Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Adaptive Split Balancing for Optimal Random Forest

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11228 v2 pith:YPSCVTMT submitted 2024-02-17 stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.MEstat.TH

classification stat.MLcs.LGmath.STstat.MEstat.TH
keywords randomadaptiveforestoptimalitytreetreesachievesasbf
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we propose a new random forest algorithm that constructs the trees using a novel adaptive split-balancing method. Rather than relying on the widely-used random feature selection, we propose a permutation-based balanced splitting criterion. The adaptive split balancing forest (ASBF), achieves minimax optimality under the Lipschitz class. Its localized version, which fits local regressions at the leaf level, attains the minimax rate under the broad H\"older class $\mathcal{H}^{q,\beta}$ of problems for any $q\in\mathbb{N}$ and $\beta\in(0,1]$. We identify that over-reliance on auxiliary randomness in tree construction may compromise the approximation power of trees, leading to suboptimal results. Conversely, the proposed less random, permutation-based approach demonstrates optimality over a wide range of models. Although random forests are known to perform well empirically, their theoretical convergence rates are slow. Simplified versions that construct trees without data dependence offer faster rates but lack adaptability during tree growth. Our proposed method achieves optimality in simple, smooth scenarios while adaptively learning the tree structure from the data. Additionally, we establish uniform upper bounds and demonstrate that ASBF improves dimensionality dependence in average treatment effect estimation problems. Simulation studies and real-world applications demonstrate our methods' superior performance over existing random forests.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Feature Bagging Provides Stability

    stat.ML 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Feature bagging provably lowers leave-one-feature-out instability in linear regression, random forward selection, and a dyadic random forest model.

  2. Revisiting local regression: shape regularity, uniform rates, and the limits of random splits

    math.ST 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Shape regularity of local sets is necessary and sufficient for optimal rates in local averaging estimators for Lipschitz regression functions, with k-NN succeeding by construction and random trees failing without geom...

  3. Feature Bagging Provides Stability

    stat.ML 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Feature bagging provably reduces feature instability relative to non-bagged learners, with larger gains under aggressive feature subsampling and modest ensemble size.

Pith tools