Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 99 references

Particle Injection Problem in Magnetic Reconnection and Turbulence

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Particle injection in magnetic reconnection and turbulence is achieved by Fermi reflection, direct acceleration, and pickup—not by the E>B diffusion regions.

desk verdict A useful, opinionated review whose qualitative point about E>B regions is strong, but whose quantitative injection shares are convention-dependent and should not be taken as the final word. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19938 v1 pith:Z3WT4VZM submitted 2025-06-24 physics.plasm-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph

Fan Guo , Omar French , Qile Zhang , Xiaocan Li , Jeongbhin Seo This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph
keywords magneticreconnectionparticleinjectionnonthermalaccelerationFermipickuprelativisticplasmaturbulenceparticle-in-cellsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the pre-acceleration that lifts thermal particles into the nonthermal power-law population in magnetic reconnection and turbulence—the so-called injection problem—does not happen primarily in the regions where the electric field exceeds the magnetic field (E>B regions), contrary to some earlier claims. Particles reside in these regions for too short a time to gain the required energy. Instead, the paper makes the case that three localized mechanisms, direct acceleration by the reconnection electric field, Fermi reflection off the outflow, and pickup in the downstream, are what inject most particles. For weak guide fields, these channels can inject up to about 40% of particles and about 90% of the energy; both fractions fall as the guide field strengthens.

What carries the argument

The machinery that carries the argument is the injection-share classification of Eq. (5). At the first time step a tracer particle attains energy $\gamma > \gamma_{\rm inj}$, the particle is assigned to one of three mechanisms by comparing the parallel and perpendicular energy gains ($W_\parallel$ vs $W_\perp$) and the particle momenta in the simulation frame versus the $E\times B$ drift frame: $E_{\rm rec}$ acceleration if $W_\parallel > W_\perp$ and $|p_\parallel| > |p'_\perp|$; Fermi kick if $W_\perp > W_\parallel$ and $|p_\parallel| > |p'_\perp|$; pickup if $W_\perp > W_\parallel$ and $|p'_\perp| > |p_\parallel|$. These are supplied by the analytic energy-gain estimates of Eqs. (2)–(4): $W_{\rm direct}/m_e c^2 \simeq 0.1\,\omega_{ce}\tau$ for direct acceleration, $W_{\rm Fermi}/m_e c^2 = 2\sigma/(1+\sigma b_g^2)$ for a Fermi reflection, and $W_{\rm pickup}/m_e c^2 = \gamma_{Ax} - \gamma_0$ for pickup. The classification converts 'what injects particles' into countable population shares, and the efficiencies $\eta_N$ and $\eta_E$ of Eq. (6) convert the injection threshold into the thermal–nonthermal energy partition.

What would settle it

In a weakly guided relativistic reconnection simulation, compute injection shares using Eq. (5) and also using a time-resolved decomposition in which each particle's work is split between mechanisms proportionally to the energy gained from each in every time step before $\gamma_{\rm inj}$ is reached; if the time-resolved shares differ materially from the single-label shares (for instance, if most particles receive comparable energy from $E_\parallel$ and $E_\perp$ during injection), then the claim that a dominant primary mechanism exists would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the primary injection of particles in relativistic magnetic reconnection is accomplished by three mechanisms operating outside the E>B diffusion regions—direct acceleration by the reconnection electric field near X-points, a single Fermi reflection off the relaxing field lines in the exhaust (energy gain $W_{\rm Fermi}/m_e c^2 = 2\sigma/(1+\sigma b_g^2)$), and pickup acceleration in the outflow (energy gain $W_{\rm pickup}/m_e c^2 = \gamma_{Ax} - \gamma_0$). Tracing particles in PIC simulations, the paper labels each particle at its first crossing of the injection energy $\gamma_{\rm inj}$ and reports that for weak guide fields Fermi reflection and pickup dominate, direct acceleration is competitive at high magnetization, and parallel electric fields dominate only when the guide field is strong ($b_g \gtrsim 1$). The number and energy injection efficiencies in the weak-guide-field, high-magnetization case are approximately 40% and 90%, respectively, implying an efficient thermal-to-nonthermal conversion. The same multi-mechanism picture is extended to nonrelativistic and transrelativistic reconnection and to magnetically dominated turbulence, where parallel and perpendicular electric fields contribute comparably and the perpendicular contribution grows with system size.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that we know which mechanism injects each particle rests on the assumption that a single mechanism can be unambiguously identified from the particle's parallel versus perpendicular energy gain and momenta at the moment it crosses the injection threshold, even though particles can be accelerated by parallel and perpendicular fields simultaneously.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Large-scale particle acceleration models that couple MHD reconnection with test particles can treat injection as a small set of localized channels (Fermi reflection at exhausts, direct acceleration near X-points, pickup in outflows) and can ignore resolving kinetic E>B diffusion regions.
  • Injection efficiency directly determines the observable thermal–nonthermal partition: up to about 40% of particles and 90% of energy in weak-guide-field relativistic reconnection, decreasing to about 15% and 60%, respectively, as the guide field reaches $b_g = 1$.
  • Judging an injection mechanism by the highest-energy particles overestimates the role of parallel electric fields; the primary mechanism should be the one that explains the majority of injected particles above $\varepsilon_{\rm inj}$.
  • In relativistic turbulence, the injection shares of parallel and perpendicular electric fields are comparable, and the perpendicular contribution increases with system size, so small kinetic simulations understate the role of motional electric fields.
  • In proton–electron plasmas, ions are injected mainly by perpendicular (motional) electric fields while electrons depend more on parallel (non-ideal) fields, which sets the relative abundance of species in the nonthermal population.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review implies a testable dichotomy: if exhaust-crossing Fermi reflections are the dominant injection channel, then particle energy gains in spacecraft observations (e.g., in Earth's magnetotail) should correlate with exhaust crossings rather than with time spent in E>B regions; this correlation has not yet been measured.
  • The exclusive-label classification of Eq. (5) could be probed by a soft classification that splits each particle's work proportionally between mechanisms up to the injection time; large discrepancies between the two share estimates would indicate that the notion of a single dominant mechanism is not robust.
  • The reported efficiencies depend on the fitted value of $\gamma_{\rm inj}$; propagating the fit uncertainty into $\eta_N$ and $\eta_E$ would convert the 40%/90% numbers into ranges that can be compared across simulation codes and guide-field values.
  • A population-level extension would embed the three analytic energy gains (Eqs. 2–4) into a model where injection is sampled from these channels and followed by Fermi acceleration; the predicted power-law index and thermal fraction could then be compared with full PIC spectra as a consistency check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review paper addresses the particle injection problem in magnetic reconnection and turbulence: how thermal particles are pre-accelerated to the lower bound of a nonthermal power-law spectrum. The authors argue that the diffusion regions where |E|>|B| are not the primary injection channel, based on dwell-time statistics, direct energy-gain measurements, and a test-particle experiment that removes electric fields in E>B regions. They instead attribute injection to three mechanisms—direct acceleration by the non-ideal electric field, Fermi reflection, and pickup acceleration—and quantify their relative contributions using a classification rule in Eq. (5). They report injection efficiencies reaching roughly 40% in particle number and 90% in energy for weak-guide-field relativistic reconnection, and they survey companion regimes: nonrelativistic and transrelativistic reconnection, and relativistic turbulence. The review closes with an outlook emphasizing that kinetic diffusion regions may be ignored in macroscopic particle acceleration models and that injection models are needed for global-scale simulations.

