Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 140 references

Observations of X-ray quasi-periodic eruptions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read X-ray quasi-periodic eruptions are a distinct class of repeating nuclear flares, and the accumulated evidence ties them to tidal disruption events.

desk verdict A solid, honest review of the 13-source QPE sample with a few new host-galaxy measurements that are not yet fully quantified; the TDE connection is plausible but population statistics remain hostage to selection effects the paper itself identifies. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15359 v1 pith:ZJ426TS3 submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords X-rayquasi-periodiceruptionstidaldisruptioneventssupermassiveblackholesaccretiondisksvariabilitygalacticnucleirepeatingnucleartransientsextreme-mass-ratioinspirals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quasi-periodic eruptions (QPEs) are repeating bursts of soft X-ray radiation from the nuclei of galaxies, discovered only in X-rays and now known in 13 systems. This review argues that these bursts form a physically connected population: they share thermal spectra with a characteristic temperature–luminosity hysteresis, quasi-regular recurrence on hours-to-days timescales, and quiescent emission consistent with compact accretion disks only a few hundred to a few thousand gravitational radii across. The paper assembles demographic evidence — host galaxies concentrated in the green valley, with post-starburst stellar populations and a high incidence of extended emission-line regions — and argues it mirrors the hosts of tidal disruption events (TDEs). It also highlights timing phenomena, including super-periodic modulations of burst arrival times, and estimates that about 9% of optically selected TDEs host QPEs within five years. The authors are explicit that the small, heterogeneously selected sample makes population-level trends provisional, and that the apparent duration–recurrence scaling may be partly a selection artifact.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the working definition of a QPE plus the tools used to map it. The definition itself — recurring thermal X-ray bursts with a counterclockwise hysteresis loop in the temperature–luminosity plane, each eruption shorter than the interval between bursts — sets what counts as a QPE. Three quantitative instruments carry the analysis: (1) O−C (observed minus calculated) diagrams of burst arrival times, which expose super-periodic modulations of the recurrence clock; (2) multicolor disk blackbody fits to quiescent X-ray–UV SEDs, which infer compact disk radii of a few hundred to a few thousand gravitational radii; and (3) the duration–recurrence plane (t_dur ∝ t_rec^1.3), which the

What would settle it

A blind, high-cadence X-ray survey that corrects for detection probability and recovers a flat duration–recurrence distribution would falsify the claimed intrinsic t_dur ∝ t_rec^1.3 scaling; similarly, a statistically large late-time X-ray campaign of optically selected TDEs that finds no QPEs would falsify the ~9% connection rate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

QPEs are defined as recurring thermal X-ray bursts from galactic nuclei, shorter than their recurrence time and showing temperature–luminosity hysteresis. The review argues the 13 known sources form a distinct population: quiescent emission fits compact, thermally dominated disks of a few hundred to a few thousand gravitational radii, and hosts are post-starburst, green-valley galaxies with low-mass black holes. Its central interpretive claim is an empirical link to tidal disruption events: QPEs appear months–years after optical TDEs, ~9% of optically selected TDEs host QPEs within five years, and host demographics mirror TDE hosts. Timing evidence (super-periodic modulations of burst arriva

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the 13-source sample, despite its heterogeneous discovery channels, is not so severely distorted by selection that the apparent timing trends, green-valley overrepresentation, and inferred TDE connection are artifacts of how the sources were found; the paper itself concedes that the apparent scaling between duration and recurrence may arise in part or in full from observational selection effects and that TDE-triggered searches introduce con

