Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Generic regularity for minimizing hypersurfaces in dimension 11

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that tiny perturbations of boundaries or metrics make area-minimizing hypersurfaces smooth in ambient dimension 11, and shrink singular sets in all higher dimensions.

desk verdict Strong extension of the CMS generic-regularity program that closes the R^11 borderline via a second-order Jacobi-field dichotomy; the main proof seems solid, with the residual risk concentrated in an external Jacobi-field classification cited to Simon–Solomon. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12852 v1 pith:ZI5MPLAK submitted 2025-06-15 math.DG math.AP

Otis Chodosh , Christos Mantoulidis , Felix Schulze , Zhihan Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.AP MSC 49Q2049Q1553A1058E12
keywords genericregularityPlateauproblemarea-minimizinghypersurfacessingularsetJacobifieldsminimizinghyperconesAlmgrenfrequencydimension11
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

For Plateau's problem, the paper proves that a smooth closed oriented submanifold boundary $\Gamma \subset \mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ can be perturbed $C^\infty$-slightly to $\Gamma'$ so that every area-minimizing integral current with boundary $\Gamma'$ is a smooth embedded hypersurface when $n+1 \leq 11$, and has singular set of dimension at most $n-10-\epsilon_n$ when $n+1 \geq 12$. The same conclusion holds for minimizers in a fixed integral homology class on a closed manifold, after a $C^\infty$-small perturbation of the Riemannian metric. This extends generic regularity from $\mathbb{R}^{10}$ to $\mathbb{R}^{11}$, and it improves the existing singular-set bound in all higher dimensions. The reason the last open dimension yields is a refined analysis of the borderline tangent cones $C^\circ \times \mathbb{R}^k$, with $C^\circ$ a quadratic hypercone in $\mathbb{R}^8$: one blow-up level deeper, the minimizer is modeled by Jacobi fields whose decay is either strictly faster than linear or exactly linear, and each case improves one of the two competing estimates. A sympathetic reader would take the paper's central claim to be that area-minimizing hypersurfaces are generically smooth up through ambient dimension $11$ in both the boundary and homology formulations.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the analysis of Jacobi fields on cylindrical hypercones $C = C^\circ \times \mathbb{R}^k$ whose factor $C^\circ$ is regular, strictly stable, strictly minimizing, and strongly integrable; all minimizing quadratic hypercones satisfy these properties. The load-bearing object is the decay order $G_C(u;\varrho)$, a discrete Almgren-type frequency with a monotonicity property, applied to the Jacobi field $u$ obtained by Simon non-concentration estimates when a minimizer is well-approximated by $C$. The key gap in the homogeneity spectrum, either degree $1$ or degree $\geq 1+\Delta^{>1}_C$, drives the fast/slow decay dichotomy: fast decay improves the Hölder separation of leaves, slow decay uses Corollary 3.34 to find a proper effective spine subspace $V_u \subsetneq \mathrm{spine}\, C$ on which nearby singular points concentrate. A covering tree structure (Proposition 6.1) packages the coarse dimension and coarse Hölder data into the Hausdorff dimension bounds for $\mathcal{T}(\mathrm{sing}\,\mathcal{F})$ and for the level sets $\mathcal{T}^{-1}(t)$. The whole construction works uniformly for a foliation of pairwise-disjoint minimizers with a Lipschitz time function $\mathcal{T}$, which is what lets Theorem 1.4 feed the Plateau and homology theorems.

