Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHF

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.07319 v1 pith:YXEY3DTO submitted 2024-02-11 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords lengthrewardevaluationtraininghackingllmsresponsehuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we study the issue of reward hacking on the response length, a challenge emerging in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) on LLMs. A well-formatted, verbose but less helpful response from the LLMs can often deceive LLMs or even human evaluators to achieve high scores. The same issue also holds for some reward models in RL. To address the challenges in both training and evaluation, we establish a more reliable evaluation protocol for comparing different training configurations, which inspects the trade-off between LLM evaluation score and response length obtained by varying training hyperparameters. Based on this evaluation, we conduct large-scale studies, where the results shed insights into the efficacy of hyperparameters and tricks used in RL on mitigating length bias. We further propose to improve the reward model by jointly training two linear heads on shared feature representations to predict the rewards, one trained to correlate with length, and the other trained to decorrelate with length and therefore focus more on the actual content. We then discard the length head in RL to prevent reward hacking on length. Experiments demonstrate that our approach almost eliminates the reward correlation with length, and improves the obtained policy by a significant margin.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Teacher Hacking in Language Model Distillation

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Distilling a student from an imperfect teacher on a fixed offline dataset can make the student match the teacher's errors while drifting from the true target, a phenomenon the authors call teacher hacking.

  2. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ReOPD offline-distills multi-turn agentic LLMs via teacher-prefix replay plus step-decay sampling, matching online OPD accuracy at ≥4× speed with zero tool calls.

  3. Goedel-Prover: A Frontier Model for Open-Source Automated Theorem Proving

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An open-source theorem-proving model reaches state-of-the-art scores on miniF2F (57.6% Pass@32) and PutnamBench by training on 800K formal proofs synthesized through autoformalization and expert iteration.

  4. Normalized Rewards for Preference Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A regularization term that conserves the combined length-normalized probability of chosen and rejected responses reduces likelihood displacement in DPO/SimPO, improves AlpacaEval and benchmark outcomes, and acts prima...

  5. Aligning Language Models with Observational Data: Opportunities and Risks from a Causal Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning LLMs on observational logs can amplify spurious patterns such as weekday effects, and a confounder-subtraction method, DeconfoundLM, restores causal signal in self-built simulations.

Pith tools