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If QPEs are physically tied to TDEs, late-time X-ray monitoring of optically discovered TDEs should keep turning up new QPEs; current rates imply roughly one in ten TDEs produces QPEs within five years.
  • The inferred compact disk sizes (a few hundred to a few thousand gravitational radii) rule out typical AGN-like extended disks as the quiescent emitter, so any viable QPE model must include a long-lived, compact accretion disk.
  • The super-periodic modulations seen in O−C diagrams of four sources provide an observational test that discriminates between orbiting-companion and disk-instability models; the lack of strict even/odd anti-correlation already contradicts simple EMRI precession models.
  • The strong selection biases mean that future blind surveys, not TDE-triggered follow-up, are required to measure the intrinsic rate and the true duration–recurrence relation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the QPE–TDE connection holds, every QPE source is a short-lived post-disruption system; a testable consequence is that QPEs should preferentially appear in galaxies with elevated TDE rates, such as those with recent nuclear star-formation bursts and dense gas reservoirs.
  • The positive period derivative seen in one source, if confirmed over a longer baseline, would strain all models based on fixed orbital or disk clocks and may point to a secularly evolving disk — a prediction that continued timing could test.
  • QPEs could serve as electromagnetic counterparts to extreme-mass-ratio inspirals; if any are discovered with intermediate-mass black hole companions, their merger timescales might fall within the observing window of next-generation low-frequency detectors, enabling joint EM–GW detections.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This invited review chapter synthesizes the observational state of the art for the 13 known X-ray quasi-periodic eruptions (QPEs). It compiles eruption and quiescent properties, timing behavior, host-galaxy demographics, rate estimates, model constraints, and future observational prospects. The chapter also includes some new material: an updated host-galaxy census, newly reported velocity dispersions for two hosts, and a claim of a 69% extended-emission-line-region (EELR) incidence based partly on unpublished MUSE data. The central thesis is that QPEs constitute a distinct, physically connected population of repeating nuclear transients whose quiescent disks are compact and TDE-like, with strong empirical links to tidal disruption events, while explicitly acknowledging that selection effects shape the current sample.

Significance. If the synthesis is correct, QPEs provide a new window onto black-hole accretion, stellar dynamics in galactic nuclei, and possibly EMRI gravitational-wave counterparts. The chapter's main strengths are its comprehensive sample compilation, its unusually candid discussion of selection biases (Sec. 4.2), and the effort to place host-galaxy demographics on a common footing. The rate estimates (eROSITA blind-survey rate and TDE-targeted Bayesian fraction q ≈ 0.09) are clearly attributed to the original analyses. The new host-galaxy measurements, if properly documented, would make this the most complete census to date. However, the load-bearing population-level claims -- green-valley overrepresentation, EELR incidence, and the inferred TDE connection -- are only as secure as the sample-selection model, and the chapter does not quantitatively propagate the acknowledged selection effects into those demographics. The new EELR and velocity-dispersion results are presented without the quantitative detail expected of refereed measurements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.5.2 / Fig. 11 / Table 2] The central new result, f_EELR = 0.69 (+0.31/-0.23), rests on EELR detections in four sources described only as 'reported in this work' and illustrated by RGB images. No line fluxes, equivalent widths, surface-brightness limits, spatial-extent measurements, or MUSE reduction/analysis details are given. This is load-bearing because the EELR incidence is then used to argue for elevated TDE rates and merger-acquired gas reservoirs. For a refereed journal, either provide a table of quantitative measurements and the detection criteria, or explicitly mark these as preliminary and exclude them from the population fraction.
  2. [Sec. 4.2 and Sec. 5.2] The chapter concedes that the t_dur-t_rec scaling 'may arise in part or in full' from duty-cycle selection and that TDE-triggered searches introduce confirmation bias, but the same selection effects are not propagated into the host-galaxy demographics. The green-valley overrepresentation (Sec. 5.2), EELR incidence (Sec. 5.5.2), and the inferred TDE connection are all measured on the same heterogeneous sample. The note that TDE-selected QPE hosts fall outside the green valley is helpful but does not address selection within the eROSITA blind sub-sample or the archival sub-sample. Please add a sensitivity analysis -- e.g., recompute the green-valley fraction and EELR incidence excluding TDE-triggered discoveries or restricting to the eROSITA sample -- and state how the demographic conclusions change, or soften the conclusions accordingly.
  3. [Sec. 5.3 / Table 2] The new velocity-dispersion measurements for eRO-QPE5 (sigma = 60±6 km/s) and eRASSt J2344 (sigma = 106±10 km/s) are presented without spectra, fitting details, or an explicit description of the MUSE data used. Citing the methodology of [83] is insufficient for new measurements, particularly because the resulting M_BH values carry 0.55 dex systematic uncertainties and are used in the subsequent discussion of black-hole masses and TDE regimes. Provide the fitted line profiles, wavelength ranges, and signal-to-noise, or present these as preliminary values with a clear caveat.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.1] Text near 'With the exception of a delayed and temporally smeared UV brightening correlated with the eruptions has been reported' is grammatically broken; please rephrase.
  2. [Sec. 5.5.2 / Fig. 11] The source name is spelled inconsistently as 'eRASSt J2344' and 'eRASST J2344'; unify throughout.
  3. [Table 1] The table deliberately omits individual errors. This is defensible for a review, but adding at least representative uncertainties for one epoch per source, or a footnote describing typical errors, would help readers judge which trends are significant.
  4. [Sec. 3.1.3] The phrase 'it may be unusual in the EMRI scenario that no QPEs have yet exhibited a smooth negative period derivative' could be sharpened by stating the expected sign of Pdot under standard EMRI orbital decay.
  5. [Sec. 5.5.2] Item 3 contains the typo 'than the the energy budget'; also, 'overrepresentation of a factor ≳10' should state the comparison sample explicitly in the text, not only by citation.
  6. [Figure 1] The axis label '0 10.5 1.5' in the left column appears garbled; please check all panel axis labels.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the review synthesizes independent measurements and explicitly hedges selection-affected trends.