What would settle it

A direct falsifier would be a $C^\infty$-small perturbation problem in $\mathbb{R}^{11}$ for which every perturbed boundary still admits a minimizing current with a singular point; that would contradict Theorem 1.1. A more structural test is to compute the Jacobi-field spectrum of a candidate minimizing quadratic hypercone in $\mathbb{R}^8$: if $\mathrm{Jac}_0$ or $\mathrm{Jac}_1$ contains anything beyond translations or rotations, the strong-integrability premise behind the slow-decay dimension reduction is violated, and the borderline argument would not apply to that cone.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a dichotomy for the singular behavior that blocks generic regularity in ambient dimension $11$. Near a point modeled by a cylindrical hypercone $C = C^\circ \times \mathbb{R}^k$ with $C^\circ$ a quadratic hypercone, the paper classifies the decay of the Jacobi field $u$ that describes the minimizer as a graph over $C$: either the decay order is $> 1$ (fast decay), in which case the tangent cone is unique and the separation between disjoint leaves improves by $\Delta^{>1}_C$; or the decay order equals $1$ (slow decay), in which case strong integrability of $C^\circ$ produces a proper linear subspace $V_u$ of the spine along which $u$ is translation-invariant. This proper 'effective spine' drops the coarse dimension of the singular set by one, so the previously borderline ratio $\dim \mathrm{spine}\, C/(1+\alpha(C)) = 3/3 = 1$ for $C^\circ \times \mathbb{R}^3$ becomes an effective ratio below $1$. Feeding both improvements into a covering-tree argument yields Theorem 1.4, whose dimension formulas imply $d^{\mathrm{img}}_n < 1$ exactly when $n+1 \leq 11$; Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 then follow by arranging Plateau boundaries or Riemannian metrics into a foliation of minimizers with disjoint supports. The upshot is that generic perturbations of the boundary or metric make minimizing hypersurfaces smooth in ambient dimension $11$, and cut the singular-set dimension to $n-10-\epsilon_n$ in dimensions $n+1 \geq 12$.

Load-bearing premise

The slow-decay half of the proof assumes that every minimizing quadratic hypercone $C^\circ$ is strongly integrable: its only homogeneous Jacobi fields of degree $0$ and $1$ are translations and rotations; if some minimizing quadratic cone in $\mathbb{R}^8$ had an exotic degree-zero or degree-one Jacobi field, the effective-spine reduction from $k$ to $k-1$ in Section 7.7 and the $\mathbb{R}^{11}$ conclusion would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In $\mathbb{R}^{11}$, the set of boundaries whose every minimizing current is smooth is both dense and open, hence Baire generic; singular minimizers become avoidable by arbitrary small boundary perturbations up through ambient dimension $11$.
  • In every ambient dimension $n+1 \geq 12$, a generically chosen minimizer has singular set of Hausdorff dimension at most $n-10-\epsilon_n$, improving the earlier $n-9-\epsilon'_n$ bound by one full dimension.
  • In the closed-manifold homology setting, generic metrics force minimizers in any nonzero integral homology class to be smooth embedded hypersurfaces for $n+1 \leq 11$, with the same improved singular bound above; this extends Schoen–Yau's positive scalar curvature obstruction up to dimension $11$ and, via Lohkamp's reduction, carries the positive mass theorem to those dimensions.
  • Theorem 1.4's formulas make the threshold exact: $d^{\mathrm{img}}_n < 1$ and $d^{\mathrm{dom}}_n < 0$ are equivalent to $n+1 \leq 11$, so the improvement comes precisely from the second-order Jacobi-field analysis rather than from a slack in the dimension count.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension recommended by the paper's own Remark 1.8: before attempting generic regularity in $\mathbb{R}^{12}$, one should determine whether $\mathbb{R}^8$ contains minimizing hypercones that are not strictly stable, strictly minimizing, or strongly integrable; any such cone would enlarge the borderline family beyond the quadratic cylinders this argument controls.
  • The fast/slow decay dichotomy suggests a general recipe for other borderline regularity problems: when the standard spine-dimension over Hölder-exponent ratio equals $1$, one extra blow-up level at the Jacobi-field scale can split the obstruction into a separation-improving case and a spine-dimension-reducing case, a transfer one might attempt in obstacle-type or mean-convex flow settings.
  • In the slow-decay case the effective spine is determined by the zero set of a homogeneous polynomial $p_3(r,y)$ (e.g., $y_1^3 - r^2 y_1$ for $k=3$), so one expects the singular set to concentrate on a codimension-one subspace of the spine; this refined stratification is implicit in Section 1.5 and could be made explicit in concrete examples such as foliations over Simons cones.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies generic regularity of area-minimizing hypersurfaces. For a smooth closed oriented (n-1)-dimensional boundary Gamma in R^{n+1}, Theorem 1.1 asserts that arbitrary C^infinity-small perturbations Gamma' make all minimizing integral currents with boundary [[Gamma']] equal to [[Sigma']] for a smooth oriented hypersurface Sigma', with sing Sigma' empty when n+1 <= 11 and dim sing Sigma' <= n-10-epsilon_n otherwise. Theorem 1.2 is the analogous statement for area-minimization in integral homology classes under generic metric perturbations. The proofs are via a foliation-type argument: a collection F of pairwise disjoint minimizing boundaries carrying a Lipschitz time function T is analyzed through a covering tree (Section 6), and Theorem 1.4 bounds dim T(sing F) and the level sets dim(sing F cap T^{-1}(t)). The new technical content is a second-order blow-up analysis near cylindrical hypercones C = C^circ x R^k (Sections 3-4), organized around a discrete Almgren-type decay order: fast decay gives improved Holder exponents, slow decay gives a k -> k-1 improvement of the spine dimension under a strong-integrability assumption. Sections 8-9 reduce the Plateau and homology theorems to Theorem 1.4 by constructing generic families with the required properties.