Significance. If the synthesis holds, it would settle an active controversy (Sironi and Spitkovsky vs. Guo et al.) about whether E>B regions are essential for injection, and it would provide concrete input for large-scale and macroscopic particle acceleration models that cannot resolve kinetic scales. The paper's strengths include: a clear presentation of the competing claims; a falsifiable test-particle experiment (Fig. 2c) supporting the claim that E>B electric fields are not necessary for injection; closed-form energy-gain estimates for three mechanisms (Eqs. 2-4); and a cross-regime review that connects relativistic reconnection, nonrelativistic reconnection, and turbulence. The main weakness is that the quantitative injection shares, which are central to the 'primary mechanism' conclusion, rest on a winner-take-all classification rule that the paper itself shows to be convention-dependent. The E>B claim is more robust than the share decomposition, and the paper's practical conclusion about ignoring kinetic diffusion regions is defensible.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (5) and Figs. 4-5, 11] The classification of injection mechanisms is winner-take-all and convention-dependent. Eq. (5) assigns each particle to exactly one mechanism at the first crossing of gamma_inj using inequalities between W_parallel and W_perp and between |p_parallel| and |p'_perp|. The paper itself shows the resulting shares are not unique: Fig. 5 compares this decomposition with W_n vs W_m and W_E>B vs W_E<B and obtains different quantitative shares, and Fig. 11(c,d) shows parallel and perpendicular work acting simultaneously during injection, with the caption stating that 'for many particles classification of the injection mechanism is not straight forward.' Because the reported ordering of mechanisms in Fig. 4 and the associated efficiency statements depend on this arbitrary labeling, the central quantitative synthesis is conditional on the chosen rule. The review should either explicitly frame the shares as one specific decomposition, provide a sensitivity analysis (e.g., fractional attribution or variation of the threshold), or soften the 'primary mechanism' claims accordingly.
  2. [§2.1, Eq. (1)] The dwell-time argument for why E>B regions cannot inject most particles uses the inequality Delta_gamma_E>B <= integral of q r B0 c dt/(m_e c^2) with r ~ 0.1. As written, this bounds only acceleration by a reconnection electric field of magnitude r B0, but in E>B regions the electric field can locally exceed this value by definition (E/B > 1), so Eq. (1) is not a rigorous upper bound on all energy gain inside E>B regions. The conclusion is nevertheless supported by the direct energy-gain distribution in Fig. 2b and by the test-particle experiment in Fig. 2c. The text should present Eq. (1) as an estimate for one specific acceleration channel and rely on the measured energy gains for the global claim.
  3. [§2.3 and §5] The quantitative efficiency numbers—up to 40% number efficiency and 90% energy efficiency in weak-guide-field relativistic reconnection—depend on the fitted injection energy epsilon_inj. The paper notes in Section 5 that 'conclusions can be very different if lower energy particles are included as the nonthermals,' but this caveat is not reflected in the efficiency definitions or in how the numbers are presented in Fig. 6. Given that these numbers are likely to be extracted and used in applications, the review should quantify the sensitivity of eta_N and eta_E to the spectral fitting procedure and to the choice of epsilon_inj, or at least explicitly state the expected uncertainty in the reported efficiencies.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1, Fig. 2c] The test-particle experiment in Fig. 2c is one of the strongest pieces of evidence in the review; the text mentions 84% (94%) for gamma_inj = sigma (sigma/4) but does not state the error bar or the number of particles used. Reporting the statistical uncertainty would strengthen the claim.
  2. [§2.2, Eq. (3)] The Fermi energy-gain formula is correct, but the notation b_g is introduced earlier without an explicit definition at first use in the text; it is defined in the Introduction, but a brief reminder in Section 2.2 would help readability.
  3. [§4, Fig. 18] The caption says the figure shows the 'share of the work done by the parallel electric field' before and after injection, but the axes labels are not clearly described in the text. Please specify the normalization and the exact definition of 'share' used in that figure.
  4. [§5] The sentence 'The role of non-ideal electric field when a guide field is present and when it is proton-electron plasmas' is grammatically incomplete and should be finished.
  5. [References] Some key references are cited as 'in preparation' or arXiv-only (e.g., French et al. [81], Singh et al. [80]). For a review, provide published versions or note their status explicitly so readers can assess reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review is a data-driven synthesis that explicitly discloses the convention-dependence of its injection classification.

