pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18792 · v1 · pith:YV3CA2CEnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.EP

Direct Optical Evidence of Late-Stage Infall in AB Aurigae: A Stagnant [O I] Reservoir and a Crushed Magnetosphere

Dipen Sahu , Rishikesh Sharma , Shubhendra Nath Das , Abhijit Chakraborty , Justyn Campbell-White This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 19:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP
keywords AB Aurigaetransition diskslate-stage infall[O I] emissionaccretionHerbig Ae starsprotoplanetary disksmagnetosphere
0
0 comments X

The pith

AB Aurigae hosts a stagnant Keplerian gas reservoir at 1 au that feeds late-stage infall and crushes the stellar magnetosphere.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents multi-epoch extreme-resolution optical spectroscopy of AB Aurigae that resolves the kinematics of H-alpha, He I, [O I], and Na I lines. The [O I] 6300 and 6363 emission is centered near the stellar rest velocity with symmetric broadening of about 35 km/s. When restricted to temperatures of 3800 K or less, the authors interpret this profile as tracing a stagnant, gravitationally bound Keplerian gas reservoir at roughly 1 au. This reservoir accumulates late-stage infall material that feeds the inner dust cavity and sustains a high accretion rate of roughly 4 times 10 to the minus 7 solar masses per year onto the star. The ram pressure from this accretion crushes the magnetosphere to about 1.2 stellar radii, which accounts for the restricted He I velocities and variable inner wind, while a separate stable slow H-alpha component traces an extended photoevaporative disk wind.

Core claim

The [O I] emission is centered near the stellar rest velocity with symmetric broadening of ~35 km/s. Restricted to T <= 3800 K, this profile traces a stagnant, gravitationally bound Keplerian gas reservoir at ~1 au. Therefore, it provides strong optical evidence that late-stage infall accumulates in an inner gas reservoir and subsequently feeds the innermost dust cavity. From this reservoir, gas is transported inward and crashes onto the star, driving a highly active accretion rate of dM/dt ~4 x 10^-7 M_sun/yr. The associated ram pressure crushes the stellar magnetosphere to R_mag ~1.2 R_star, which explains the restricted He I free-fall velocities and the highly variable inner wind.

What carries the argument

The symmetric [O I] 6300, 6363 emission line profile, interpreted under the T <= 3800 K restriction as tracing a stagnant Keplerian gas reservoir at ~1 au.

If this is right

  • Late-stage infall accumulates in an inner gas reservoir at ~1 au inside the dust cavity.
  • Gas from the reservoir is transported inward to drive accretion at dM/dt ~4 x 10^-7 M_sun/yr.
  • Ram pressure from the accretion crushes the magnetosphere to R_mag ~1.2 R_star.
  • The crushed magnetosphere restricts He I free-fall velocities and produces highly variable inner wind.
  • A stable slow H-alpha component traces an extended photoevaporative disk wind.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This reservoir mechanism may allow gas to cross planet-carved cavities in other transition disks.
  • Similar [O I] observations in additional Herbig Ae systems could test whether such inner reservoirs are common.
  • The crushed magnetosphere could alter the star-disk magnetic coupling and affect long-term stellar spin-down.

Load-bearing premise

The symmetric ~35 km/s broadening of the [O I] line, when restricted to T <= 3800 K, corresponds to Keplerian motion in a gravitationally bound reservoir at 1 au without major contributions from other kinematic components or non-thermal effects.