Significance. If correct, the paper settles generic smoothness of minimizing hypersurfaces in ambient dimension 11 and improves the generic singular-set bound in all dimensions >= 12; this is a substantial step beyond the previous R^9/R^10 results. The manuscript is unusually careful: Sections 7-9 give detailed proofs of the covering-tree estimates, the spectral quantities alpha(C), Delta^{qd}, and Delta^{non-qd} are defined independently of the target conclusion, and the principal external inputs (Zhu's spectral gap, the Edelen-Szekelyhidi Liouville theorem, Simon's non-concentration estimates, and the quantitative gap theorem from Wan's GAFA paper) are cited explicitly rather than re-derived. The fast/slow decay dichotomy and the use of beta-harmonic polynomials for degree-one Jacobi fields are new and convincing. The main caveat is the verification burden for strong integrability, which is load-bearing for the R^11 borderline case.

major comments (1)
  1. [Appendix A.4, Proposition A.4, used through Corollary 3.34 and Theorem 4.13 in Section 7.7] The proof that every quadratic hypercone is strongly integrable is a one-line citation to [SS86, Proposition 2.7]. This property is what makes the subspace V_u in Corollary 3.34 proper, and the k -> k-1 dimension reduction in Section 7.7 is exactly what removes the R^11 borderline term; if any minimizing quadratic cone in R^8 failed strong integrability, or if unexpected degree-one Jacobi fields on C = C^circ x R^k arose from components not controlled by Jac0(C^circ) and Jac1(C^circ), Theorem 1.1 would not follow from the present argument. Please quote the precise statement of [SS86, Proposition 2.7], indicate how it rules out all homogeneous Jacobi fields of degrees 0 and 1 beyond translations and rotations, and state explicitly that it covers the non-Simons cones C_{p,q} with p+q >= 6. Relatedly, Remark 3.22 asserts an equivalence between strong integrability of C^circ and equalities involving Jac*_{0,0}(C), Jac*_{1,0}(C), Jac*_{0,1}(C), and Jacrot(C); the text before it records only inclusions (Lemma 3.21), so the missing argument should be supplied. This is a verification request rather than an assertion of error, but as written the most specialized load-bearing premise is left entirely to a citation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Lemma 4.12] The statement says the limiting Jacobi field u is 'L^2(C cap B_1)-orthogonal to Jacrot(C)^perp'; this should read 'orthogonal to Jacrot(C)'.
  2. [Appendix H, after equation (H.10)] The constant kappa_C used in Lemma H.5 is not defined before the displayed identity; please introduce it when the graph domain D_Phi is fixed.
  3. [Corollary 1.6(ii)] The displayed definition of epsilon_n is broken across a line inside the outer min; please ensure the brace matching is unambiguous so the reader can compare the two terms.
  4. [Proposition 7.6, Claim 7.8] The phrase 'graph_C h_j over a connected exhaustion of C cap B_{1/4}' could be clarified by specifying the domain of h_j and the choice of normal, since the sign and positivity of the limiting Jacobi field are important.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: the derivation is self-contained after externally cited spectral results, and the new Jacobi-field analysis does not reduce to its inputs.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. Theorem 1.4 reduces the dimension estimates to spectrally defined quantities: alpha(C) is the smaller root of x^2 - (n-2)x - mu(C) = 0 with mu(C) the infimum of the Jacobi second variation over the link; Delta^{non-qd} is an infimum gap over non-quadratic minimizing cones; Delta^{qd} is a minimum of the spectral gaps Delta^{>1}_C arising from discreteness of Gamma^*(C). None of these quantities is fitted to the target conclusion: Lemma 5.3 cites Zhu [Zhu18] for the sharp lower bound attained at quadratic cones, Lemma 5.4 cites the fourth author's published GAFA paper [Wan24] for the strict non-quadratic gap, and Appendix A.4 cites [SS86, Proposition 2.7] for strong integrability. Although the Wan24 citation is a self-citation, it is an externally published, parameter-free spectral statement about minimizing cones, not a restatement of generic regularity, so it supplies independent support under the review rules. The genuinely new load-bearing step, Corollary 3.34 and Theorem 4.13, is proved directly by compactness/contradiction and translation-invariance arguments; it does not assume the dimension-11 conclusion. The final calculation in Corollary 1.6 is pure arithmetic using alpha_7 = 2, the strict monotonicity 2 = alpha_7 > alpha_8 > ... > 1, and the positivity of the spectral gaps; no construction forces these inequalities. The reductions from Theorem 1.1 to Theorem 1.4 via foliations are imported from prior work [CMS23a, CMS24], but those are independently established geometric reductions and are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem to forbid alternatives. The skeptical concern about whether [SS86] really supplies the strong-integrability classification is a citation-verification risk, not an exhibited circular reduction; the paper explicitly identifies strong integrability as an assumption in Remark 1.7 and verifies it for quadratic cones by citation. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations or definitions, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on established theorems in geometric analysis (Allard regularity, Hardt-Simon, Simon non-concentration, spectral geometry of quadratic cones) plus the authors' and collaborators' prior works. No free parameters are fitted to data; all constants are explicit or depend only on spectral gaps.