full rationale

This is a review and synthesis, not a derivation chain in which an output equals an input. The closest candidate for a constructed trend, the t_dur–t_rec scaling shown in Sec. 4.2.1, is explicitly flagged by the authors as possibly arising "in part or in full" from observational selection effects, so it is not presented as a secure prediction and later sections use it only with that caveat. The rate estimates in Sec. 4.1 are either eROSITA blind-survey counts [59] or a Bayesian estimate of q from [24] with stated priors; q = 0.09+0.09/-0.05 is an inferred parameter with credible intervals, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The QPE–TDE connection is supported by temporal coincidences, compact-disk SED modeling, and host-galaxy demographics measured by several independent groups. Where the authors cite their own prior work (e.g., [18,21,24,32,59]), those are published peer-reviewed observational/modeling results with independent data, not an unverified uniqueness theorem or a parameter fitted to the very claim being supported. Sec. 4.2 candidly concedes discovery, classification, and TDE-triggered confirmation biases, which further cuts against hidden circularity: the population-level trends are explicitly treated as selection-affected and uncertain rather than as derived certainties. No self-definitional reduction, ansatz-smuggled-via-citation, imported uniqueness claim, or renaming of a known result was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. QPEs, super-periodic timing modulations, and EELRs are observed phenomena. The central claims rest on the classification definition, the M-sigma calibration, the thin-disk SED interpretation, sample representativeness, and the interpretation of temporal coincidences as physical associations.

free parameters (2)
  • QPE lifetime normalization tau_life = 10 yr (assumed)
    Sec. 4.1.1 quotes the volumetric formation rate as R_vol/tau_life ~ 0.6e-7 (tau_life/10 yr)^-1; the paper states tau_life is poorly constrained, so this is a chosen scale, not a measurement.
  • Bayesian priors for TDE-QPE fraction q = Lifetime U(1,20) yr; recurrence U(0.1,5) d; delay U(0.1,5) yr; luminosity power-law slope -1.83
    Sec. 4.1.2 lists these prior distributions used to estimate q=0.09+0.09-0.05; they are assumptions about the population and could change with an expanded sample.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The working QPE definition in Sec. 3 is a valid classification boundary for selecting sources.
    The paper says 'there is not yet an exact definition of what constitutes a QPE source'; the working definition drives the sample and the paper itself notes classification bias in Sec. 4.2.2.
  • domain assumption The M-sigma relation of Greene et al. 2020 is applicable to low-mass QPE hosts.
    Sec. 5.3 and Table 2 use this relation to estimate black hole masses; the paper cautions that the relation is not well calibrated for sigma<100 km/s and has a 0.55 dex systematic.
  • domain assumption Shakura-Sunyaev thin-disk SED models with null-stress boundary conditions describe the quiescent QPE emission.
    Sec. 3.2.2 infers compact disks (outer radii a few 100 to a few 1000 R_g) using these models; this underpins the TDE-disk connection.
  • domain assumption The current 13-source sample is sufficiently representative for population-level statistics.
    Sec. 4.2 argues that duty-cycle selection, classification bias, and TDE-triggered follow-up distort the sample; the paper acknowledges the inferred scalings may be largely selection effects.
  • domain assumption Temporal coincidences between QPEs and TDEs in several sources imply a physical connection rather than chance.
    Sec. 7.1 says the temporal association provides direct evidence for interconnection; the paper also notes the TDE-targeted selection bias in Sec. 4.2.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observations of X-ray quasi-periodic eruptions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZJ426TS3