full rationale

This paper is a review, not a derivation, and its central quantitative claims are either direct measurements from PIC simulations or kinematic estimates with clearly stated assumptions. The injection-share decomposition in Eq. (5) is explicitly presented as a categorization scheme: particles are 'categorized to a mechanism based on the following criteria,' so the reported shares are transparently defined by that rule rather than derived from a hidden input. The paper further acknowledges in Fig. 5 and Section 5 that different decomposition choices (W_n vs. W_m, W_E>B vs. W_E<B, and even the inclusion of lower-energy particles) can change the conclusions, so the classification is disclosed as convention-dependent rather than smuggled in as a prediction. The E>B insufficiency argument in Sec. 2.1 uses an independent physical estimate (Eq. 1) compared against simulation-measured residence times, and it is robust to two different choices of gamma_inj. The injection energy gamma_inj is fitted from spectra, but it is used as a measured threshold to quantify efficiencies, not renamed as a prediction. Self-citations refer to published simulations by the same group, but the review also engages external works (Sironi, Totorica, Gupta) and does not rely on any uniqueness theorem or ansatz imported solely from the authors' prior work. No step in the paper's argument reduces by construction to its own inputs, so no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. Its quantitative content is carried by the spectral-fitting threshold epsilon_inj and the classification rule (Eq. 5), plus the assumed reconnection rate R used for an order-of-magnitude estimate.

free parameters (2)
  • injection energy threshold epsilon_inj = varies with regime (e.g., sigma/4, sigma, 10, sigma/2, 0.2-0.5 m_p v_A^2)
    Measured by spectral fitting of the lower bound of power laws; all injection shares and efficiency numbers depend on this threshold.
  • reconnection rate R = 0.1
    Assumed in Eq. (1) to estimate acceleration in E>B regions; a standard value but not measured in the specific run shown.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption PIC simulations provide a first-principles description of plasma dynamics and particle acceleration.
    The review's quantitative claims about injection shares and efficiencies rest entirely on kinetic PIC simulations cited from the authors' prior work.
  • ad hoc to paper The classification criteria in Eq. (5) map each particle to a single injection mechanism.
    The share numbers in Figures 4 and 5 depend on this labeling; the paper acknowledges mechanisms can act simultaneously (Fig. 11), making the premise fragile.
  • standard math The Fermi reflection energy gain formula in Eq. (3) applies to the reconnection exhaust geometry.
    Adopted from earlier derivations and used to interpret the Fermi kick contribution; it is an elastic-collision estimate applied to a curved, dynamic exhaust.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Particle Injection Problem in Magnetic Reconnection and Turbulence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z3WT4VZM

@misc{pith2026250619938,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Particle Injection Problem in Magnetic Reconnection and Turbulence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z3WT4VZM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19938}
}
read the original abstract

Magnetic reconnection and turbulence in magnetically-dominated environments have been proposed as important nonthermal particle acceleration mechanisms that generate high energy particles and associated emissions. While the acceleration to high energy that produces the power-law energy distribution has drawn strong interest, recent studies actively discuss pre-acceleration, or injection, to a sufficient energy for a sustained and prolonged Fermi-like acceleration. The injection process is important for determining the fraction of nonthermal particles and energy partition between thermal and nonthermal particles. We review recent advances in understanding the injection mechanisms responsible for populating these nonthermal power-law spectra, and conclude with an outlook for studies and applications of injection models.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Physics Report154(1), 1–75 (1987) https://doi.org/10

    Blandford, R., Eichler, D.: Particle acceleration at astrophysical shocks: A theory of cosmic ray origin. Physics Report154(1), 1–75 (1987) https://doi.org/10. 1016/0370-1573(87)90134-7

    1987

  2. [2]

    Science358(6365), 911–914 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aan4880 arXiv:1711.06223 [astro-ph.HE]

    Abeysekara, A.U., Albert, A., Alfaro, R., Alvarez, C., ´Alvarez, J.D., Arceo, R., Arteaga-Vel´ azquez, J.C., Avila Rojas, D., Ayala Solares, H.A., Barber, A.S., Bautista-Elivar, N., Becerril, A., Belmont-Moreno, E., BenZvi, S.Y., Berley, D., Bernal, A., Braun, J., Brisbois, C., Caballero-Mora, K.S., Capistr´ an, T., Carrami˜ nana, A., Casanova, S., Castil...

    arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Nature Astronomy4, 1140–1147 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1147-7 arXiv:2005.12757 [astro-ph.SR]

    Chen, B., Shen, C., Gary, D.E., Reeves, K.K., Fleishman, G.D., Yu, S., Guo, F., Krucker, S., Lin, J., Nita, G.M., Kong, X.: Measurement of magnetic field and relativistic electrons along a solar flare current sheet. Nature Astronomy4, 1140–1147 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1147-7 arXiv:2005.12757 [astro-ph.SR]

    arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Space Science Reviews90, 413–491 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005105831781 21

    Reames, D.V.: Particle acceleration at the Sun and in the heliosphere. Space Science Reviews90, 413–491 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005105831781 21

    doi:10.1023/a:1005105831781 1999

  5. [5]

    Physics of Plasmas28(5), 052905 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0047644 arXiv:2104.10732 [physics.plasm-ph]

    Li, X., Guo, F., Liu, Y.-H.: The acceleration of charged particles and for- mation of power-law energy spectra in nonrelativistic magnetic reconnection. Physics of Plasmas28(5), 052905 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0047644 arXiv:2104.10732 [physics.plasm-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Space Science Reviews219(8), 75 (2023) https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11214-023-01011-8 arXiv:2307.01376 [physics.space-ph]

    Oka, M., Birn, J., Egedal, J., Guo, F., Ergun, R.E., Turner, D.L., Khotyaintsev, Y., Hwang, K.-J., Cohen, I.J., Drake, J.F.: Particle Acceleration by Magnetic Reconnection in Geospace. Space Science Reviews219(8), 75 (2023) https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11214-023-01011-8 arXiv:2307.01376 [physics.space-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Space Sci- ence Reviews220(4), 43 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-024-01073-2 arXiv:2309.13382 [astro-ph.HE]