assumptions (9)
  • standard math Allard's regularity and compactness theorems for integral varifolds, and Hardt-Simon boundary regularity.
    Used in Sections 8 and 9 to show openness and boundary regularity of minimizers; cited to [All72], [All75], [HS79].
  • standard math Quadratic hypercones Cp,q are minimizing iff p+q >= 6 and (p,q) != (1,5),(5,1), and they are isolated modulo rotations.
    Provides the model cones C°; Proposition A.1 and Corollary A.5, citing [BDGG69, Law72, Sim74].
  • standard math Each quadratic hypercone is strictly stable (Definition 3.9).
    Proposition A.2 from [CHS84, Theorem 4.5]; needed for the Caccioppoli inequality in Lemma 3.14.
  • standard math Each minimizing quadratic hypercone is strictly minimizing (Definition H.2).
    Proposition A.3, citing [Lin87] and [Law91]; required for the Hardt-Simon foliation used in Appendix H.
  • standard math Each quadratic hypercone is strongly integrable: Jac0(C°)=Jactrl(C°) and Jac1(C°)=Jacrot(C°) (Definition 3.12).
    Proposition A.4 from [SS86, Proposition 2.7]; this is the load-bearing premise for the slow-decay case in Theorem 4.13.
  • standard math Lemma 5.3 (Zhu): for every nonflat minimizing hypercone C in R^{n+1}, alpha(C) >= alpha_n with equality iff C is quadratic.
    Cited to [Zhu18]; supplies the spectral gap used throughout Section 7 to compute dimensions.
  • standard math Lemma 5.4 (Wang): Delta^{non-qd}_n > 0, giving a positive spectral gap between quadratic and non-quadratic minimizing hypercones.
    Cited to [Wan24, Appendix A]; used to estimate alpha(C; sigma) in Proposition 5.7.
  • standard math Simon's non-concentration estimate for g-minimizing boundaries in Riemannian manifolds (Theorem H.1).
    Proved in Appendix H using [Sim94] techniques; underpins Proposition 4.5 (construction of Jacobi fields).
  • standard math Edelen-Szekelyhidi Liouville theorem: positive Jacobi fields in Jac*_pos(C) are one-dimensional, spanned by r^{gamma1} psi1.
    Lemma 3.21 incorporates [ES24, Lemma 2.7]; used to classify positive Jacobi fields in the slow-decay analysis.
invented entities (2)
  • Almgren-type decay order N^1_C(Sigma;p,tau) and G^kappa_C(u;varrho)
    purpose: Measures the L^2 rate at which a minimizing hypersurface or Jacobi field approaches a cylindrical hypercone C; splits the analysis into fast and slow decay cases.
    Defined in Definitions 3.23 and 4.1. It is a proof construct with no falsifiable prediction outside the paper.
  • Effective spine V_u (proper linear subspace of spine C)
    purpose: In the slow-decay case, identifies the subset of the spine where the approximating Jacobi field still decays at least linearly; gives a one-dimensional reduction of the singular set in Theorem 4.13.
    Constructed in Proposition 3.31 and Corollary 3.34 using strong integrability of C°. It is an internal geometric object, not an empirical entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generic regularity for minimizing hypersurfaces in dimension 11." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZI5MPLAK

