HE2159-0551: a very metal-poor peculiar low Ba giant -- a candidate from the LMS-1/Wukong

A. Schichtel; C. J. Hansen; D. H. Plonka

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 153 references

HE2159-0551: a very metal-poor peculiar low Ba giant -- a candidate from the LMS-1/Wukong

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that HE2159-0551, a very metal-poor giant, has a heavy-element pattern that rules out both the main r-process and s-process, pointing to a weak-r or νp-process in the LMS-1/Wukong merger system.

desk verdict Solid abundance work with a merger claim the abstract overstates; the body is more careful than the headline. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07091 v1 pith:ZGQHVACC submitted 2025-09-08 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

A. Schichtel , D. H. Plonka , C. J. Hansen This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA

keywords verymetal-poorstarsr-processs-processbariumabundancesLMS-1/Wukonggalacticmergersstellarnucleosynthesis

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that HE2159-0551 is a chemodynamic link: a very metal-poor giant whose chemistry records a peculiar nucleosynthesis channel and whose orbit records an early galaxy merger. The star shows a striking pattern—barium is low, europium is not detected, but strontium, yttrium, and zirconium are present—so the paper argues that neither the main r-process nor the s-process formed its heavy elements, and that a weak-r or νp-process in a supernova enriched the gas of the LMS-1/Wukong system. If true, this single star constrains both how the earliest metal-poor dwarf galaxies were enriched and how their debris was dynamically mixed into the Milky Way's thick disk.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two linked tools: the E-Lz (energy versus angular momentum) plane and action-space selection criteria used to assign the star to LMS-1/Wukong, and the measured heavy-element pattern, especially the low [Ba/Fe] with unremarkable Sr, Y, and Zr, which is compared against r-rich and r-poor reference stars and AGB nucleosynthesis models. The combination lets the authors argue that the star's orbit places it in an accreted system whose gas was enriched by a process that made Sr-Zr but not Ba.

What would settle it

A precise astrometric distance or revised RV that moves HE2159-0551 outside the LMS-1/Wukong E-Lz box, or a deeper spectrum that detects Eu at [Eu/Fe] near 0.5 dex, would refute the claimed merger connection and the suppressed-r-process interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports that HE2159-0551, a very metal-poor giant at [Fe/H]=-2.60, has a heavy-element pattern that none of the standard neutron-capture processes can explain: barium is strongly depleted ([Ba/Fe]=-0.84 dex), europium is only an upper limit, while strontium, yttrium, and zirconium are near or above solar-scaled levels. The paper interprets this as enrichment by a weak-r or νp-process that produced Sr-Zr but not Ba, mixed over a low-level r-process background. The star's orbit, falling in the LMS-1/Wukong selection region in the E-Lz plane and action diamond while being kinematically distinct from the Helmi stream, makes the paper propose it as a candidate member of that ancient low

Load-bearing premise

The star's membership in LMS-1/Wukong rests on selection boxes in energy-angular-momentum space; the star sits at the prograde edge, so if those boxes misclassify thick-disk stars as merger debris, the merger connection collapses even though the abundance peculiarity survives.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The star becomes a chemical tag: low barium with normal Sr-Y-Zr can identify LMS-1/Wukong members even before orbital analysis.
The absence of strong europium at [Fe/H] ~ -2.6 implies that neutron-star mergers did not dominate r-process enrichment in this low-mass system, placing constraints on merger delay times.
The star's prograde, thick-disk-like orbit indicates that accreted debris can be dynamically heated and radially migrated into the thick disk, creating overlap zones between merger remnants and in-situ populations.
The abundance pattern rules out AGB/s-process pollution in this star, supporting a formation environment with little or no asymptotic-giant-branch enrichment.
If low Ba is systemic to LMS-1/Wukong, the merger is a distinct nucleosynthetic environment from ultrafaint dwarfs like Reticulum II, which show high r-process enrichment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension: survey other candidate LMS-1/Wukong members for Ba, Sr, and Eu; if low Ba persists across a dozen stars, it becomes a robust chemical fingerprint independent of orbit.
The paper leaves open whether the weak-r/νp-process picture can be reproduced by detailed nucleosynthesis models; applying such models to the full measured pattern, including limits, would sharpen the claim.
If the star is genuinely a transition object, then the LMS-1/Wukong merger is nearer to the disk plane than the E-Lz box implies, and a kinematic selection may need to include prograde thick-disk stars to recover the system's full debris.
The inability to detect elements heavier than Zr in this spectrum hints that such patterns may be common in very metal-poor stars but missed because Ba and Eu are the default diagnostics.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The one thing you should know up front: this is a careful single-star abundance analysis, but the LMS-1/Wukong connection is not secured. The abstract says the star is 'connected' to that merger; the body says 'potential.' Those two statements are not the same.

What is actually new: the paper adds K, V, Co, Ni, Zn, Zr, and Y abundances for HE2159-0551, confirms the low Ba signature, and computes orbits. The methods are transparent and reproducible in the senses that matter: line lists and references are explicit, the PyMoogi pipeline is standard, the F.R.U.I.T.Y comparison is external, and the Monte Carlo orbital sampling is done the right way. That is real work, and the abundance table is useful to anyone working on very metal-poor heavy-element patterns.