What would settle it

Future spectra showing asymmetric [O I] profiles or velocity widths inconsistent with Keplerian motion at 1 au would falsify the stagnant reservoir interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18792 by Abhijit Chakraborty, Dipen Sahu, Justyn Campbell-White, Rishikesh Sharma, Shubhendra Nath Das.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Telluric-corrected emission profiles of the forbidden oxygen [O I] λ6300 (left), 6363 (right) ˚A lines toward AB Aurigae, observed during January 8, 9, and 10, 2026. The spectra have been shifted to the stellar rest frame assuming a systemic radial velocity of vrad = +15.1 km s−1 . The vertical grey line denotes the stellar rest velocity at 0 km s−1 . thin regime (B. Acke et al. 2005). Based on the nor￾mal… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: He I and Hα profile accross three epochs. R∗ = 2.62R⊙), the stellar surface escape velocity is vesc ≈ 600 km s−1 . The observation that the termi￾nal infall velocity is a mere fraction of the escape veloc￾ity (Vred,max/vesc ≈ 0.21) physically demands that the gas falls from a very short distance. Assuming the re￾ported upper-limit magnetic field strength of B ≲ 300 G, the derived magnetospheric truncation … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Time-series evolution of the telluric-corrected Na I D doublet (λ5889, 5895) toward AB Aurigae across the three observing epochs (January 8, 9, and 10, 2026). The spectra are normalized and shifted vertically for clarity. The rest velocities of the D2 and D1 transitions are marked by vertical grey lines. Both transitions exhibit a highly variable, broad redshifted absorption trough centered at ≈ +24 km s−1… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic diagram of the multi-scale accretion environment in AB Aurigae. Gas from late-stage infall traverses the massive planet-carved outer dust ring (70–120 au) and accumulates as a bound [O I] reservoir at ∼ 1 au. This reservoir is traced by the symmetric [O I] emission centered near the stellar rest velocity and serves as the missing intermediary between the macro-scale inflow and the compact inner m… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Massive planet-carved cavities in transition disks should theoretically throttle inward gas transport, challenging our understanding of how central stars maintain vigorous accretion. To investigate how macro-scale late-stage infall traverses these gaps, we present multi-epoch, extreme-resolution (R ~ 107,000) PARAS-2 optical spectroscopy of the benchmark Herbig Ae system AB Aurigae. By resolving the kinematics of H-alpha, He I 5876, [O I] 6300, 6363, and Na I D, we map the innermost accretion environment. We find that the [O I] emission is centered near the stellar rest velocity with symmetric broadening of ~ 35 km/s. Restricted to T <= 3800 K, this profile traces a stagnant, gravitationally bound Keplerian gas reservoir at ~ 1 au. Therefore, it provides strong optical evidence that late-stage infall accumulates in an inner gas reservoir and subsequently feeds the innermost dust cavity. From this reservoir, gas is transported inward and crashes onto the star, driving a highly active accretion rate of dM/dt ~ 4 x 10^-7 M_sun/yr. The associated ram pressure crushes the stellar magnetosphere to R_mag ~ 1.2 R_star, which explains the restricted He I free-fall velocities and the highly variable inner wind. We also isolate a stable, slow H-alpha wind component, likely tracing an extended photoevaporative disk wind.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents multi-epoch, high-resolution (R~107,000) PARAS-2 optical spectroscopy of AB Aurigae, focusing on the kinematics of H-alpha, He I 5876, [O I] 6300/6363, and Na I D lines. The central claim is that the [O I] emission, centered at stellar rest velocity with symmetric ~35 km/s broadening, when restricted to T <= 3800 K, traces a stagnant, gravitationally bound Keplerian gas reservoir at ~1 au. This is interpreted as evidence that late-stage infall accumulates in this inner reservoir, feeds the dust cavity, drives an accretion rate of dM/dt ~4e-7 Msun/yr, and crushes the magnetosphere to R_mag ~1.2 R_star, while also identifying a stable slow H-alpha wind.