    Guo, F., Liu, Y.-H., Zenitani, S., Hoshino, M.: Magnetic Reconnection and Associated Particle Acceleration in High-Energy Astrophysics. Space Sci- ence Reviews220(4), 43 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-024-01073-2 arXiv:2309.13382 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Maximum Energy of Particles in Plasmas

    Oka, M., Makishima, K., Terasawa, T.: Maximum Energy of Particles in Plasmas. Astrophysical Journal979(2), 161 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ad9916 arXiv:2412.00564 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

Show all 99 references
  1. [9]

    Space Science Reviews221(2), 27 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11214-025-01153-x

    Drake, J.F., Antiochos, S.K., Bale, S.D., Chen, B., Cohen, C.M.S., Dahlin, J.T., Glesener, L., Guo, F., Hoshino, M., Imada, S., Oka, M., Phan, T.D., Reeves, K.K., Swisdak, M.: Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares and the Near-Sun Solar Wind. Space Science Reviews221(2), 27 (2...

    2025

  2. [10]

    Fermi, E.: On the origin of the cosmic radiation. Phys. Rev.75, 1169–1174 (1949) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.75.1169

    1949 doi

  3. [11]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society182, 147–156 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/182.2.147

    Bell, A.R.: The acceleration of cosmic rays in shock fronts - I. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society182, 147–156 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/182.2.147

    1978

  4. [12]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics347, 370–374 (1999) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9905178 arXiv:astro- ph/9905178 [astro-ph]

    Drury, L.O., Duffy, P., Eichler, D., Mastichiadis, A.: On “box” models of shock acceleration and electron synchrotron spectra. Astronomy and Astrophysics347, 370–374 (1999) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9905178 arXiv:astro- ph/9905178 [astro-ph]

    1999 doi arXiv

  5. [14]

    Physical Review Letters121(25), 255101 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.255101 arXiv:1809.01168 [astro-ph.HE]

    Comisso, L., Sironi, L.: Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Plasma Turbu- lence. Physical Review Letters121(25), 255101 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.255101 arXiv:1809.01168 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Physical Review D99(8) (2019) 22 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.99.083006

    Lemoine, M.: Generalized fermi acceleration. Physical Review D99(8) (2019) 22 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.99.083006

    2019 doi

  7. [16]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society499(4), 4972–4983 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3131

    Lemoine, M., Malkov, M.A.: Power-law spectra from stochastic acceleration. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society499(4), 4972–4983 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3131

    2020 doi

  8. [17]

    Astro- physical Journal948(1), 19 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acb7dd arXiv:2210.08358 [astro-ph.HE]

    French, O., Guo, F., Zhang, Q., Uzdensky, D.A.: Particle Injection and Non- thermal Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection. Astro- physical Journal948(1), 19 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acb7dd arXiv:2210.08358 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Astrophysi- cal Journal773(2), 158 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/158 arXiv:1303.5174 [astro-ph.HE]

    Guo, F., Giacalone, J.: The Acceleration of Thermal Protons at Paral- lel Collisionless Shocks: Three-dimensional Hybrid Simulations. Astrophysi- cal Journal773(2), 158 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/158 arXiv:1303.5174 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Astrophysical Journal974(1), 47 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ad6561 arXiv:2404.08807 [astro-ph.SR]

    Zhang, Q., Guo, F., Daughton, W., Li, X., Li, H.: Plasma Dynamics and Non- thermal Particle Acceleration in 3D Nonrelativistic Magnetic Reconnection. Astrophysical Journal974(1), 47 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ad6561 arXiv:2404.08807 [astro-ph.SR]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Astro- physical Journal886(2), 122 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c33 arXiv:1909.01420 [astro-ph.HE]

    Comisso, L., Sironi, L.: The Interplay of Magnetically Dominated Turbu- lence and Magnetic Reconnection in Producing Nonthermal Particles. Astro- physical Journal886(2), 122 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c33 arXiv:1909.01420 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Astrophysical Journal Letters798(2), 28 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/L28 arXiv:1409.8291 [astro- ph.HE]

    Caprioli, D., Pop, A.-R., Spitkovsky, A.: Simulations and Theory of Ion Injection at Non-relativistic Collisionless Shocks. Astrophysical Journal Letters798(2), 28 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/L28 arXiv:1409.8291 [astro- ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [23]

    The Astrophysical Journal946(2), 77 (2023) https://doi.org/10

    Hoshino, M.: Energy partition of thermal and nonthermal particles in magnetic reconnection. The Astrophysical Journal946(2), 77 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4357/acbfb5

    2023

  14. [24]

    The Astrophysical Journal818(L9), 7 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8205/818/1/L9 23

    Guo, F., Li, X., Li, H., Daughton, W., Zhang, B., Lloyd-Ronning, N., Liu, Y.-H., Zhang, H., Deng, W.: Efficient production of high-energy nonthermal par- ticles during magnetic reconnection in a magnetically dominated ion–electron plasma. The Astrophysical Journal818(L9), 7 (2...

    2016

  15. [26]

    Astrophysical Journal Letters936(2), 27 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Comisso, L., Sironi, L.: Ion and Electron Acceleration in Fully Kinetic Plasma Turbulence. Astrophysical Journal Letters936(2), 27 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 3847/2041-8213/ac8422 arXiv:2209.04475 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [27]

    Physical Review Letters132(11), 115201 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.115201 arXiv:2210.04113 [astro-ph.SR]

    Zhang, Q., Guo, F., Daughton, W., Li, H., Le, A., Phan, T., Desai, M.: Mul- tispecies Ion Acceleration in 3D Magnetic Reconnection with Hybrid-Kinetic Simulations. Physical Review Letters132(11), 115201 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.115201 arXiv:2210.04113 [a...