Now the soft spots. The kinematic membership is the load-bearing step and the least secure part. The 68% Monte Carlo intervals in Table 3 straddle the Horta et al. cuts (Lz from 54 to 1715 against a 200-1000 window, e from 0.19 to 0.67 against 0.40-0.70). The star sits at the prograde edge of the LMS-1 region. The paper leans on an unpublished, manually defined ellipse from Monty et al. (in prep.), and it explicitly puts the star in a transition/overlap zone with the thick disk. No membership probability is reported; the 62 background stars passing the Horta cuts are mentioned, but we never learn what fraction of field stars would pass by chance. So the abstract's 'connected' is not what the kinematics demonstrate. The nucleosynthetic interpretation, weak-r or nu-p producing Sr-Zr but not Ba, is plausible, but it hangs on one firm Ba detection and several upper/lower limits. The lack of NLTE discussion for Ba II is a real gap, though not fatal. To their credit, the authors themselves acknowledge the Al/Mn abundance planes are not diagnostic and defer a definitive conclusion in Sect. 7; the careful hedges are in the body, just not in the abstract.

Bottom line: cite this for the abundances, not for the membership. It deserves peer review because the abundance analysis is solid and the kinematic question is important, but a referee should push for a quantitative membership probability, access to the Monty criteria, and an abstract that matches the body. As it stands, conditional accept with major revision.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a high-resolution UVES abundance and kinematic analysis of the very metal-poor giant HE2159-0551. Using a 1D LTE analysis with PyMoogi and Kurucz model atmospheres, the authors derive stellar parameters, abundances or limits for 23 elements, and compute orbits using Gaia DR3 astrometry, a new radial velocity, and the McMillan potential. They find [Fe/H] ≈ −2.60, a low Ba abundance ([Ba/Fe] ≈ −0.84), and an upper limit on Eu, and they place the star near the LMS-1/Wukong selection region in action/energy space. The paper concludes that HE2159-0551 is a candidate member of LMS-1/Wukong and that its heavy-element pattern cannot be explained by the main r- or s-process, possibly reflecting weak r- or νp-process enrichment in that accreted system.

Significance. If the kinematic association is secure, this star would be a valuable chemodynamic tracer: it would link a very metal-poor, thick-disk-like orbit to LMS-1/Wukong and add to the small sample of low-Ba stars proposed for that structure. The paper has clear strengths: the line list and atomic data references are explicit, stellar parameters follow standard excitation/ionization balance, the F.R.U.I.T.Y. AGB comparison is an external benchmark, multi-epoch RVs are used to address binarity, and orbital uncertainties are propagated with Monte Carlo sampling. However, the merger membership and the nucleosynthetic attribution are both less secure than the abstract suggests. The abundance peculiarity (low Ba, suppressed Eu) is comparatively robust, but the specific weak-r/νp scenario and the connection to LMS-1/Wukong need quantitative support beyond what is currently presented.

major comments (4)

[§5.3, Table 3] The 68% Monte Carlo intervals for Lz, e, and Zmax cross the Horta et al. (2022) membership cuts used to claim LMS-1/Wukong membership: Lz = 855(+860/−801) gives 54–1715 kpc km/s vs. the 200–1000 cut; e = 0.39(+0.28/−0.20) gives 0.19–0.67 vs. e > 0.40; Zmax = 5.8(+4.5/−3.3) gives 2.5–10.3 kpc vs. |Z| > 3 kpc. The paper does not report the fraction of Monte Carlo orbits satisfying all cuts or the interloper fraction from thick-disk/halo stars. Thus “fits the criteria” (Sect. 5.3), “connected” (Abstract), and the title’s “candidate” overstate the evidence. Please add a membership probability and/or a contamination estimate, or reframe the star as “kinematically consistent with the outer edge of LMS-1/Wukong.”
[§5.3, Fig. 2] The alternative LMS-1/Wukong selection is an unpublished, manually defined ellipse from Monty et al. (in prep.), and the paper itself places the star at the prograde edge and in a possible transition/overlap zone with the thick disk. A manual, unpublished region cannot serve as a load-bearing membership criterion. Please use only published definitions or, if the Monty et al. selection is essential, document its construction and provide a quantitative comparison with a background thick-disk sample in E–Lz and action space.
[§6.5–§6.6, §7] The only firmly detected heavy n-capture element is Ba (three lines); Eu is an upper limit and Sr is a lower limit. The conclusion that “neither the main r- nor s-process can explain the derived abundance pattern” is stronger than the data justify: the pattern is also consistent with an r-poor VMP star, as the authors’ own comparison with HD122563 shows. The weak-r/νp scenario is one plausible interpretation, not a unique one. Please separate the robust abundance peculiarity (low Ba, suppressed Eu) from the speculative process attribution, and soften the abstract and conclusions accordingly.
[Abstract vs. §5.3, §7] The abstract states that HE2159-0551 is “connected” to LMS-1/Wukong, whereas the body describes a “potential connection” and a “transition region or overlap zone” with the thick disk. These statements are inconsistent, and the stronger one is not supported by the quantitative analysis. Please harmonize the wording so that each claim matches the evidence level.

minor comments (6)