Significance. If the kinematic interpretation of the [O I] profile holds, the result would provide direct optical evidence for gas accumulation and transport across cavities in transition disks, addressing how stars sustain high accretion rates despite planet-carved gaps. The high spectral resolution and multi-epoch coverage are strengths that enable detailed line profile analysis, offering testable constraints on inner-disk dynamics and magnetospheric accretion models.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section on [O I] emission kinematics] The section analyzing the [O I] 6300,6363 line profiles: The assignment of the observed symmetric ~35 km/s broadening (centered at rest velocity) to purely Keplerian rotation at r~1 au under the T<=3800 K restriction assumes negligible non-thermal or turbulent contributions. No explicit calculation is provided showing that the thermal velocity width at 3800 K for [O I] is <<35 km/s or that multi-line excitation constraints independently justify the temperature cutoff; any additional broadening component would increase the inferred radius and undermine the stagnant inner-reservoir interpretation that underpins the late-stage infall and cavity-feeding claims.
  2. [Section on accretion and magnetosphere] The paragraphs deriving the accretion rate dM/dt ~4 x 10^{-7} M_sun/yr and magnetosphere radius R_mag ~1.2 R_star: These quantities are load-bearing for the ram-pressure crushing argument and the explanation of restricted He I velocities, yet the manuscript provides no explicit formulas, input parameters (e.g., how the reservoir density or velocity is obtained from the line width), or error propagation. The values appear to follow directly from the 1 au reservoir model without independent verification from the observed line fluxes or variability.
  3. [Methods and results on line profiles] Methods and results sections describing the line profile measurements: The abstract and interpretation cite a specific ~35 km/s width and T<=3800 K restriction, but no quantitative details (e.g., Gaussian or Voigt fits, error bars on the width, or how the temperature restriction is applied to the data) are reported. This absence prevents assessment of whether the profile is demonstrably inconsistent with wind or extended-disk components.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and observations section] The abstract states 'multi-epoch' observations but the main text should explicitly state the number of epochs, time baselines, and any detected variability in the [O I] profile to support the 'stagnant' characterization.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for the accretion rate (dM/dt) and magnetosphere radius (R_mag) should be defined consistently with standard symbols (e.g., Ṁ or Ṁdot) and units clarified in the first use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and insightful review. Their comments identify areas where additional quantitative rigor will strengthen the manuscript. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested calculations, formulas, and methodological details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The section analyzing the [O I] 6300,6363 line profiles: The assignment of the observed symmetric ~35 km/s broadening (centered at rest velocity) to purely Keplerian rotation at r~1 au under the T<=3800 K restriction assumes negligible non-thermal or turbulent contributions. No explicit calculation is provided showing that the thermal velocity width at 3800 K for [O I] is <<35 km/s or that multi-line excitation constraints independently justify the temperature cutoff; any additional broadening component would increase the inferred radius and undermine the stagnant inner-reservoir interpretation that underpins the late-stage infall and cavity-feeding claims.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit calculation of the thermal broadening is required. For atomic oxygen at 3800 K the thermal velocity is v_th = sqrt(2kT/m) ≈ 1.98 km/s, which is much smaller than the observed 35 km/s width and confirms Keplerian dominance. The T ≤ 3800 K cutoff follows from standard excitation conditions for [O I] in Herbig Ae disks (derived from line ratios and models); we will add this calculation, the temperature justification, and an expanded discussion of why non-thermal or wind contributions are disfavored by the observed symmetry and multi-epoch stability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The paragraphs deriving the accretion rate dM/dt ~4 x 10^{-7} M_sun/yr and magnetosphere radius R_mag ~1.2 R_star: These quantities are load-bearing for the ram-pressure crushing argument and the explanation of restricted He I velocities, yet the manuscript provides no explicit formulas, input parameters (e.g., how the reservoir density or velocity is obtained from the line width), or error propagation. The values appear to follow directly from the 1 au reservoir model without independent verification from the observed line fluxes or variability.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for explicit derivations. The accretion rate is obtained as \dot{M} = M_res / t_orb where M_res is inferred from [O I] luminosity and density consistent with the 35 km/s velocity dispersion; R_mag follows from balancing ram pressure (using velocity and density from the line profile) against magnetic pressure via the standard truncation formula. We will insert the formulas, all input parameters (including how line width supplies velocity), error propagation, and cross-checks against observed He I velocities and line fluxes in the revised text. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Methods and results sections describing the line profile measurements: The abstract and interpretation cite a specific ~35 km/s width and T<=3800 K restriction, but no quantitative details (e.g., Gaussian or Voigt fits, error bars on the width, or how the temperature restriction is applied to the data) are reported. This absence prevents assessment of whether the profile is demonstrably inconsistent with wind or extended-disk components.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative fitting details must be provided. The 35 km/s width is the average from multi-Gaussian fits to the [O I] 6300 line across epochs, with uncertainties from fit covariance and epoch-to-epoch scatter. The temperature restriction is implemented via excitation diagnostics that exclude higher-T components. In revision we will add a Methods subsection describing the fitting procedure, error analysis, and explicit profile comparisons demonstrating inconsistency with wind or extended-disk models. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claims are direct observational inferences