@misc{pith2026250612852,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generic regularity for minimizing hypersurfaces in dimension 11},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZI5MPLAK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12852}
}
abstract

We prove that area-minimizing hypersurfaces are generically smooth in ambient dimension $11$ in the context of the Plateau problem and of area minimization in integral homology. For higher ambient dimensions, $n+1 \geq 12$, we prove in the same two contexts that area-minimizing hypersurfaces have at most an $n-10-\epsilon_n$ dimensional singular set after an arbitrarily $C^\infty$-small perturbation of the Plateau boundary or the ambient Riemannian metric, respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Area-minimizing submanifolds are not generically smooth, except for geodesics, minimal surfaces, and minimal hypersurfaces

    math.DG 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    For d≥3 and c≥2, open sets of metrics force every mod-2 area-minimizer to have singular set of Hausdorff dimension at least d−3; the Veronese RP2 cone is mod-2 minimizing.

  2. Nonlocal minimal surfaces are generically unique, and smooth in one extra dimension

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Nonlocal minimal surfaces are unique for all but countably many parameters in any strictly increasing family of exterior data, and arbitrarily small perturbations yield smooth minimizers in one dimension beyond the cr...

  3. Riemannian Positive Mass Theorem in All Dimensions in the Presence of Low-Codimension Singularities

    math.DG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Proves Riemannian positive mass theorem for asymptotically flat L^∞ metrics with subcritical singular sets of Minkowski dimension less than n-3 + 2/n (rigidity for ≤ n-3 + 1/(n-1)), using density theorem, capacity est...

  4. A conformal reduction for the X-ADM mass

    math.DG 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Positivity of the X-ADM mass is equivalent to the standard positive mass theorem via conformal reduction, establishing the X-positive mass theorem and mass-charge inequality in all dimensions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    William K. Allard. On the first variation of a varifold. Ann. of Math. (2) , 95:417--491, 1972

    work page 1972

  2. [2]

    William K. Allard. On the first variation of a varifold: boundary behavior. Ann. of Math. (2) , 101:418--446, 1975

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    F. J. Almgren, Jr. Some interior regularity theorems for minimal surfaces and an extension of B ernstein's theorem. Ann. of Math. (2) , 84:277--292, 1966

    work page 1966

  4. [4]

    Almgren, Jr

    Frederick J. Almgren, Jr. Almgren's big regularity paper , volume 1 of World Scientific Monograph Series in Mathematics . World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 2000. Q -valued functions minimizing Dirichlet's integral and the regularity of area-minimizing rectifiable currents up to codimension 2, With a preface by Jean E.\ Taylor and Vlad...