[Tables 4 and 5] The Ba uncertainty is listed as ±0.12 dex in Table 4 and ±0.20 dex in Table 5; Sr has the opposite inconsistency (0.20 vs. 0.10 dex). Please harmonize the quoted uncertainties.
[§5.2] The formula for vtot contains “U2LSR” twice; the third term should be W_LSR^2.
[§5.1] Please state explicitly the adopted solar position/velocity and LSR values; citing Bennett & Bovy (2018) and Schönrich et al. (2010) without giving the numbers reduces reproducibility.
[Appendix D] The F.R.U.I.T.Y. comparison uses Z = 0.00005 ([Fe/H] ≈ −2.40), whereas the star’s [Fe/H] is −2.60. State how this metallicity offset affects the conclusion that no AGB model matches the observed pattern.
[Fig. 4] The blue “without element” line in the synthesis panels is not defined in the main text. Please clarify in the caption or text what this line represents.
[References] Monty et al. (in prep.) is cited but is not in the reference list. If it is not publicly available, mark it as a private communication or preprint and state its availability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Abundance analysis is self-contained; the only mildly circular element is the manually defined Monty et al. ellipse used to support LMS-1/Wukong membership.

self definitional [Section 5.3, Fig. 2 (dashed ellipse); echoed in Sect. 6.5]
"we also show an alternative selection for LMS-1/Wukong, based on unpublished criteria from Monty et al. (in prep.), indicated by the dashed ellipse in Fig. 2. This region encloses the typical locus of their LMS-1/Wukong candidates in the E-Lz space and is manually defined to capture their dynamical clustering."

The dashed ellipse is constructed by drawing a boundary around the pre-identified LMS-1/Wukong candidates ('manually defined to capture their dynamical clustering'). Showing that HE2159-0551 'appears within the Wukong region' is therefore a restatement of the ellipse's definition rather than an independent membership test. This is used as supporting evidence for the chemical connection ('The low Ba abundance ... may be a tracer for LMS-1'). The primary Horta et al. (2022) box is an external, published selection, so this step is auxiliary rather than the sole load-bearing link.

full rationale

No circularity was found in the central abundance analysis. Stellar parameters are derived by standard Fe I/Fe II excitation and ionization balance, abundances are measured from line synthesis and equivalent widths, and the F.R.U.I.T.Y AGB comparison, Gaia astrometry, and GALAH background sample are all external benchmarks. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no self-citation chain is used to force the nucleosynthetic interpretation. The only definitional concern is the unpublished Monty et al. ellipse: it is manually drawn around the cluster locus and then used as evidence that the star lies in the Wukong region. However, the paper also applies the published Horta et al. (2022) cuts and appropriately hedges the merger connection ('potential connection', 'we defer providing a definitive conclusion'), so the overall derivation is not forced. The large Monte-Carlo uncertainties in Table 3 straddling the Horta box are a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity. Score 2 reflects the minor, non-central definitional issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The central claim depends on adopted stellar parameters derived from the spectra, the assumed 1D LTE framework, the McMillan potential for orbit integration, and the validity of the LMS-1/Wukong selection criteria, one of which is unpublished and manually defined.

free parameters (4)

Effective temperature T_eff = 5000 +/- 140 K
Derived by requiring a flat slope of Fe I and Fe II abundances versus excitation potential; all element abundances, especially Ba, are conditional on this value.
Surface gravity log g = 1.80 +/- 0.40 dex
Set by Fe I/Fe II ionization equilibrium; strongly influences ionized species such as Ba II and Sc II.
Microturbulence xi = 2.40 +/- 0.30 km/s
Set by removing the line-strength trend in Fe I; affects the saturation correction and derived abundances of strong lines like Ba II.
Metallicity [Fe/H] = -2.60 +/- 0.20 dex
Determined from Fe I equivalent widths; anchors all [X/Fe] ratios and the comparison to nucleosynthesis models.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption 1D LTE and Kurucz ATLAS9 model atmospheres describe the stellar atmosphere well enough that derived abundances, especially Ba II, are not systematically biased.
PyMoogi/MOOG analysis in Sect. 4 and 6; NLTE effects are discussed for Fe I but not for Ba II, the key abundance.
domain assumption The McMillan (2017) Galactic potential is a valid representation for orbit integration over 10 Gyr.
Sect. 5.1; orbital parameters and the LMS-1 membership interpretation depend on this potential choice.
ad hoc to paper The Horta et al. (2022) selection criteria and the unpublished Monty et al. (in prep.) ellipse correctly identify LMS-1/Wukong members.
Sect. 5.3; the membership claim uses these criteria, and the Monty ellipse is manually defined and not publicly available.
domain assumption Gaia DR3 astrometry and the Bailer-Jones distance are accurate, with no significant unrecognized systematic errors.
Sect. 5.1 and Table C.1; orbital parameters and membership depend on distance and proper motions.
domain assumption Internal mixing on the red giant branch affects C and N but not the heavy elements Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, and Eu, so the observed heavy-element abundances reflect the birth composition.
Sect. 6.1 and 6.6, citing de Melo et al. (2024); this underpins the nucleosynthetic interpretation.
domain assumption Consistent RVs over the observed epochs exclude binarity.
Sect. 3; only a few epochs are available, so long-period or low-inclination binaries cannot be fully excluded.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HE2159-0551: a very metal-poor peculiar low Ba giant -- a candidate from the LMS-1/Wukong." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZGQHVACC

@misc{pith2026250907091,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HE2159-0551: a very metal-poor peculiar low Ba giant -- a candidate from the LMS-1/Wukong},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZGQHVACC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07091}
}

abstract

We present a comprehensive spectroscopic and kinematic analysis of the very metal-poor ([Fe/H] = -2.60 $\pm$ 0.20 dex) giant star HE2159-0551. By investigating the star's chemodynamic characteristics, we seek to address its formation, evolution, and role in the chemical enrichment of the early cosmos and the possible connection to known merger events. From high-resolution data we perform a one dimension, local thermodynamic equilibrium analysis using PyMoogi. We conduct a detailed abundance analysis of 23 elements (C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn, Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, and Eu), allowing us to derive abundances or place limits. Finally, we compute orbital parameters to investigate the kinematics and thus the nucleosynthetic origin of HE2159-0551. The analysis yields significant insights into the chemical composition of HE2159-0551, highlighting its peculiarities among very metal-poor stars. The star shows signs of internal mixing and a peculiar abundance pattern, particular regarding the heavy elements. We find a low Ba abundance (s-process element) and a suppressed contamination of r-process elements, even though r-process enrichment may be expected in very metal-poor stars. The orbital parameters and kinematic properties indicate that HE2159-0551 is a thick disc star, connected to the old and metal-poor LMS-1/Wukong progenitor resulting from an early merger. Our kinematic analysis suggests a potential connection of HE2159-0551 to the merger LMS-1/Wukong. We conclude that the nucleosynthesis processes responsible for the star's enrichment in heavy elements are different from those observed in many other metal-poor stars as neither the main r- nor s-process can explain the derived abundance pattern. A possible weak-r or $\nu$p-process forming Sr-Zr but not Ba might have mixed into a low level of underlying r-process material in the low-mass LMS-1/Wukong system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07091 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Orbital properties of HE2159-0551 (red star) compared to known stellar substructures in the Milky Way. Left: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Both studies provide a comprehensive range of abun [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: [X/Fe] versus atomic number Z for HE2159-0551 (this work: red stars), with uncertainties. Data points with a downwards or upwards facing arrow are upper or lower limits, respectively. HE2159-0551 is compared to Hansen et al. (2015, black), Hansen et al. (2018b, blue), …

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Top: Line synthesis of Sr, Ba, and Eu with best fit indicated in red: [Sr/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: [C/N] ratio versus temperature of HE2159-0551 (red) in comparison to the CERES project stars (de Melo et al. 2024, black), distinguishing between mixed (below the gray line) and unmixed (above the gray line) stars [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Comparison of HE2159-0551 (this work, red), the CERES project sample (Lombardo et al. 2022, 2025, black), and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Non-detection of Gd. The perpendicular gray line indi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

153 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

[1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...
[2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....
[3]

@esa (Ref

\@ifclassloaded agu2001 natbib The agu2001 class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later remove the command natbib from the document \@ifclassloaded aguplus natbib The aguplus class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later rem...
[4]

@stdbsttrue NAT@ctr \@lbibitem[ NAT@ctr ] \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 [ @natanchorstart #2\@extra@b@citeb \@biblabel @num @natanchorend] @ifcmd#1(@)(@)\@nil #2 @lbibitem\@undefined @lbibitem\@lbibitem \@lbibitem[#1]#2 @lb...
[5]

@open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifundefined NAT@sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifundefined bib@heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel NAT@ctr \@bibsetup #1 NAT@ctr 0 @openbib .11em \@plus.33em \@minus.07em 4000 4000 `\.=1000 \@...
[6]

P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T

Abbott , B. P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T. D., et al. 2017, , 119, 161101

2017
[7]

S., Belokurov , V., Myeong , G

Aguado , D. S., Belokurov , V., Myeong , G. C., et al. 2021, , 908, L8

2021
[8]

2023, PhD thesis

Alencastro Puls, A. 2023, PhD thesis

2023

Show all 153 references

[9]

C., Christlieb, N., et al

Aoki, W., Beers, T. C., Christlieb, N., et al. 2007, , 655, 492

2007
[10]

& Bliss, J

Arcones, A. & Bliss, J. 2014, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 41, 044005

2014
[11]

& Thielemann, F.-K

Arcones, A. & Thielemann, F.-K. 2023, A&AR, 31, 1

2023
[12]

J., & Scott, P

Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

2009
[13]

M., Lim , P

Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167

2022
[14]

M., Sip o cz , B

Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123

2018
[15]

P., Tollerud , E

Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33

2013
[16]

Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Rybizki , J., Fouesneau , M., Demleitner , M., & Andrae , R. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Distances to 1.47 billion stars in Gaia EDR3 (Bailer-Jones+, 2021) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: I/352. Originally published in: 2021AJ....161..147B

2021
[17]

S., Christlieb, N., Beers, T

Barklem, P. S., Christlieb, N., Beers, T. C., et al. 2005, , 439, 129

2005
[18]

& Gehren, T

Baum \"u ller, D. & Gehren, T. 1997, , v. 325, p. 1088-1098, 325, 1088

1997
[19]

Beers, T. C. & Christlieb, N. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 531

2005
[20]

2017, , 848, 125

Belmonte, M., Pickering, J., Ruffoni, M., et al. 2017, , 848, 125

2017
[21]