    2024 arXiv

  17. [28]

    Astrophysical Journal352, 376 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1086/168544

    Ellison, D.C., Moebius, E., Paschmann, G.: Particle Injection and Accelera- tion at Earth’s Bow Shock: Comparison of Upstream and Downstream Events. Astrophysical Journal352, 376 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1086/168544

    1990 doi

  18. [29]

    Geophysical Research Letters19(5), 433–436 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00379

    Giacalone, J., Burgess, D., Schwartz, S.J., Ellison, D.C.: Hybrid simulations of protons strongly accelerated by a parallel collisionless shock. Geophysical Research Letters19(5), 433–436 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00379

    1992 doi

  19. [30]

    Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics27(7), 1589–1595 (2001) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0954-3899/27/7/316 arXiv:astro-ph/0101175 [astro-ph]

    Kirk, J.G., Dendy, R.O.: Shock acceleration of cosmic rays - a critical review. Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics27(7), 1589–1595 (2001) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0954-3899/27/7/316 arXiv:astro-ph/0101175 [astro-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  20. [31]

    Parsons, J., Spitkovsky, A., Vanthieghem, A.: Microphysics of Particle Reflection in Weibel-Mediated Shocks (2023)

    2023

  21. [32]

    The Astrophysical Journal562(1), 63–66 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/337972

    Zenitani, S., Hoshino, M.: The generation of nonthermal particles in the relativis- tic magnetic reconnection of pair plasmas. The Astrophysical Journal562(1), 63–66 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/337972

    2001 doi

  22. [33]

    Physical Review Letters95(9), 095001 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.095001 arXiv:astro-ph/0505493 [astro-ph]

    Zenitani, S., Hoshino, M.: Three-Dimensional Evolution of a Relativistic Current Sheet: Triggering of Magnetic Reconnection by the Guide Field. Physical Review Letters95(9), 095001 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.095001 arXiv:astro-ph/0505493 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  23. [34]

    Astrophysi- cal Journal770(2), 147 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/147 arXiv:1302.6247 [astro-ph.HE]

    Cerutti, B., Werner, G.R., Uzdensky, D.A., Begelman, M.C.: Simulations of Particle Acceleration beyond the Classical Synchrotron Burnoff Limit in Magnetic Reconnection: An Explanation of the Crab Flares. Astrophysi- cal Journal770(2), 147 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-63...

    2013 arXiv

  24. [35]

    The Astrophysical Journal783(1), 21 (2014) https://doi.org/ 24 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/l21

    Sironi, L., Spitkovsky, A.: Relativistic reconnection: An efficient source of non- thermal particles. The Astrophysical Journal783(1), 21 (2014) https://doi.org/ 24 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/l21

    2014 doi

  25. [36]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics570, 111 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424083

    Melzani, M., Walder, R., Folini, D., Winisdoerffer, C., Favre, J.M.: Relativis- tic magnetic reconnection in collisionless ion-electron plasmas explored with particle-in-cell simulations. Astronomy & Astrophysics570, 111 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424083

    2014 doi

  26. [37]

    ApJ806, 167 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/167

    Guo, F., Liu, Y.-H., Daughton, W., Li, H. ApJ806, 167 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/167

    2015 doi

  27. [38]

    ApJ879(L23), 5 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a15

    Guo, F., Li, X., Daughton, W., Kilian, P., Li, H., Liu, Y.-H., Yan, W., Ma, D. ApJ879(L23), 5 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a15

    2019 doi

  28. [39]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters816(1), 8 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L8

    Werner, G.R., Uzdensky, D.A., Cerutti, B., Nalewajko, K., Begelman, M.C.: The extent of power-law energy spectra in collisionless relativistic magnetic recon- nection in pair plasmas. The Astrophysical Journal Letters816(1), 8 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L8

    2016 doi

  29. [40]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters 843(2), 27 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa7892

    Werner, G.R., Uzdensky, D.A.: Nonthermal particle acceleration in 3d relativis- tic magnetic reconnection in pair plasma. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 843(2), 27 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa7892

    2017 doi

  30. [41]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society473(4), 4840–4861 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2530

    Werner, G.R., Uzdensky, D.A., Begelman, M.C., Cerutti, B., Nalewajko, K.: Non-thermal particle acceleration in collisionless relativistic electron–proton reconnection. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society473(4), 4840–4861 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2530

    2018 doi

  31. [42]

    The Astrophysical Journal870(1), 49 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/aaf1b9

    Schoeffler, K.M., Grismayer, T., Uzdensky, D., Fonseca, R.A., Silva, L.O.: Bright gamma-ray flares powered by magnetic reconnection in QED-strength magnetic fields. The Astrophysical Journal870(1), 49 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/aaf1b9

    2019

  32. [43]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 498(1), 799–820 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2346

    Mehlhaff, J.M., Werner, G.R., Uzdensky, D.A., Begelman, M.C.: Kinetic beam- ing in radiative relativistic magnetic reconnection: a mechanism for rapid gamma-ray flares in jets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 498(1), 799–820 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnr...

    2020 doi

  33. [44]

    The Astrophysical Journal912(1), 48 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abedac

    Hakobyan, H., Petropoulou, M., Spitkovsky, A., Sironi, L.: Secondary energiza- tion in compressing plasmoids during magnetic reconnection. The Astrophysical Journal912(1), 48 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abedac

    2021 doi

  34. [45]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters954(2), 37 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acf135

    Li, X., Guo, F., Liu, Y.-H., Li, H.: A model for nonthermal particle acceleration in relativistic magnetic reconnection. The Astrophysical Journal Letters954(2), 37 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acf135

    2023 doi

  35. [46]

    Zhang, H., Sironi, L., Giannios, D., Petropoulou, M.: The origin of power-law spectra in relativistic magnetic reconnection (2023) 25

    2023

  36. [47]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics262, 26–36 (1992)

    Romanova, M.M., Lovelace, R.V.E.: Magnetic field, reconnection and parti- cle acceleration in extragalactic jets. Astronomy and Astrophysics262, 26–36 (1992)

    1992

  37. [48]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters395(1), 29–33 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00635.x

    Giannios, D., Uzdensky, D.A., Begelman, M.C.: Fast tev variability in blazars: jets in a jet. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters395(1), 29–33 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00635.x