@misc{pith2026260715359,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observations of X-ray quasi-periodic eruptions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZJ426TS3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15359}
}
read the original abstract

Quasi-periodic eruptions (QPEs) are a novel class of repeating nuclear transients, discovered exclusively in the X-ray band to date. Since their initial discovery in 2019, the QPE sample has grown to 13 sources, exhibiting large amplitude, quasi-regular eruptive variability patterns that are distinct from previously known modes of massive black hole variability. In this chapter, we provide a comprehensive overview of their observational characteristics. We review the X-ray spectral and timing properties of QPE eruptions, their long-term evolution, as well as the underlying quiescent emission, which is well described by thermally dominated, compact accretion disks. We discuss population-level emerging trends and selection biases, and present an updated census of their host galaxy properties. We also highlight the growing body of evidence pointing to strong connections between QPEs and tidal disruption events. Finally, we briefly summarize the key observational constraints on proposed QPE model interpretations, before looking ahead to the observational challenges and opportunities that will shape future progress in understanding this emerging population of nuclear transients.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [83]

    Wevers, S

    T. Wevers, S. van Velzen, P.G. Jonker, N.C. Stone, T. Hung, F. Onori, S. Gezari, N. Blagorodnova, MNRAS471(2), 1694 (2017). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stx1703

  2. [1]

    Miniutti, R.D

    G. Miniutti, R.D. Saxton, M. Giustini, K.D. Alexander, R.P. Fender, I. Hey- wood, I. Monageng, M. Coriat, A.K. Tzioumis, A.M. Read, C. Knigge, P. Gandhi, M.L. Pretorius, B. Agis-Gonzalez, Nature573(7774), 381 (2019). DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1556-x

  3. [2]

    Saxton, A.M

    R.D. Saxton, A.M. Read, P. Esquej, M.J. Freyberg, B. Altieri, D. Bermejo, A&A480(2), 611 (2008). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361:20079193

  4. [3]

    Aschenbach, H

    B. Aschenbach, H. Br ¨auninger, U. Briel, W. Brinkmann, H. Fink, N. Hei- necke, H. Hippmann, G. Kettenring, G. Metzner, A. Ondrusch, E. Pfeffer- mann, P. Predehl, G. Reger, K.H. Stephan, J. Tr¨ umper, H.U. Zimmermann, Space Sci. Rev.30(1-4), 569 (1981). DOI 10.1007/BF01246075

  5. [4]

    Jansen, D

    F. Jansen, D. Lumb, B. Altieri, J. Clavel, M. Ehle, C. Erd, C. Gabriel, M. Guainazzi, P. Gondoin, R. Much, R. Munoz, M. Santos, N. Schartel, D. Tex- ier, G. Vacanti, A&A365, L1 (2001). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

  6. [5]

    Gehrels, G

    N. Gehrels, G. Chincarini, P. Giommi, K.O. Mason, J.A. Nousek, A.A. Wells, N.E. White, S.D. Barthelmy, D.N. Burrows, L.R. Cominsky, K.C. Hurley, F.E. Marshall, P. M´esz´aros, P.W.A. Roming, L. Angelini, L.M. Barbier, T. Belloni, S. Campana, P.A. Caraveo, M.M. Chester, O. Citterio, T.L. Cline, M.S. Crop- per, J.R. Cummings, A.J. Dean, E.D. Feigelson, E.E. ...

  7. [6]

    Sheng, T

    Z. Sheng, T. Wang, G. Ferland, X. Shu, C. Yang, N. Jiang, Y. Chen, ApJL920(1), L25 (2021). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2251

  8. [7]

    Miniutti, M

    G. Miniutti, M. Giustini, R. Arcodia, R.D. Saxton, A.M. Read, S. Bianchi, K.D. Alexander, A&A670, A93 (2023). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202244512

Show all 140 references
  1. [8]

    Miniutti, R.D

    G. Miniutti, R.D. Saxton, P.M. Rodr ´ıguez-Pascual, A.M. Read, P. Esquej, M. Colless, P. Dobbie, M. Spolaor, MNRAS433(2), 1764 (2013). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stt850

  2. [9]