W., Koposov , S

Belokurov , V., Erkal , D., Evans , N. W., Koposov , S. E., & Deason , A. J. 2018, , 478, 611

2018
[22]

& Bovy, J

Bennett, M. & Bovy, J. 2018, , 482, 1417

2018
[23]

, & Lundström, I

Bensby , Feltzing, S. , & Lundström, I. 2003, A&A, 410, 527

2003
[24]

, & Oey, M

Bensby , Feltzing, S. , & Oey, M. S. 2014, A&A, 562, A71

2014
[25]

2011, in J

Bergemann , M., Lind , K., Collet , R., & Asplund , M. 2011, in J. Phys. Conf. Ser., Vol. 328, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 012002

2011
[26]

2012, , 427, 27

Bergemann, M., Lind, K., Collet, R., Magic, Z., & Asplund, M. 2012, , 427, 27

2012
[27]

Bergeson, S. D. & Lawler, J. 1993

1993
[28]

2011, , 414, 3350

Bi \'e mont, \'E ., Blagoev, K., Engstr \"o m, L., et al. 2011, , 414, 3350

2011
[29]

R., Bershady , M

Blanton , M. R., Bershady , M. A., Abolfathi , B., et al. 2017, , 154, 28

2017
[30]

P., Conroy , C., et al

Bonaca , A., Naidu , R. P., Conroy , C., et al. 2021, , 909, L26

2021
[31]

2015, , 216, 29

Bovy, J. 2015, , 216, 29

2015
[32]

X., et al

Buder, S., Kos, J., Wang, E. X., et al. 2024, The GALAH Survey: Data Release 4

2024
[33]

M., Burbidge, G

Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. 1957, RMP, 29, 547

1957
[34]

& Kurucz , R

Castelli , F. & Kurucz , R. L. 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. N. Piskunov , W. W. Weiss , & D. F. Gray , A20

2003
[35]

2004, , 416, 1117

Cayrel, R., Depagne, E., Spite, M., et al. 2004, , 416, 1117

2004
[36]

C., Barklem, P

Christlieb, N., Beers, T. C., Barklem, P. S., et al. 2004, , 428, 1027

2004
[37]

J., Sneden, C., Lawler, J

Cowan, J. J., Sneden, C., Lawler, J. E., et al. 2021, RMP, 93

2021
[38]

2011, , 197, 17

Cristallo, S., Piersanti, L., Straniero, O., et al. 2011, , 197, 17

2011
[39]

Da Silveira, C., Barbuy, B., Fria c a, A. C. S., et al. 2018, , 614, A149

2018
[40]

2020, , 493, 5195

Das, P., Hawkins, K., & Jofré, P. 2020, , 493, 5195

2020
[41]

F., Lombardo, L., Puls, A

de Melo, R. F., Lombardo, L., Puls, A. A., et al. 2024, , 691, A220

2024
[42]

2000, in SPIE Conference Series, Vol

Dekker , H., D'Odorico , S., Kaufer , A., Delabre , B., & Kotzlowski , H. 2000, in SPIE Conference Series, Vol. 4008, Optical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and Detectors, ed. M. Iye & A. F. Moorwood , 534--545

2000
[43]

2019, , 243, 33

Den Hartog, E., Lawler, J., Sneden, C., Cowan, J., & Brukhovesky, A. 2019, , 243, 33

2019
[44]

2021, , 255, 27

Den Hartog, E., Lawler, J., Sneden, C., et al. 2021, , 255, 27

2021
[45]

2023, , 265, 42

Den Hartog, E., Lawler, J., Sneden, C., Roederer, I., & Cowan, J. 2023, , 265, 42

2023
[46]

E., Sobeck, J

Den Hartog, E., Lawler, J. E., Sobeck, J. S., Sneden, C., & Cowan, J. J. 2011, , 194, 35

2011
[47]

2014, , 215, 23

Den Hartog, E., Ruffoni, M., Lawler, J., et al. 2014, , 215, 23

2014
[48]

2017, , 604, A128

Duffau, S., Caffau, E., Sbordone, L., et al. 2017, , 604, A128

2017
[49]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.01982

Fitzpatrick , M., Placco , V., Bolton , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.01982

2024 arXiv
[50]

2007, , 476, 935

Fran c ois, P., Depagne, E., Hill, V., et al. 2007, , 476, 935

2007
[51]

2004, , 421, 613

Fran c ois, P., Matteucci, F., Cayrel, R., et al. 2004, , 421, 613

2004
[52]

2008, in Astron

Frebel , A. 2008, in Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Ser., Vol. 393, New Horizons in Astronomy, ed. A. Frebel , J. R. Maund , J. Shen , & M. H. Siegel , 63

2008
[53]

& Bland-Hawthorn , J

Freeman , K. & Bland-Hawthorn , J. 2002, , 40, 487

2002
[54]

2012, , 538, L2

Frischknecht, U., Hirschi, R., & Thielemann, F.-K. 2012, , 538, L2

2012
[55]

o hlich, C., Martinez-Pinedo, G., Liebend \

Fr \"o hlich, C., Martinez-Pinedo, G., Liebend \"o rfer, M., et al. 2006, PRL, 96, 142502

2006
[56]