    2009

  38. [49]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society402(3), 1649–1656 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009

    Giannios, D., Uzdensky, D.A., Begelman, M.C.: Fast TeV variability from misaligned minijets in the jet of m87. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society402(3), 1649–1656 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009. 16045.x

    2010

  39. [50]

    Sironi, L., Petropoulou, M., Giannios, D.: Relativistic jets shine through shocks or magnetic reconnection? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450(1), 183–191 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv641

    2015 doi

  40. [51]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics57(1), 467–509 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948

    Blandford, R., Meier, D., Readhead, A.: Relativistic jets from active galactic nuclei. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics57(1), 467–509 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948

    2019 doi

  41. [52]

    Zhang, H., Li, X., Giannios, D., Guo, F., Liu, Y.-H., Dong, L.: Radiation and Polarization Signatures from Magnetic Reconnection in Relativistic Jets. I. A Systematic Study. Astrophysical Journal901(2), 149 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4357/abb1b0 arXiv:2008.09444 [ast...

    2020 arXiv

  42. [53]

    Space Sci Rev173, 521–533 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-012-9931-z

    Hoshino, M., Lyubarsky, Y.: Relativistic reconnection and particle acceleration. Space Sci Rev173, 521–533 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-012-9931-z

    2012 doi

  43. [54]

    Space Science Reviews 191(1-4), 545–573 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0132-9

    Kagan, D., Sironi, L., Cerutti, B., Giannios, D.: Relativistic magnetic reconnec- tion in pair plasmas and its astrophysical applications. Space Science Reviews 191(1-4), 545–573 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0132-9

    2015 doi

  44. [55]

    Physics of Plas- mas27(8), 080501 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0012094 arXiv:2006.15288 [astro-ph.HE]

    Guo, F., Liu, Y.-H., Li, X., Li, H., Daughton, W., Kilian, P.: Recent progress on particle acceleration and reconnection physics during magnetic reconnection in the magnetically-dominated relativistic regime. Physics of Plas- mas27(8), 080501 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0...

    2020 arXiv

  45. [57]

    Astrophysical Journal884(1), 57 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3f2e arXiv:1908.05866 [astro-ph.HE] 26

    Ball, D., Sironi, L., ¨Ozel, F.: The Mechanism of Electron Injection and Accelera- tion in Transrelativistic Reconnection. Astrophysical Journal884(1), 57 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3f2e arXiv:1908.05866 [astro-ph.HE] 26

    2019 arXiv

  46. [58]

    ApJ899(151), 15 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.3847/1538-4357/aba1e9

    Kilian, P., Li, X., Guo, F., Zhang, Q. ApJ899(151), 15 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.3847/1538-4357/aba1e9

    2020 doi

  47. [59]

    Journal of Plasma Physics87(6) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0022377821001185

    Werner, G.R., Uzdensky, D.A.: Reconnection and particle acceleration in three- dimensional current sheet evolution in moderately magnetized astrophysical pair plasma. Journal of Plasma Physics87(6) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0022377821001185

    2021

  48. [60]

    Nature443, 553 (2006) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature05116

    Drake, J.F., Swisdak, M., Che, H., Shay, M.A. Nature443, 553 (2006) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature05116

    2006 doi

  49. [61]

    Astrophysical Journal714(1), 915–926 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/915 arXiv:1004.1154 [astro- ph.SR]

    Oka, M., Phan, T.-D., Krucker, S., Fujimoto, M., Shinohara, I.: Electron Accel- eration by Multi-Island Coalescence. Astrophysical Journal714(1), 915–926 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/915 arXiv:1004.1154 [astro- ph.SR]

    2010 arXiv

  50. [62]

    Physics of Plasmas21, 092304 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4894484

    Dahlin, J.T., Drake, J.F., Swisdak, M.: The mechanisms of electron heating and acceleration during magnetic reconnection. Physics of Plasmas21, 092304 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4894484

    2014 doi

  51. [63]

    Physics of Plasmas 23(12), 120704 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972082

    Dahlin, J.T., Drake, J.F., Swisdak, M.: Parallel electric fields are inefficient drivers of energetic electrons in magnetic reconnection. Physics of Plasmas 23(12), 120704 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972082

    2016 doi

  52. [64]

    Physics of Plasmas24, 092110 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4986211

    Dahlin, J.T., Drake, J.F., Swisdak, M. Physics of Plasmas24, 092110 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4986211

    2017 doi

  53. [65]

    The Astrophysical Journal 811(2), 24 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/811/2/l24

    Li, X., Guo, F., Li, H., Li, G.: Nonthermally dominated electron acceleration during magnetic reconnection in a low-beta plasma. The Astrophysical Journal 811(2), 24 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/811/2/l24

    2015 doi

  54. [66]

    Astrophysical Journal843(1), 21 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa745e

    Li, X., Guo, F., Li, H., Li, G.: Particle Acceleration during Magnetic Recon- nection in a Low-beta Plasma. Astrophysical Journal843(1), 21 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa745e

    2017 doi

  55. [69]

    Physical Review Letters 27 114(6) (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.114.061101

    Hoshino, M.: Angular momentum transport and particle acceleration during magnetorotational instability in a kinetic accretion disk. Physical Review Letters 27 114(6) (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.114.061101

    2015 doi

  56. [70]

    The Astrophysical Journal900(2), 100 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ababab

    Ripperda, B., Bacchini, F., Philippov, A.A.: Magnetic reconnection and hot spot formation in black hole accretion disks. The Astrophysical Journal900(2), 100 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ababab

    2020 doi

  57. [71]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513(3), 4267–4277 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1118

    Nathanail, A., Mpisketzis, V., Porth, O., Fromm, C.M., Rezzolla, L.: Mag- netic reconnection and plasmoid formation in three-dimensional accretion flows around black holes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513(3), 4267–4277 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1118

    2022 doi

  58. [72]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society520(1), 1271–1284 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad176

    Lin, X., Li, Y.-P., Yuan, F.: A ‘coronal-mass-ejection’ model for flares in sagit- tarius a*. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society520(1), 1271–1284 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad176