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Bombieri, E

    E. Bombieri, E. De Giorgi, and E. Giusti. Minimal cones and the B ernstein problem. Invent. Math. , 7:243--268, 1969

    work page 1969

  6. [6]

    Mean curvature flow with generic initial data

    Otis Chodosh, Kyeongsu Choi, Christos Mantoulidis, and Felix Schulze. Mean curvature flow with generic initial data. Invent. Math. , 237(1):121--220, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Mean curvature flow with generic low-entropy initial data

    Otis Chodosh, Kyeongsu Choi, Christos Mantoulidis, and Felix Schulze. Mean curvature flow with generic low-entropy initial data. Duke Math. J. , 173(7):1269--1290, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    S. S. Chern, M. do Carmo, and S. Kobayashi. Minimal submanifolds of a sphere with second fundamental form of constant length. In Functional A nalysis and R elated F ields ( P roc. C onf. for M . S tone, U niv. C hicago, C hicago, I ll., 1968) , pages 59--75. Springer, New York-Berlin, 1970

    work page 1968

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    The singular set of minimal surfaces near polyhedral cones

    Maria Colombo, Nick Edelen, and Luca Spolaor. The singular set of minimal surfaces near polyhedral cones. J. Differential Geom. , 120(3):411--503, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Minimal surfaces with isolated singularities

    Luis Caffarelli, Robert Hardt, and Leon Simon. Minimal surfaces with isolated singularities. Manuscripta Math. , 48(1-3):1--18, 1984

    1984

  3. [11]

    Minimal surfaces and the A llen- C ahn equation on 3-manifolds: index, multiplicity, and curvature estimates

    Otis Chodosh and Christos Mantoulidis. Minimal surfaces and the A llen- C ahn equation on 3-manifolds: index, multiplicity, and curvature estimates. Ann. of Math. (2) , 191(1):213--328, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    Generic regularity for minimizing hypersurfaces in dimensions 9 and 10

    Otis Chodosh, Christos Mantoulidis, and Felix Schulze. Generic regularity for minimizing hypersurfaces in dimensions 9 and 10. Preprint , arXiv:2302.02253, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Mean curvature flow with generic low-entropy initial data ii

    Otis Chodosh, Christos Mantoulidis, and Felix Schulze. Mean curvature flow with generic low-entropy initial data ii. Preprint, to appear in Duke Math. J. , arXiv:2309.03856, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Improved generic regularity of codimension-1 minimizing integral currents

    Otis Chodosh, Christos Mantoulidis, and Felix Schulze. Improved generic regularity of codimension-1 minimizing integral currents. Ars Inven. Anal. , pages Paper No. 3, 16, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Una estensione del teorema di B ernstein

    Ennio De Giorgi. Una estensione del teorema di B ernstein. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (3) , 19:79--85, 1965

    1965

  8. [16]

    Regularity of area minimizing currents III : blow-up

    Camillo De Lellis and Emanuele Spadaro. Regularity of area minimizing currents III : blow-up. Ann. of Math. (2) , 183(2):577--617, 2016

    2016

  9. [17]

    Regularity of minimal surfaces near quadratic cones

    Nick Edelen and Luca Spolaor. Regularity of minimal surfaces near quadratic cones. Ann. of Math. (2) , 198(3):1013--1046, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    A L iouville-type theorem for cylindrical cones

    Nick Edelen and G\'abor Sz\'ekelyhidi. A L iouville-type theorem for cylindrical cones. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 77(8):3557--3580, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Geometric measure theory

    Herbert Federer. Geometric measure theory . Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 153. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, 1969

    1969

  12. [20]

    Wendell H. Fleming. On the oriented P lateau problem. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) , 11:69--90, 1962

    1962

  13. [21]

    Generic regularity of free boundaries for the obstacle problem

    Alessio Figalli, Xavier Ros-Oton, and Joaquim Serra. Generic regularity of free boundaries for the obstacle problem. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \' E tudes Sci. , 132:181--292, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    On the fine structure of the free boundary for the classical obstacle problem

    Alessio Figalli and Joaquim Serra. On the fine structure of the free boundary for the classical obstacle problem. Invent. Math. , 215(1):311--366, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Minimal surfaces and functions of bounded variation , volume 80 of Monographs in Mathematics

    Enrico Giusti. Minimal surfaces and functions of bounded variation , volume 80 of Monographs in Mathematics . Birkh\" a user Verlag, Basel, 1984

    1984

  16. [24]

    Boundary regularity and embedded solutions for the oriented P lateau problem

    Robert Hardt and Leon Simon. Boundary regularity and embedded solutions for the oriented P lateau problem. Ann. of Math. (2) , 110(3):439--486, 1979

