Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Sums of cubes and the Ratios Conjectures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.03398 v2 pith:YMWALA4B submitted 2021-08-07 math.NT math-phmath.AGmath.MP

classification math.NTmath-phmath.AGmath.MP
keywords varepsilonconjectureshypothesesalmostbmodboundcubesequiv
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Works of Hooley and Heath-Brown imply a near-optimal bound on the number $N$ of integral solutions to $x_1^3+\dots+x_6^3 = 0$ in expanding regions, conditional on automorphy and GRH for certain Hasse--Weil $L$-functions; for regions of diameter $X\ge 1$, the bound takes the form $N\le C(\varepsilon) X^{3+\varepsilon}$ ($\varepsilon>0$). We attribute the $\varepsilon$ to several subtly interacting proof factors; we then remove the $\varepsilon$ assuming some standard number-theoretic hypotheses, mainly featuring the Ratios and Square-free Sieve Conjectures. In fact, our softest hypotheses imply conjectures of Hooley and Manin on $N$, and show that almost all integers $a\not\equiv \pm 4 \bmod{9}$ are sums of three cubes. Our fullest hypotheses are capable of proving power-saving asymptotics for $N$, and producing almost all primes $p\not\equiv \pm 4 \bmod{9}$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Linear growth and moduli spaces of rational curves

    math.NT 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For del Pezzo surfaces of degree at most 5 and for smooth cubic hypersurfaces and intersections of two quadrics over F_q(t), the paper obtains upper bounds N(q^e) = O((C q)^e) with C independent of e, so the exponent ...

Pith tools