    Giustini, G

    M. Giustini, G. Miniutti, R.D. Saxton, A&A636, L2 (2020). DOI 10.1051/ 0004-6361/202037610

  3. [10]

    Dewangan, K.P

    G.C. Dewangan, K.P. Singh, Y.D. Mayya, G.C. Anupama, MNRAS318(1), 309 (2000). DOI 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03755.x

  4. [11]

    L. Sun, X. Shu, T. Wang, ApJ768(2), 167 (2013). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/ 768/2/167

  5. [12]

    Shu, T.G

    X.W. Shu, T.G. Wang, N. Jiang, J.X. Wang, L.M. Sun, H.Y. Zhou, ApJ837(1), 3 (2017). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5eb3 Observations of X-ray Quasi-Periodic Eruptions 41

  6. [13]

    Giustini, G

    M. Giustini, G. Miniutti, R. Arcodia, A. Goodwin, K.D. Alexander, J. Chakraborty, J. Buchner, P. Kosec, R. Saxton, M. Bonetti, A. Fran- chini, T. Ryu, X. Shu, E. Kara, G. Ponti, E. Quintin, F. Vincentelli, N. Webb, J. Kajava, S.D. von Fellenberg, A&A692, A15 (2024). DOI 10.105...

  7. [14]

    Predehl, R

    P. Predehl, R. Andritschke, V. Arefiev, V. Babyshkin, O. Batanov, W. Becker, H. B ¨ohringer, A. Bogomolov, T. Boller, K. Borm, W. Bornemann, H. Br ¨auninger, M. Br¨ uggen, H. Brunner, M. Brusa, E. Bulbul, M. Bun- tov, V. Burwitz, W. Burkert, N. Clerc, E. Churazov, D. Coutinho,...

  8. [15]

    Arcodia, A

    R. Arcodia, A. Merloni, K. Nandra, J. Buchner, M. Salvato, D. Pasham, R. Remillard, J. Comparat, G. Lamer, G. Ponti, A. Malyali, J. Wolf, Z. Arzoumanian, D. Bogensberger, D.A.H. Buckley, K. Gendreau, M. Gro- madzki, E. Kara, M. Krumpe, C. Markwardt, M.E. Ramos-Ceja, A. Rau, M....

  9. [16]

    Arcodia, Z

    R. Arcodia, Z. Liu, A. Merloni, A. Malyali, A. Rau, J. Chakraborty, A. Good- win, D. Buckley, J. Brink, M. Gromadzki, Z. Arzoumanian, J. Buchner, E. Kara, K. Nandra, G. Ponti, M. Salvato, G. Anderson, P. Baldini, I. Grotova, M. Krumpe, C. Maitra, J.C.A. Miller-Jones, M.E. Ramo...

  10. [17]

    Arcodia, P

    R. Arcodia, P. Baldini, A. Merloni, A. Rau, K. Nandra, J. Chakraborty, A.J. Goodwin, M.J. Page, J. Buchner, M. Masterson, I. Monageng, Z. Ar- zoumanian, D. Buckley, E. Kara, G. Ponti, M.E. Ramos-Ceja, M. Sal- vato, K. Gendreau, I. Grotova, M. Krumpe, ApJ989(1), 13 (2025). DOI ...

  11. [18]

    Wevers, D.R

    T. Wevers, D.R. Pasham, P. Jalan, S. Rakshit, R. Arcodia, A&A659, L2 (2022). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202243143

  12. [20]

    Sukov´a, F

    P. Sukov´a, F. Tombesi, D.R. Pasham, M. Zajaˇcek, T. Wevers, T. Ryu, I. Linial, A. Franchini, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2411.04592 (2024). DOI 10.48550/arXiv. 2411.04592 42 Wevers, Chakraborty, Quintin, Zaja ˇcek and Giustini

  13. [21]

    Wevers, K.D

    T. Wevers, K.D. French, A.I. Zabludoff, T.C. Fischer, K. Rowlands, M. Guolo, B. Dalla Barba, R. Arcodia, M. Berton, F. Bian, I. Linial, G. Miniutti, D.R. Pasham, ApJL970(1), L23 (2024). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5f1b

  14. [22]

    Mondek, M

    M. Mondek, M. Zajaˇcek, H. Best, T. Jankoviˇc, V. Karas, P. Kurf¨ urst, A&A709, A147 (2026). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202558531

  15. [23]

    Nicholl, D.R

    M. Nicholl, D.R. Pasham, A. Mummery, M. Guolo, K. Gendreau, G.C. De- wangan, E.C. Ferrara, R. Remillard, C. Bonnerot, J. Chakraborty, A. Hajela, V.S. Dhillon, A.F. Gillan, J. Greenwood, M.E. Huber, A. Janiuk, G. Salvesen, S. van Velzen, A. Aamer, K.D. Alexander, C.R. Angus, Z....