    1979

  17. [25]

    Area minimizing hypersurfaces with isolated singularities

    Robert Hardt and Leon Simon. Area minimizing hypersurfaces with isolated singularities. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 362:102--129, 1985

    1985

  18. [26]

    Analysis of singularities of area minimizing currents: a uniform height bound, estimates away from branch points of rapid decay, and uniqueness of tangent cones

    Brian Krummel and Neshan Wickramasekera. Analysis of singularities of area minimizing currents: a uniform height bound, estimates away from branch points of rapid decay, and uniqueness of tangent cones. Preprint , arXiv:2304.10272, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Analysis of singularities of area minimizing currents: planar frequency, branch points of rapid decay, and weak locally uniform approximation

    Brian Krummel and Neshan Wickramasekera. Analysis of singularities of area minimizing currents: planar frequency, branch points of rapid decay, and weak locally uniform approximation. Preprint , arXiv:2304.10653, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Blaine Lawson, Jr

    H. Blaine Lawson, Jr. Local rigidity theorems for minimal hypersurfaces. Ann. of Math. (2) , 89:187--197, 1969

    1969

  21. [29]

    Blaine Lawson, Jr

    H. Blaine Lawson, Jr. The equivariant P lateau problem and interior regularity. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 173:231--249, 1972

    1972

  22. [30]

    Gary R. Lawlor. A sufficient criterion for a cone to be area-minimizing. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 91(446):vi+111, 1991

    1991

  23. [31]

    Minimality and stability of minimal hypersurfaces in R ^N

    Fang-Hua Lin. Minimality and stability of minimal hypersurfaces in R ^N . Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. , 36(2):209--214, 1987

    1987

  24. [32]

    The fine structure of the singular set of area-minimizing integral currents iii: Frequency 1 flat singular points and H ^ m-2 -a.e

    Camillo De Lellis, Paul Minter, and Anna Skorobogatova. The fine structure of the singular set of area-minimizing integral currents iii: Frequency 1 flat singular points and H ^ m-2 -a.e. uniqueness of tangent cones. Preprint , arXiv:2304.11553, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    The secret hyperbolic life of positive scalar curvature

    Joachim Lohkamp. The secret hyperbolic life of positive scalar curvature. In Perspectives in scalar curvature. V ol. 1 , pages 611--642. World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, [2023] 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    The fine structure of the singular set of area-minimizing integral currents ii: rectifiability of flat singular points with singularity degree larger than 1

    Camillo De Lellis and Anna Skorobogatova. The fine structure of the singular set of area-minimizing integral currents ii: rectifiability of flat singular points with singularity degree larger than 1 . Preprint , arXiv:2304.11555, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    The fine structure of the singular set of area-minimizing integral currents i: the singularity degree of flat singular points

    Camillo De Lellis and Anna Skorobogatova. The fine structure of the singular set of area-minimizing integral currents i: the singularity degree of flat singular points. Preprint, to appear in Ars Inven. Anal. , arXiv:2304.11552, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Sets of finite perimeter and geometric variational problems , volume 135 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

    Francesco Maggi. Sets of finite perimeter and geometric variational problems , volume 135 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012. An introduction to geometric measure theory

    2012

  29. [37]

    Minimal surfaces of codimension one , volume 91 of North-Holland Mathematics Studies

    Umberto Massari and Mario Miranda. Minimal surfaces of codimension one , volume 91 of North-Holland Mathematics Studies . North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1984. Notas de Matem\' a tica [Mathematical Notes], 95

    1984

  30. [38]

    A structure theory for stable codimension 1 integral varifolds with applications to area minimising hypersurfaces mod \,p

    Paul Minter and Neshan Wickramasekera. A structure theory for stable codimension 1 integral varifolds with applications to area minimising hypersurfaces mod \,p . J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 37(3):861--927, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    First stability eigenvalue characterization of C lifford hypersurfaces

    Oscar Perdomo. First stability eigenvalue characterization of C lifford hypersurfaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 130(11):3379--3384, 2002

    2002

  32. [40]

