play,

    M. Kalanadhabhatta, M. M. Rastikerdar, T. Rahman, A. S. Grabell, and D. Ganesan, “Playlogue: Dataset and benchmarks for analyzing adult- child conversations during play,”Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–34, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    The talkbank project,

    B. MacWhinney, “The talkbank project,” in Creating and digitizing language corpora: V olume 1: Synchronic databases . Springer, 2007, pp. 163–180

    2007

  21. [29]

    Nemo: a toolkit for building ai applications using neural modules,

    O. Kuchaiev, J. Li, H. Nguyen, O. Hrinchuk, R. Leary, B. Ginsburg, S. Kriman, S. Beliaev, V . Lavrukhin, J. Cook et al. , “Nemo: a toolkit for building ai applications using neural modules,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.09577, 2019

    1909 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Huggingface’s trans- formers: State-of-the-art natural language processing,

    T. Wolf, L. Debut, V . Sanh, J. Chaumond, C. Delangue, A. Moi, P. Cistac, T. Rault, R. Louf, M. Funtowicz et al., “Huggingface’s trans- formers: State-of-the-art natural language processing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771, 2019

    1910 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.