  16. [24]

    Chakraborty, E

    J. Chakraborty, E. Kara, R. Arcodia, J. Buchner, M. Giustini, L. Hern ´andez- Garc´ıa, I. Linial, M. Masterson, G. Miniutti, A. Mummery, C. Pana- giotou, E. Quintin, P. S ´anchez-S´aez, ApJL983(2), L39 (2025). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/adc2f8

  17. [25]

    Hern ´andez-Garc´ıa, J

    L. Hern ´andez-Garc´ıa, J. Chakraborty, P. S ´anchez-S´aez, C. Ricci, J. Cuadra, B. McKernan, K.E.S. Ford, P. Ar ´evalo, A. Rau, R. Arcodia, E. Kara, Z. Liu, A. Merloni, G. Bruni, A. Goodwin, Z. Arzoumanian, R.J. As- sef, P. Baldini, A. Bayo, F.E. Bauer, S. Bernal, M. Brightma...

  18. [26]

    Baldini, A

    P. Baldini, A. Rau, A. Merloni, B. Trakhtenbrot, R. Arcodia, M. Giustini, G. Miniutti, S.J. Brennan, M. Freyberg, P. S´anchez-S´aez, I. Grotova, Z. Liu, T. Lian, K. Nandra, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2602.03932 (2026). DOI 10.48550/ arXiv.2602.03932

  19. [27]

    Chakraborty, E

    J. Chakraborty, E. Kara, M. Masterson, M. Giustini, G. Miniutti, R. Saxton, ApJL921(2), L40 (2021). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ac313b

  20. [28]

    Quintin, N.A

    E. Quintin, N.A. Webb, S. Guillot, G. Miniutti, E.S. Kammoun, M. Giustini, R. Arcodia, G. Soucail, N. Clerc, R. Amato, C.B. Markwardt, A&A675, A152 (2023). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202346440

  21. [29]

    Bykov, M.R

    S.D. Bykov, M.R. Gilfanov, R.A. Sunyaev, P.S. Medvedev, MNRAS540(1), 30 (2025). DOI 10.1093/mnras/staf686

  22. [30]

    H. Guo, Z. Yan, Y.P. Li, J. Chakraborty, P. S ´anchez-S´aez, L. Hern ´andez- Garc´ıa, W. Zhang, J. Sun, S.L. Li, H. Deng, W. Zuo, H. Tagawa, X. Pan, M. Zhang, P. Ar´evalo, P. Lira, C. Jin, M. Gu, ApJL1000(2), L57 (2026). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ae524b Observations of X-ray Quasi...

  23. [31]

    Arcodia, G

    R. Arcodia, G. Miniutti, G. Ponti, J. Buchner, M. Giustini, A. Merloni, K. Nan- dra, F. Vincentelli, E. Kara, M. Salvato, D. Pasham, A&A662, A49 (2022). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202243259

  24. [32]

    Hern ´andez-Garc´ıa, P

    L. Hern ´andez-Garc´ıa, P. S´anchez-S´aez, J. Chakraborty, J. Cuadra, G. Mini- utti, R. Arcodia, P. Ar ´evalo, M. Giustini, E. Kara, C. Ricci, D.R. Pasham, Z. Arzoumanian, K. Gendreau, P. Lira, A&A703, A263 (2025). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202555258

  25. [33]

    Miniutti, M

    G. Miniutti, M. Giustini, R. Arcodia, R.D. Saxton, J. Chakraborty, A.M. Read, E. Kara, A&A674, L1 (2023). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202346653

  26. [34]

    Chakraborty, R

    J. Chakraborty, R. Arcodia, E. Kara, G. Miniutti, M. Giustini, A.J. Tetarenko, L. Rhodes, A. Franchini, M. Bonetti, K.B. Burdge, A.J. Goodwin, T.J. Mac- carone, A. Merloni, G. Ponti, R.A. Remillard, R.D. Saxton, ApJ965(1), 12 (2024). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2941