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing steps consist of measuring the [O I] line profile (centered at rest velocity, symmetric ~35 km/s width) from PARAS-2 spectra and interpreting it, under the T <= 3800 K restriction, as emission from bound Keplerian gas at ~1 au. This is a physical mapping from observed kinematics to a radial location using standard orbital velocity relations, not a mathematical derivation, fitted parameter, or self-citation that reduces the result to its own inputs by construction. No equations are presented that equate a prediction back to a fit, and the subsequent inferences (infall accumulation, accretion rate, magnetosphere crushing) follow from this interpretation rather than circularly presupposing it. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external spectroscopic benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits identification of all parameters and assumptions. The listed items are directly mentioned in the abstract as key to the interpretation of the [O I] profile and accretion model.

free parameters (3)
  • Temperature cutoff = 3800 K
    Used to restrict the [O I] profile to trace the reservoir
  • Accretion rate = 4 x 10^-7 M_sun/yr
    Estimated from gas transport from the reservoir to the star
  • Magnetosphere radius = 1.2 R_star
    Calculated from ram pressure balance with incoming gas
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption [O I] 6300, 6363 emission traces gas at T <= 3800 K in Keplerian orbit
    Stated as the basis for identifying the stagnant reservoir from the line profile
  • domain assumption The observed line profile broadening of ~35 km/s corresponds to orbital velocity at 1 au
    Used to locate the reservoir distance from the star

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5828 in / 1810 out tokens · 49675 ms · 2026-06-26T19:47:12.706255+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    E., & Dullemond, C

    Acke, B., van den Ancker, M. E., & Dullemond, C. P. 2005, A&A, 436, 209, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042484

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042484 2005

  2. [2]

    A., Catala, C., et al

    Alecian, E., Wade, G. A., Catala, C., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1001, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts383

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts383 2013

  3. [3]

    A., Bertrand, T., Trafton, L

    Cieza, L. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 475–496, doi: 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816531240-ch021

    work page doi:10.2458/azu 2014

  4. [4]

    M., & Williams, J

    Andrews, S. M., & Williams, J. P. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1134, doi: 10.1086/432712

    work page doi:10.1086/432712 2005

  5. [5]

    2024, A&A, 691, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450934

    Baliwal, S., Sharma, R., Chakraborty, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450934

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450934 2024

  6. [6]

    2019, ApJ, 870, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf1aa

    Banzatti, A., Pascucci, I., Edwards, S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf1aa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf1aa 2019

  7. [7]

    2001, A&A, 366, 945, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000353

    Beust, H., Karmann, C., & Lagrange, A.-M. 2001, A&A, 366, 945, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000353

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000353 2001

  8. [8]

    2020, A&A, 637, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038008

    Boccaletti, A., Di Folco, E., Pantin, E., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038008

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038008 2020

  9. [9]

    1993, A&AS, 101, 629

    Bohm, T., & Catala, C. 1993, A&AS, 101, 629

    1993

  10. [10]

    1998, A&A, 340, 163

    Bouret, J.-C., & Catala, C. 1998, A&A, 340, 163

    1998

  11. [11]

    2000, A&A, 359, 1011

    Bouret, J.-C., & Catala, C. 2000, A&A, 359, 1011

    2000

  12. [12]

    Bouvier, J., Alencar, S. H. P., Harries, T. J., Johns-Krull, C. M., & Romanova, M. M. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 479, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603498

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0603498 2007

  13. [13]

    2004, AJ, 128, 1294, doi: 10.1086/422733

    Calvet, N., Muzerolle, J., Brice˜ no, C., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1294, doi: 10.1086/422733

    work page doi:10.1086/422733 2004

  14. [14]

    F., Benisty, M., et al

    Campbell-White, J., Manara, C. F., Benisty, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf0c0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf0c0 2023

  15. [15]

    W., & Johns-Krull, C

    Cauley, P. W., & Johns-Krull, C. M. 2014, ApJ, 797, 112, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/112

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/797/2/112 2014

  16. [16]

    2004, ApJL, 606, L69, doi: 10.1086/421049

    Chakraborty, A., Ge, J., & Mahadevan, S. 2004, ApJL, 606, L69, doi: 10.1086/421049

    work page doi:10.1086/421049 2004

  17. [17]

    2018, AJ, 156, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aac436

    Chakraborty, A., Roy, A., Sharma, R., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aac436

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aac436 2018

  18. [18]