& Rauscher , T

Fr \"o hlich , C. & Rauscher , T. 2012, in AIP, Vol. 1484, Origin of Matter and Evolution of Galaxies 2011, ed. S. Kubono , T. Hayakawa , T. Kajino , H. Miyatake , T. Motobayashi , & K. Nomoto , 232--239

2012
[57]

P., Rich, R

Fulbright, J. P., Rich, R. M., & Castro, S. 2004, , 612, 447

2004
[58]

Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, , 595, A1

2016
[59]

Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1

2023
[60]

A., Helmi , A., Brown , A

G \'o mez , F. A., Helmi , A., Brown , A. G. A., & Li , Y.-S. 2010, , 408, 935

2010
[61]

1989, (ISSN 0004-6361), vol

Gratton, R. 1989, (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 208, no. 1-2, Jan. 1989, p. 171-178., 208, 171

1989
[62]

2012, in Progress in Solar/Stellar Physics with Helio-and Asteroseismology

Grevesse, N., Asplund, M., Sauval, A., & Scott, P. 2012, in Progress in Solar/Stellar Physics with Helio-and Asteroseismology. Proceedings of a Fujihara Seminar held at Hakone, Vol. 41

2012
[63]

J., Koch, A., & Grebel, E

Hanke, M., Hansen, C. J., Koch, A., & Grebel, E. K. 2018, , 619, A134

2018
[64]

1982, ApJ, Part 1, vol

Hannaford, P., Lowe, R., Grevesse, N., Biemont, E., & Whaling, W. 1982, ApJ, Part 1, vol. 261, Oct. 15, 1982, p. 736-746., 261, 736

1982
[65]

2014, , 797, 123

Hansen, C., Montes, F., & Arcones, A. 2014, , 797, 123

2014
[66]

Hansen, C. J. 2011, PhD thesis, Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität München

2011
[67]

J., El-Souri, M., Monaco, L., et al

Hansen, C. J., El-Souri, M., Monaco, L., et al. 2018 a , , 855, 83

2018
[68]

J., Hansen, T

Hansen, C. J., Hansen, T. T., Koch, A., et al. 2019, , 623, A128

2019
[69]

J., Koch, A., Mashonkina, L., et al

Hansen, C. J., Koch, A., Mashonkina, L., et al. 2020, , 643, A49

2020
[70]

J., Nordström, B., Hansen, T

Hansen, C. J., Nordström, B., Hansen, T. T., et al. 2016, , 588, A37

2016
[71]

J., Primas, F., Hartman, H., et al

Hansen, C. J., Primas, F., Hartman, H., et al. 2012, , 545, A31

2012
[72]

2015, , 807, 173

Hansen, T., Hansen, C., Christlieb, N., et al. 2015, , 807, 173

2015
[73]

T., Holmbeck, E

Hansen, T. T., Holmbeck, E. M., Beers, T. C., et al. 2018 b , , 858, 92

2018
[74]

R., Millman, K

Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nat, 585, 357

2020
[75]

2018, , 478, 1795

Hartwig, T., Yoshida, N., Magg, M., et al. 2018, , 478, 1795

2018
[76]

2015, , 453, 758

Hawkins, K., Jofré, P., Masseron, T., & Gilmore, G. 2015, , 453, 758

2015
[77]

2009, , 504, 511

Hayek, W., Wiesendahl, U., Christlieb, N., et al. 2009, , 504, 511

2009
[78]

H., et al

Helmi , A., Babusiaux , C., Koppelman , H. H., et al. 2018, Nat, 563, 85

2018
[79]

& de Zeeuw , P

Helmi , A. & de Zeeuw , P. T. 2000, , 319, 657

2000
[80]

Helmi , A., White , S. D. M., de Zeeuw , P. T., & Zhao , H. 1999, Nat, 402, 53

1999
[81]

E., Pickering , J

Holmes , C. E., Pickering , J. C., Ruffoni , M. P., et al. 2016, , 224, 35

2016
[82]

2006, , 643, 1180

Honda, S., Aoki, W., Ishimaru, Y., Wanajo, S., & Ryan, S. 2006, , 643, 1180

2006
[83]

2004, , 607, 474

Honda, S., Aoki, W., Kajino, T., et al. 2004, , 607, 474

2004
[84]

P., Mackereth, J

Horta, D., Schiavon, R. P., Mackereth, J. T., et al. 2022, , 520, 5671

2022
[85]

2018, Int

Hotokezaka, K., Beniamini, P., & Piran, T. 2018, Int. J. Mod. Phys D, 27, 1842005

2018
[86]

Hunter, J. D. 2007, CiSE, 9, 90

2007
[87]

2017, , 604, A106

Jean-Baptiste , I., Di Matteo , P., Haywood , M., et al. 2017, , 604, A106

2017
[88]

P., Frebel, A., Simon, J

Ji, A. P., Frebel, A., Simon, J. D., & Chiti, A. 2016, , 830, 93

2016
[89]

Koch, A., Hansen, T., Feltzing, S., & Wilkinson, M. I. 2013, , 780, 91

2013
[90]

K., Zucker, D

Koch, A., McWilliam, A., Grebel, E. K., Zucker, D. B., & Belokurov, V. 2008, , 688, L13

2008
[91]

H., Bos , R

Koppelman , H. H., Bos , R. O. Y., & Helmi , A. 2020, , 642, L18

2020
[92]