  27. [35]

    Arcodia, I

    R. Arcodia, I. Linial, G. Miniutti, A. Franchini, M. Giustini, M. Bonetti, A. Sesana, R. Soria, J. Chakraborty, M. Dotti, E. Kara, A. Merloni, G. Ponti, F. Vincentelli, A&A690, A80 (2024). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202451218

  28. [36]

    Pasham, S

    D. Pasham, S. Kejriwal, E. Coughlin, V. Witzany, A.J.K. Chua, M. Zaja ˇcek, T. Wevers, Y. Ajay, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2411.00289 (2024). DOI 10.48550/ arXiv.2411.00289

  29. [37]

    J. Xian, F. Zhang, L. Dou, J. He, X. Shu, ApJL921(2), L32 (2021). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ac31aa

  30. [38]

    C. Zhou, B. Zhong, Y. Zeng, L. Huang, Z. Pan, Phys. Rev. D110(8), 083019 (2024). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083019

  31. [40]

    Miniutti, A

    G. Miniutti, A. Franchini, M. Bonetti, M. Giustini, J. Chakraborty, R. Arcodia, R. Saxton, E. Quintin, P. Kosec, I. Linial, A. Sesana, A&A693, A179 (2025). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202452400

  32. [43]

    Kosec, E

    P. Kosec, E. Kara, L. Brenneman, J. Chakraborty, M. Giustini, G. Miniutti, C. Pinto, D. Rogantini, R. Arcodia, M. Middleton, A. Sacchi, ApJ978(1), 10 (2025). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9249

  33. [44]

    E. Kara, L. Dai, C.S. Reynolds, T. Kallman, MNRAS474(3), 3593 (2018). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stx3004 44 Wevers, Chakraborty, Quintin, Zaja ˇcek and Giustini

  34. [45]

    Wevers, M

    T. Wevers, M. Guolo, D.R. Pasham, E.R. Coughlin, F. Tombesi, Y. Yao, S. Gezari, ApJ963(1), 75 (2024). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1878

  35. [46]

    Ajay, D.R

    Y. Ajay, D.R. Pasham, T. Wevers, E.R. Coughlin, F. Tombesi, M. Guolo, J.F. Steiner, ApJL981(1), L14 (2025). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/adae03

  36. [47]

    Chakraborty, P

    J. Chakraborty, P. Kosec, E. Kara, G. Miniutti, R. Arcodia, E. Behar, M. Gius- tini, L. Hern ´andez-Garc´ıa, M. Masterson, E. Quintin, C. Ricci, P. S ´anchez- S´aez, ApJ984(2), 124 (2025). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/adb972

  37. [48]

    Goodwin, R

    A.J. Goodwin, R. Arcodia, G. Miniutti, J.C.A. Miller-Jones, S. van Velzen, PASA42, e130 (2025). DOI 10.1017/pasa.2025.10083

  38. [49]

    Wevers, M

    T. Wevers, M. Guolo, S. Lockwood, A. Mummery, D.R. Pasham, R. Arcodia, ApJL980(1), L1 (2025). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/adace9

  39. [50]

    E. Kara, J. Garc ´ıa, ARA&A63(1), 379 (2025). DOI 10.1146/ annurev-astro-071221-052844

  40. [51]

    Guolo, A

    M. Guolo, A. Mummery, T. Wevers, M. Nicholl, S. Gezari, A. Ingram, D.R. Pasham, ApJ985(2), 146 (2025). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/adcbac

  41. [53]

    Rees, Nature333(6173), 523 (1988)

    M.J. Rees, Nature333(6173), 523 (1988). DOI 10.1038/333523a0

  42. [54]

    Guolo, A

    M. Guolo, A. Mummery, S. van Velzen, S. Gezari, M. Nicholl, Y. Yao, M. Karmen, Y. Ajay, T. Wevers, N. LeBaron, R. Chornock, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2510.26774 (2025). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2510.26774

  43. [55]

    Guolo, A

    M. Guolo, A. Mummery, A. Ingram, M. Nicholl, S. Gezari, E. Nathan, ApJ992(1), 114 (2025). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ae039e

  44. [56]

    Gezari, ARA&A59, 21 (2021)