    2023 doi

  59. [73]

    Physical Review Letters85(22), 4656–4659 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett

    Chandran, B.D.G.: Scattering of energetic particles by anisotropic magneto- hydrodynamic turbulence with a goldreich-sridhar power spectrum. Physical Review Letters85(22), 4656–4659 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett. 85.4656

    2000 doi

  60. [74]

    Physical Review Letters118(5) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.118

    Zhdankin, V., Werner, G.R., Uzdensky, D.A., Begelman, M.C.: Kinetic tur- bulence in relativistic plasma: From thermal bath to nonthermal continuum. Physical Review Letters118(5) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.118. 055103

    2017 doi

  61. [75]

    Astrophysical Journal Letters867(1), 18 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/aae88c arXiv:1805.08754 [astro-ph.HE]

    Zhdankin, V., Uzdensky, D.A., Werner, G.R., Begelman, M.C.: System-size Convergence of Nonthermal Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Plasma Turbu- lence. Astrophysical Journal Letters867(1), 18 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/aae88c arXiv:1805.08754 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [76]

    Physical Review Letters122(5) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.122.055101

    Zhdankin, V., Uzdensky, D.A., Werner, G.R., Begelman, M.C.: Electron and ion energization in relativistic plasma turbulence. Physical Review Letters122(5) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.122.055101

    2019 doi

  63. [77]

    The Astrophysical Journal893(1), 7 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab8122

    Wong, K., Zhdankin, V., Uzdensky, D.A., Werner, G.R., Begelman, M.C.: First- principles demonstration of diffusive-advective particle acceleration in kinetic simulations of relativistic plasma turbulence. The Astrophysical Journal893(1), 7 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8...

    2020 doi

  64. [78]

    Nonideal Fields Solve the Injection Problem in Relativistic Reconnection

    Guo, F., Li, X., French, O., Zhang, Q., Daughton, W., Liu, Y.-H., Matthaeus, W., Kilian, P., Johnson, G., Li, H.: Comment on “Nonideal Fields Solve the Injection Problem in Relativistic Reconnection”. Physical Review Let- ters130(18), 189501 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/Phys...

    2023 arXiv

  65. [79]

    Astrophysical Journal Letters 952(1), 1 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdb60

    Totorica, S.R., Zenitani, S., Matsukiyo, S., Machida, M., Sekiguchi, K., Bhat- tacharjee, A.: Exact Calculation of Nonideal Fields Demonstrates Their Dom- inance of Injection in Relativistic Reconnection. Astrophysical Journal Letters 952(1), 1 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/2...

    2023 doi

  66. [80]

    https://arxiv

    Singh, D., French, O., Guo, F., Li, X.: Low-energy Injection and Nonthermal Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Magnetic Turbulence (2024). https://arxiv. org/abs/2404.19181

    2024 arXiv

  67. [81]

    In preparation for submission to the Astrophysical Journal (2024)

    French, O., Werner, G.R., Uzdensky, D.A.: Particle Injection in 3D Relativis- tic Magnetic Reconnection. In preparation for submission to the Astrophysical Journal (2024)

    2024

  68. [82]

    Zhang, Q., Guo, F., Daughton, W., Li, H., Le, A., Phan, T., Desai, M.: Multi- species Ion Acceleration in 3D Magnetic Reconnection with Hybrid-kinetic Simulations (2024)

    2024

  69. [83]

    Astrophysical Journal866(1), 4 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae07b arXiv:1807.03427 [astro-ph.SR]

    Li, X., Guo, F., Li, H., Li, S.: Large-scale Compression Acceleration during Mag- netic Reconnection in a Low-βPlasma. Astrophysical Journal866(1), 4 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae07b arXiv:1807.03427 [astro-ph.SR]

    2018 arXiv

  70. [84]

    Physical Review Let- ters126(13), 135101 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.135101 arXiv:2011.01147 [physics.plasm-ph]

    Arnold, H., Drake, J.F., Swisdak, M., Guo, F., Dahlin, J.T., Chen, B., Fleishman, G., Glesener, L., Kontar, E., Phan, T., Shen, C.: Electron Acceleration during Macroscale Magnetic Reconnection. Physical Review Let- ters126(13), 135101 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLet...

    2021 arXiv

  71. [85]

    arXiv e-prints, 2404–12276 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.12276 arXiv:2404.12276 [astro-ph.HE]

    Seo, J., Guo, F., Li, X., Li, H.: Proton Acceleration in Low-beta Magnetic Recon- nection with Energetic Particle Feedback. arXiv e-prints, 2404–12276 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.12276 arXiv:2404.12276 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 doi arXiv

  72. [86]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics441(3), 845–853 (2005) https://doi

    de Gouveia dal Pino, E.M., Lazarian, A.: Production of the large scale super- luminal ejections of the microquasar GRS 1915+105 by violent magnetic reconnection. Astronomy and Astrophysics441(3), 845–853 (2005) https://doi. org/10.1051/0004-6361:20042590

    2005 doi

  73. [87]

    Astrophysical Journal974(1), 28 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad6e80 arXiv:2408.10445 [astro-ph.SR]

    Murtas, G., Li, X., Guo, F.: Compression Acceleration of Protons and Heavier Ions at the Heliospheric Current Sheet. Astrophysical Journal974(1), 28 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad6e80 arXiv:2408.10445 [astro-ph.SR]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [88]

    Astrophysical Journal 974(1), 74 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad7131 arXiv:2407.10933 [physics.plasm-ph]

    Yin, Z., Drake, J.F., Swisdak, M.: Simultaneous Proton and Electron Ener- gization during Macroscale Magnetic Reconnection. Astrophysical Journal 974(1), 74 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad7131 arXiv:2407.10933 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [89]

    Nonideal Fields Solve the 29 Injection Problem in Relativistic Reconnection

    Guo, F., Li, X., French, O., Daughton, W., Matthaeus, W., Zhang, Q., Liu, Y.-H., Kilian, P., Johnson, G., Li, H.: Comment on “Nonideal Fields Solve the 29 Injection Problem in Relativistic Reconnection”. arXiv (2022). https://doi.org/ 10.48550/ARXIV.2208.03435 . https://arxiv....

