Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Enhancing Q&A Text Retrieval with Ranking Models: Benchmarking, fine-tuning and deploying Rerankers for RAG

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.07691 v1 pith:Z6WF2NUW submitted 2024-09-12 cs.IR cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.CLcs.LG
keywords rankingmodelsaccuracyretrievaltextsystemsapplicationsbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ranking models play a crucial role in enhancing overall accuracy of text retrieval systems. These multi-stage systems typically utilize either dense embedding models or sparse lexical indices to retrieve relevant passages based on a given query, followed by ranking models that refine the ordering of the candidate passages by its relevance to the query. This paper benchmarks various publicly available ranking models and examines their impact on ranking accuracy. We focus on text retrieval for question-answering tasks, a common use case for Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems. Our evaluation benchmarks include models some of which are commercially viable for industrial applications. We introduce a state-of-the-art ranking model, NV-RerankQA-Mistral-4B-v3, which achieves a significant accuracy increase of ~14% compared to pipelines with other rerankers. We also provide an ablation study comparing the fine-tuning of ranking models with different sizes, losses and self-attention mechanisms. Finally, we discuss challenges of text retrieval pipelines with ranking models in real-world industry applications, in particular the trade-offs among model size, ranking accuracy and system requirements like indexing and serving latency / throughput.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MM-R5: MultiModal Reasoning-Enhanced ReRanker via Reinforcement Learning for Document Retrieval

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MM-R5, a 7B multimodal re-ranker trained with SFT and GRPO, achieves state-of-the-art page-level recall on MMDocIR by generating per-page reasoning chains.

  2. LLMs as Better Recommenders with Natural Language Collaborative Signals: A Self-Assessing Retrieval Approach

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SCORE retrieves similar users' behaviors, uses an LLM self-assessment to rerank them, and injects the top ones in natural language into an LLM prompt, improving recommendation accuracy on two datasets.

Pith tools