H., Helmi , A., Massari , D., Price-Whelan , A

Koppelman , H. H., Helmi , A., Massari , D., Price-Whelan , A. M., & Starkenburg , T. K. 2019 a , , 631, L9

2019
[93]

H., Helmi , A., Massari , D., Price-Whelan , A

Koppelman , H. H., Helmi , A., Massari , D., Price-Whelan , A. M., & Starkenburg , T. K. 2019 b , , 631, L9

2019
[94]

H., Helmi , A., Massari , D., Roelenga , S., & Bastian , U

Koppelman , H. H., Helmi , A., Massari , D., Roelenga , S., & Bastian , U. 2019 c , , 625, A5

2019
[95]

J., Grundahl, F., Richard, O., et al

Korn, A. J., Grundahl, F., Richard, O., et al. 2006, Nat, 442, 657

2006
[96]

J., Mashonkina , L., Richard , O., et al

Korn , A. J., Mashonkina , L., Richard , O., et al. 2008, in AIP, Vol. 990, First Stars III, ed. B. W. O'Shea & A. Heger , 167--168

2008
[97]

Kurucz, R. L. 1970, SAO Special Report\# 309 (1970), 309

1970
[98]

2001, , 563, 1075

Lawler, J., Wickliffe, M., Den Hartog, E., & Sneden, C. 2001, , 563, 1075

2001
[99]

E., Feigenson, T., Sneden, C., Cowan, J

Lawler, J. E., Feigenson, T., Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., & Nave, G. 2018, , 238, 7

2018
[100]

E., Guzman, A., Wood, M., Sneden, C., & Cowan, J

Lawler, J. E., Guzman, A., Wood, M., Sneden, C., & Cowan, J. J. 2013, , 205, 11

2013
[101]

E., Sneden, C., Nave, G., et al

Lawler, J. E., Sneden, C., Nave, G., et al. 2019, , 241, 21

2019
[102]

E., Wood , M

Lawler , J. E., Wood , M. P., Den Hartog , E. A., et al. 2014, , 215, 20

2014
[103]

S., Ji , A

Li , T. S., Ji , A. P., Pace , A. B., et al. 2022, , 928, 30

2022
[104]

P., Naidu , R

Limberg , G., Ji , A. P., Naidu , R. P., et al. 2024, , 530, 2512

2024
[105]

2006, , 456, 1181

Ljung, G., Nilsson, H., Asplund, M., & Johansson, S. 2006, , 456, 1181

2006
[106]

2022, , 665, A10

Lombardo, L., Bonifacio, P., Fran c ois, P., et al. 2022, , 665, A10

2022
[107]

2025, , 693, A293

Lombardo, L., Hansen, C., Rizzuti, F., et al. 2025, , 693, A293

2025
[108]

2022, , 661, A140

Magg, E., Bergemann, M., Serenelli, A., et al. 2022, , 661, A140

2022
[109]

2006, , 367, 754

Malcheva, G., Blagoev, K., Mayo, R., et al. 2006, , 367, 754

2006
[110]

2022, in AAS/DDA Meeting, Vol

Malhan , K. 2022, in AAS/DDA Meeting, Vol. 54, AAS/DDA Meeting, 203.02

2022
[111]

A., et al

Malhan , K., Yuan , Z., Ibata , R. A., et al. 2021, , 920, 51

2021
[112]

F., Ibata , R

Martin , N. F., Ibata , R. A., Starkenburg , E., et al. 2022, , 516, 5331

2022
[113]

2017, , 608, A89

Mashonkina, L., Jablonka, P., Sitnova, T., Pakhomov, Y., & North, P. 2017, , 608, A89

2017
[114]

2014, , 571, A47

Masseron, T., Plez, B., Van Eck, S., et al. 2014, , 571, A47

2014
[115]

H., et al

Matsuno , T., Dodd , E., Koppelman , H. H., et al. 2022 a , , 665, A46

2022
[116]

H., Helmi , A., et al

Matsuno , T., Koppelman , H. H., Helmi , A., et al. 2022 b , , 661, A103

2022
[117]

McMillan , P. J. 2017, , 465, 76

2017
[118]

S., Hill, V., Barbuy, B., et al

Mello, C. S., Hill, V., Barbuy, B., et al. 2014, , 565, A93

2014
[119]

2007, , 671, 1685

Montes, F., Beers, T., Cowan, J., et al. 2007, , 671, 1685

2007
[120]

& Bonifacio, P

Mucciarelli, A. & Bonifacio, P. 2020, , 640, A87

2020
[121]

R., & Lapenna, E

Mucciarelli, A., Pancino, E., Lovisi, L., Ferraro, F. R., & Lapenna, E. 2013, , 766, 78

2013
[122]

C., Vasiliev , E., Iorio , G., Evans , N

Myeong , G. C., Vasiliev , E., Iorio , G., Evans , N. W., & Belokurov , V. 2019, , 488, 1235

2019
[123]

P., Conroy , C., Bonaca , A., et al

Naidu , R. P., Conroy , C., Bonaca , A., et al. 2020, , 901, 48

2020
[124]

Nissen, P. E. 2004, in Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, ed. A. McWilliam & M. Rauch, Vol. 4, 156

2004
[125]