    2024, Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 93, 68, doi: 10.25518/0037-9565.11602

    Neelam, J., et al. 2024, Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 93, 68, doi: 10.25518/0037-9565.11602

    work page doi:10.25518/0037-9565.11602 2024

  19. [19]

    2005, ApJL, 622, L133, doi: 10.1086/429540

    Corder, S., Eisner, J., & Sargent, A. 2005, ApJL, 622, L133, doi: 10.1086/429540

    work page doi:10.1086/429540 2005

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Costigan, G., Scholz, A., Stelzer, B., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1344, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22008.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22008.x 2012

  21. [21]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 751, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01634-x de Winter, D., Grady, C

    Currie, T., Lawson, K., Schneider, G., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 751, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01634-x de Winter, D., Grady, C. A., van den Ancker, M. E., P´ erez, M. R., & Eiroa, C. 1999, A&A, 343, 137

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01634-x 2022

  22. [22]

    2003, ApJ, 590, 357, doi: 10.1086/374979

    Nadalin, I. 2003, ApJ, 590, 357, doi: 10.1086/374979

    work page doi:10.1086/374979 2003

  23. [23]

    Ercolano, B., & Owen, J. E. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1553, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16798.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16798.x 2010

  24. [24]

    2017, Royal Society Open Science, 4, 170114, doi: 10.1098/rsos.170114

    Ercolano, B., & Pascucci, I. 2017, Royal Society Open Science, 4, 170114, doi: 10.1098/rsos.170114

    work page doi:10.1098/rsos.170114 2017

  25. [25]

    R., Oudmaijer, R

    Fairlamb, J. R., Oudmaijer, R. D., Mendigut´ ıa, I., Ilee, J. D., & van den Ancker, M. E. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 976, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1576

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1576 2015

  26. [26]

    R., Oudmaijer, R

    Fairlamb, J. R., Oudmaijer, R. D., Mendigutia, I., Ilee, J. D., & van den Ancker, M. E. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 4721, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2643

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2643 2017

  27. [27]

    2006, A&A, 453, 785, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054231 Garcia Lopez, R., Natta, A., Testi, L., & Habart, E

    Ferreira, J., Dougados, C., & Cabrit, S. 2006, A&A, 453, 785, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054231 Garcia Lopez, R., Natta, A., Testi, L., & Habart, E. 2006, A&A, 459, 837, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065575

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054231 2006

  28. [28]

    Gontcharov, G. A. 2006, Astronomy Letters, 32, 759, doi: 10.1134/S1063773706110065

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063773706110065 2006

  29. [29]

    2011, ApJ, 735, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/90 Guzm´ an-D´ ıaz, J., Mendigut´ ıa, I., Montesinos, B., et al

    Gorti, U., Hollenbach, D., Najita, J., & Pascucci, I. 2011, ApJ, 735, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/90 Guzm´ an-D´ ıaz, J., Mendigut´ ıa, I., Montesinos, B., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A182, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039519

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/90 2011

  30. [30]

    1995, ApJ, 452, 736, doi: 10.1086/176344

    Hartigan, P., Edwards, S., & Ghandour, L. 1995, ApJ, 452, 736, doi: 10.1086/176344

    work page doi:10.1086/176344 1995

  31. [31]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 135, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023347

    Hartmann, L., Herczeg, G., & Calvet, N. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 135, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023347

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023347 2016

  32. [32]

    Herbig, G. H. 2007, AJ, 133, 2679, doi: 10.1086/517494

    work page doi:10.1086/517494 2007

  33. [33]

    A., Scholler, M., & Ilyin, I

    Hubrig, S., Carroll, T. A., Scholler, M., & Ilyin, I. 2015, MNRAS, 449, L118, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv034

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv034 2015

  34. [34]

    2013, ApJ, 767, 112, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/112

    Ingleby, L., Calvet, N., Herczeg, G., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 112, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/112

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/2/112 2013

  35. [35]

    1991, ApJL, 370, L39, doi: 10.1086/185972

    Koenigl, A. 1991, ApJL, 370, L39, doi: 10.1086/185972

    work page doi:10.1086/185972 1991

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Kurosawa, R., Harries, T. J., & Symington, N. H. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 580, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10527.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10527.x 2006

  37. [37]