    2022 doi arXiv

  76. [90]

    The Astrophysical Journal586(1), 72–78 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1086/367640

    Larrabee, D.A., Lovelace, R.V.E., Romanova, M.M.: Lepton acceleration by rel- ativistic collisionless magnetic reconnection. The Astrophysical Journal586(1), 72–78 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1086/367640

    2003 doi

  77. [91]

    The Astrophysical Journal677(1), 530–544 (2008) https://doi

    Zenitani, S., Hoshino, M.: The role of the guide field in relativistic pair plasma reconnection. The Astrophysical Journal677(1), 530–544 (2008) https://doi. org/10.1086/528708

    2008 doi

  78. [92]

    The Astrophysical Jour- nal782(2), 104 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/782/2/104

    Cerutti, B., Werner, G.R., Uzdensky, D.A., Begelman, M.C.: THREE- DIMENSIONAL RELATIVISTIC PAIR PLASMA RECONNECTION WITH RADIATIVE FEEDBACK IN THE CRAB NEBULA. The Astrophysical Jour- nal782(2), 104 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/782/2/104

    2014 doi

  79. [93]

    Physical Review Let- ters127(18), 185101 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.185101 arXiv:2105.04521 [astro-ph.SR]

    Zhang, Q., Guo, F., Daughton, W., Li, H., Li, X.: Efficient Nonther- mal Ion and Electron Acceleration Enabled by the Flux-Rope Kink Insta- bility in 3D Nonrelativistic Magnetic Reconnection. Physical Review Let- ters127(18), 185101 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.1...

    2021 arXiv

  80. [94]

    Physics of Plasmas30(4) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0139276

    Majeski, S., Ji, H.: Super-fermi acceleration in multiscale MHD reconnection. Physics of Plasmas30(4) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0139276

    2023 doi

  81. [95]

    The Astro- physical Journal700, 16–20 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/ L16

    Drake, J.F., Cassak, P.A., Shay, M.A., Swisdak, M., Quataert, E. The Astro- physical Journal700, 16–20 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/ L16

    2009 doi

  82. [96]

    The Astrophysical Journal 899(1), 52 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba622

    Sironi, L., Beloborodov, A.M.: Kinetic simulations of radiative magnetic recon- nection in the coronae of accreting black holes. The Astrophysical Journal 899(1), 52 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba622

    2020 doi

  83. [97]

    Chernoglazov, A., Hakobyan, H., Philippov, A.A.: High-Energy Radiation and Ion Acceleration in Three-dimensional Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection with Strong Synchrotron Cooling (2023)

    2023

  84. [98]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00979

    Gupta, S., Sridhar, N., Sironi, L.: The Role of Electric Dominance for Particle Injection in Relativistic Reconnection (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00979

    2025 arXiv

  85. [99]

    Physics of Plasmas29(4) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0086316

    Hoshino, M.: Efficiency of nonthermal particle acceleration in magnetic recon- nection. Physics of Plasmas29(4) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0086316

    2022 doi

  86. [100]

    Physics of Plasmas29(5), 052904 30 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0085647

    Oka, M., Phan, T., Øieroset, M., Turner, D., Drake, J., Li, X., Fuselier, S., Ger- shman, D., Giles, B., Ergun, R., Torbert, R., Wei, H., Strangeway, R., Russell, C., Burch, J.: Electron energization and thermal to non- thermal energy parti- tion during earth’s magnetotail rec...

    2022 doi

  87. [101]

    Physics of Plasmas31(5), 052901 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201845 arXiv:2404.15662 [astro-ph.HE]

    Hoshino, M.: A hard energy spectrum in 3D guide-field magnetic reconnection. Physics of Plasmas31(5), 052901 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201845 arXiv:2404.15662 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [102]

    Geophysical Research Letters49(9), 96986 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL09698610.1002/essoar.10508706.1

    Phan, T.D., Verniero, J.L., Larson, D., Lavraud, B., Drake, J.F., Øieroset, M., Eastwood, J.P., Bale, S.D., Livi, R., Halekas, J.S., Whittlesey, P.L., Rahmati, A., Stansby, D., Pulupa, M., MacDowall, R.J., Szabo, P.A., Koval, A., Desai, M., Fuselier, S.A., Velli, M., Hesse, M....

    2022

  89. [103]

    The Astrophysical Journal927(1), 62 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Desai, M.I., Mitchell, D.G., McComas, D.J., Drake, J.F., Phan, T., Szalay, J.R., Roelof, E.C., Giacalone, J., Hill, M.E., Christian, E.R., Schwadron, N.A., McNutt, R.L., Wiedenbeck, M.E., Joyce, C., Cohen, C.M.S., Davis, A.J., Krim- igis, S.M., Leske, R.A., Matthaeus, W.H., Ma...

    2022

  90. [104]

    Astrophysical Journal898(2), 154 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ab9ab6

    Ergun, R.E., Ahmadi, N., Kromyda, L., Schwartz, S.J., Chasapis, A., Hoili- joki, S., Wilder, F.D., Stawarz, J.E., Goodrich, K.A., Turner, D.L., Cohen, I.J., Bingham, S.T., Holmes, J.C., Nakamura, R., Pucci, F., Torbert, R.B., Burch, J.L., Lindqvist, P.-A., Strangeway, R.J., Le...

    2020 doi

  91. [105]

    Astrophysical Journal932(2), 92 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac6efe arXiv:2205.04946 [astro-ph.SR] 31 Fig

    Li, X., Guo, F., Chen, B., Shen, C., Glesener, L.: Modeling Electron Accelera- tion and Transport in the Early Impulsive Phase of the 2017 September 10th Solar Flare. Astrophysical Journal932(2), 92 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac6efe arXiv:2205.04946 [astro-ph.SR...

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.