G., Aerts, C., P \'a pics, P

Pedersen, M. G., Aerts, C., P \'a pics, P. I., et al. 2021, Nat Astronomy, 5, 715

2021
[126]

M., Frebel, A., Beers, T

Placco, V. M., Frebel, A., Beers, T. C., & Stancliffe, R. J. 2014, , 797, 21

2014
[127]

M., Sneden, C., Roederer, I

Placco, V. M., Sneden, C., Roederer, I. U., et al. 2021, RNAAS, 5, 92

2021
[128]

2020, , 491, 1832

Prantzos, N., Abia, C., Cristallo, S., Limongi, M., & Chieffi, A. 2020, , 491, 1832

2020
[129]

P., Hartman, H., Nilsson, H., & J \"o nsson, P

Rhodin, A. P., Hartman, H., Nilsson, H., & J \"o nsson, P. 2017, , 598, A102

2017
[130]

P., Hartman, H., Nilsson, H., & J \"o nsson, P

Rhodin, A. P., Hartman, H., Nilsson, H., & J \"o nsson, P. 2024, , 682, A184

2024
[131]

Roederer , I. U. & Gnedin , O. Y. 2019, , 883, 84

2019
[132]

Roederer, I. U. & Lawler, J. E. 2012, , 750, 76

2012
[133]

Roederer, I. U. & Lawler, J. E. 2021, , 912, 119

2021
[134]

E., et al

Ruffoni, M., Den Hartog, E., Lawler, J. E., et al. 2014, , 441, 3127

2014
[135]

2010, , 403, 1829

Sch \"o nrich , R., Binney , J., & Dehnen , W. 2010, , 403, 1829

2010
[136]

J., et al

Simmerer, J., Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., et al. 2004, , 617, 1091

2004
[137]

M., Gargiulo , I., G \'o mez , F

Simpson , C. M., Gargiulo , I., G \'o mez , F. A., et al. 2019, , 490, L32

2019
[138]

J., Lawler, J

Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., Lawler, J. E., et al. 2003, , 591, 936

2003
[139]

S., Ivans, I

Sobeck, J. S., Ivans, I. I., Simmerer, J. A., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2949

2006
[140]

S., Lawler, J

Sobeck, J. S., Lawler, J. E., & Sneden, C. 2007, , 667, 1267

2007
[141]

2005, , 430, 655

Spite, M., Cayrel, R., Plez, B., et al. 2005, , 430, 655

2005
[142]

1986, in Instrumentation in astronomy VI, Vol

Tody, D. 1986, in Instrumentation in astronomy VI, Vol. 627, SPIE, 733--748

1986
[143]

1993, in ADASS II, Vol

Tody, D. 1993, in ADASS II, Vol. 52, 173

1993
[144]

2009, , 47, 371

Tolstoy , E., Hill , V., & Tosi , M. 2009, , 47, 371

2009
[145]

E., et al

Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nat Methods, 17, 261

2020
[146]

F., Li , T

Wan , Z., Lewis , G. F., Li , T. S., et al. 2020, Nat, 583, 768

2020
[147]

J., Selsing , J., et al

Watson , D., Hansen , C. J., Selsing , J., et al. 2019, Nat, 574, 497

2019
[148]

2012, , 750, L22

Winteler, C., K \"a ppeli, R., Perego, A., et al. 2012, , 750, L22

2012
[149]

E., Sneden, C., & Cowan, J

Wood, M., Lawler, J. E., Sneden, C., & Cowan, J. J. 2013, , 208, 27

2013
[150]

P., Lawler , J

Wood , M. P., Lawler , J. E., Den Hartog , E. A., Sneden , C., & Cowan , J. J. 2014, , 214, 18

2014
[151]

P., Sneden , C., Lawler , J

Wood , M. P., Sneden , C., Lawler , J. E., et al. 2018, , 234, 25

2018
[152]

C., & Huang , Y

Yuan , Z., Chang , J., Beers , T. C., & Huang , Y. 2020, , 898, L37

2020
[153]

2023, , 946, 110

Zhang, M., Xiang, M., Zhang, H.-W., et al. 2023, , 946, 110

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

[2] [2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

[3] [3]

@esa (Ref

\@ifclassloaded agu2001 natbib The agu2001 class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later remove the command natbib from the document \@ifclassloaded aguplus natbib The aguplus class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later rem...

[4] [4]

@stdbsttrue NAT@ctr \@lbibitem[ NAT@ctr ] \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 [ @natanchorstart #2\@extra@b@citeb \@biblabel @num @natanchorend] @ifcmd#1(@)(@)\@nil #2 @lbibitem\@undefined @lbibitem\@lbibitem \@lbibitem[#1]#2 @lb...

[5] [5]

@open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifundefined NAT@sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifundefined bib@heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel NAT@ctr \@bibsetup #1 NAT@ctr 0 @openbib .11em \@plus.33em \@minus.07em 4000 4000 `\.=1000 \@...

[6] [6]

P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T

Abbott , B. P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T. D., et al. 2017, , 119, 161101

2017

[7] [7]

S., Belokurov , V., Myeong , G

Aguado , D. S., Belokurov , V., Myeong , G. C., et al. 2021, , 908, L8

2021

[8] [8]

2023, PhD thesis

Alencastro Puls, A. 2023, PhD thesis

2023