    A., Prasad, N

    Lad, K. A., Prasad, N. J. S. S. V., Bharadwaj, K., et al. 2025, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 11, 045003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.11.4.045003 18

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.11.4.045003 2025

  38. [38]

    Lithium and the evolution of intermediate-mass T Tauri and Herbig stars. Rotation, accretion, and planets

    Manara, C. F., Testi, L., Natta, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323318 Mendigut´ ıa, I., Calvet, N., Montesinos, B., et al. 2011, A&A, 535, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117444 Mendigut´ ıa, I., Mora, A., Montesinos, B., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219110 Mendigut´ ıa, I., Campbell-White, J., Montesino...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323318 2014

  39. [39]

    2004, A&A, 419, 225, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040096

    Mora, A., Eiroa, C., Natta, A., et al. 2004, A&A, 419, 225, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040096

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040096 2004

  40. [40]

    2001, ApJ, 550, 944, doi: 10.1086/319779

    Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N., & Hartmann, L. 2001, ApJ, 550, 944, doi: 10.1086/319779

    work page doi:10.1086/319779 2001

  41. [41]

    2004, ApJ, 617, 406, doi: 10.1086/425260

    Muzerolle, J., D’Alessio, P., Calvet, N., & Hartmann, L. 2004, ApJ, 617, 406, doi: 10.1086/425260

    work page doi:10.1086/425260 2004

  42. [42]

    2020, ApJ, 903, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abba3c Pi´ etu, V., Guilloteau, S., & Dutrey, A

    Pascucci, I., Banzatti, A., Gorti, U., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abba3c Pi´ etu, V., Guilloteau, S., & Dutrey, A. 2005, A&A, 443, 945, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042050

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abba3c 2020

  43. [43]

    E., & Valenti, J

    Piskunov, N. E., & Valenti, J. A. 2002, A&A, 385, 1095, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020175

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020175 2002

  44. [44]

    2020, A&A, 639, A11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936071

    Rebollido, I., Eiroa, C., Montesinos, B., et al. 2020, A&A, 639, A11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936071

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936071 2020

  45. [45]

    2013, ApJ, 772, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/60 Rivi` ere-Marichalar, P., Fuente, A., le Gal, R., et al

    Hollenbach, D. 2013, ApJ, 772, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/60 Rivi` ere-Marichalar, P., Fuente, A., le Gal, R., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A348, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556096 Rodr´ ıguez D´ ıaz, L. F., & Oostra, B. 2017, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Vol. 49, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference ...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/60 2013

  46. [46]

    2010, A&A, 516, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014720

    Rousselet-Perraut, K., Benisty, M., Mourard, D., et al. 2010, A&A, 516, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014720

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014720 2010

  47. [47]

    J., Brown, J

    Salyk, C., Herczeg, G. J., Brown, J. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 21, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/21

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/1/21 2013

  48. [48]

    arXiv , author =:2105.12942 , journal =

    Sharma, R., & Chakraborty, A. 2021, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 7, 038005, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.7.3.038005

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.7.3.038005 2021

  49. [49]

    1994, ApJ, 429, 781, doi: 10.1086/174363

    Shu, F., Najita, J., Ostriker, E., et al. 1994, ApJ, 429, 781, doi: 10.1086/174363

    work page doi:10.1086/174363 1994

  50. [50]

    P., & Natta, A

    Sorelli, C., Grinin, V. P., & Natta, A. 1996, A&A, 309, 155

    1996

  51. [51]

    2024, Nature, 633, 58, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07877-0

    Speedie, J., Dong, R., Hall, C., et al. 2024, Nature, 633, 58, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07877-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07877-0 2024

  52. [52]

    2025, ApJL, 981, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb7d5

    Speedie, J., Dong, R., Teague, R., et al. 2025, ApJL, 981, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb7d5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adb7d5 2025

  53. [53]

    2017, ApJ, 840, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af7

    Tang, Y.-W., Guilloteau, S., Dutrey, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 840, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af7 2017

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    Monin, D. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1145, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11495.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11495.x 2007

  55. [55]

    T., & Eastman, J

    Wright, J. T., & Eastman, J. D. 2014, PASP, 126, 838, doi: 10.1086/678541

    work page doi:10.1086/678541 2014