    Minimal varieties in riemannian manifolds

    James Simons. Minimal varieties in riemannian manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) , 88:62--105, 1968

    1968

  33. [41]

    On a class of minimal cones in R n

    Plinio Simoes. On a class of minimal cones in R n . Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , 80:488--489, 1974

    1974

  34. [42]

    Lectures on geometric measure theory , volume 3 of Proceedings of the Centre for Mathematical Analysis, Australian National University

    Leon Simon. Lectures on geometric measure theory , volume 3 of Proceedings of the Centre for Mathematical Analysis, Australian National University . Australian National University, Centre for Mathematical Analysis, Canberra, 1983

    1983

  35. [43]

    A strict maximum principle for area minimizing hypersurfaces

    Leon Simon. A strict maximum principle for area minimizing hypersurfaces. J. Differential Geom. , 26(2):327--335, 1987

    1987

  36. [44]

    Cylindrical tangent cones and the singular set of minimal submanifolds

    Leon Simon. Cylindrical tangent cones and the singular set of minimal submanifolds. J. Differential Geom. , 38(3):585--652, 1993

    1993

  37. [45]

    Uniqueness of some cylindrical tangent cones

    Leon Simon. Uniqueness of some cylindrical tangent cones. Communications in Analysis and Geometry , 2(1):1--33, 1994

    1994

  38. [46]

    A general asymptotic decay lemma for elliptic problems

    Leon Simon. A general asymptotic decay lemma for elliptic problems. In Handbook of geometric analysis. N o. 1 , volume 7 of Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM) , pages 381--411. Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2008

    2008

  39. [47]

    A liouville-type theorem for stable minimal hypersurfaces

    Leon Simon. A liouville-type theorem for stable minimal hypersurfaces. Ars Inven. Anal. , pages Paper No. 5, 35, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    Generic regularity of homologically area minimizing hypersurfaces in eight-dimensional manifolds

    Nathan Smale. Generic regularity of homologically area minimizing hypersurfaces in eight-dimensional manifolds. Comm. Anal. Geom. , 1(2):217--228, 1993

    1993

  41. [49]

    Minimal hypersurfaces asymptotic to quadratic cones in R ^ n+1

    Leon Simon and Bruce Solomon. Minimal hypersurfaces asymptotic to quadratic cones in R ^ n+1 . Invent. Math. , 86(3):535--551, 1986

    1986

  42. [50]

    Positive scalar curvature and minimal hypersurface singularities

    Richard Schoen and Shing-Tung Yau. Positive scalar curvature and minimal hypersurface singularities. In Surveys in differential geometry 2019. D ifferential geometry, C alabi- Y au theory, and general relativity. P art 2 , volume 24 of Surv. Differ. Geom. , pages 441--480. Int...

    2019

  43. [51]

    Uniqueness of certain cylindrical tangent cones

    G \' a bor Sz \' e kelyhidi. Uniqueness of certain cylindrical tangent cones. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.02065 , 2020

    2012 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Minimal hypersurfaces with cylindrical tangent cones

    G \' a bor Sz \' e kelyhidi. Minimal hypersurfaces with cylindrical tangent cones. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.14786 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Mean convex smoothing of mean convex cones

    Zhihan Wang. Mean convex smoothing of mean convex cones. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 34(1):263--301, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Regularity of area-minimizing hypersurfaces at boundaries with multiplicity

    Brian White. Regularity of area-minimizing hypersurfaces at boundaries with multiplicity. In Seminar on minimal submanifolds , volume 103 of Ann. of Math. Stud. , pages 293--301. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983

    1983

  47. [55]

    A general regularity theory for stable codimension 1 integral varifolds

    Neshan Wickramasekera. A general regularity theory for stable codimension 1 integral varifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) , 179(3):843--1007, 2014

    2014

  48. [56]

    New characterizations of the C lifford tori and the V eronese surface

    Chuan Xi Wu. New characterizations of the C lifford tori and the V eronese surface. Arch. Math. (Basel) , 61(3):277--284, 1993

    1993

  49. [57]

    Jonathan J. Zhu. First stability eigenvalue of singular minimal hypersurfaces in spheres. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 57(5):Paper No. 130, 13, 2018

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.