    S. Gezari, ARA&A59, 21 (2021). DOI 10.1146/ annurev-astro-111720-030029

  45. [57]

    Mummery, S.A

    A. Mummery, S.A. Balbus, MNRAS492(4), 5655 (2020). DOI 10.1093/ mnras/staa192

  46. [58]

    Mummery, E

    A. Mummery, E. Nathan, A. Ingram, M. Gardner, MNRAS544(2), 2225 (2025). DOI 10.1093/mnras/staf1565

  47. [59]

    Arcodia, A

    R. Arcodia, A. Merloni, J. Buchner, P. Baldini, G. Ponti, A. Rau, Z. Liu, K. Nandra, M. Salvato, A&A684, L14 (2024). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/ 202348949

  48. [60]

    French, T

    K.D. French, T. Wevers, J. Law-Smith, O. Graur, A.I. Zabludoff, Space Sci. Rev.216(3), 32 (2020). DOI 10.1007/s11214-020-00657-y

  49. [61]

    Y. Yao, V. Ravi, S. Gezari, S. van Velzen, W. Lu, S. Schulze, J.J. Somalwar, S.R. Kulkarni, E. Hammerstein, M. Nicholl, M.J. Graham, D.A. Perley, S.B. Cenko, R. Stein, A. Ricarte, U. Chadayammuri, E. Quataert, E.C. Bellm, J.S. Bloom, R. Dekany, A.J. Drake, S.L. Groom, A.A. Mah...

  50. [62]

    Grotova, A

    I. Grotova, A. Rau, P. Baldini, A.J. Goodwin, Z. Liu, A. Merloni, M. Salvato, G.E. Anderson, R. Arcodia, J. Buchner, M. Krumpe, A. Malyali, M. Mas- terson, J.C.A. Miller-Jones, K. Nandra, R. Shirley, A&A697, A159 (2025). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202553669 Observations of X-ray Qu...

  51. [63]

    Cao, P.G

    Z. Cao, P.G. Jonker, S. Wen, N.C. Stone, A.I. Zabludoff, A&A700, A48 (2025). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202453423

  52. [64]

    van Velzen, S

    S. van Velzen, S. Gezari, E. Hammerstein, N. Roth, S. Frederick, C. Ward, T. Hung, S.B. Cenko, R. Stein, D.A. Perley, K. Taggart, R.J. Foley, J. Soller- man, N. Blagorodnova, I. Andreoni, E.C. Bellm, V. Brinnel, K. De, R. Dekany, M. Feeney, C. Fremling, M. Giomi, V.Z. Golkhou,...

  53. [65]

    Veres, A

    P.M. Veres, A. Franckowiak, S. van Velzen, B. Adebahr, S. Taziaux, J. Necker, R. Stein, A. Kier, A. M¨ uller, D.J. Bomans, N. Jordana-Mitjans, M. Kowalski, E. Hammerstein, E. Marci-Boehncke, S. Reusch, S. Garrappa, S. Rose, K.K. Das, A&A706, A324 (2026). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/...

  54. [66]

    Evans, C.J

    P.A. Evans, C.J. Nixon, S. Campana, P. Charalampopoulos, D.A. Perley, A.A. Breeveld, K.L. Page, S.R. Oates, R.A.J. Eyles-Ferris, D.B. Malesani, L. Izzo, M.R. Goad, P.T. O’Brien, J.P. Osborne, B. Sbarufatti, Nature Astronomy7, 1368 (2023). DOI 10.1038/s41550-023-02073-y

  55. [67]

    Guolo, D.R

    M. Guolo, D.R. Pasham, M. Zaja ˇcek, E.R. Coughlin, S. Gezari, P. Sukov ´a, T. Wevers, V. Witzany, F. Tombesi, S. van Velzen, K.D. Alexander, Y. Yao, R. Arcodia, V. Karas, J.C.A. Miller-Jones, R. Remillard, K. Gendreau, E.C. Ferrara, Nature Astronomy8, 347 (2024). DOI 10.1038/...

  56. [68]

    Payne, B.J

    A.V. Payne, B.J. Shappee, J.T. Hinkle, P.J. Vallely, C.S. Kochanek, T.W.S. Holoien, K. Auchettl, K.Z. Stanek, T.A. Thompson, J.M.M. Neustadt, M.A. Tucker, J.D. Armstrong, J. Brimacombe, P. Cacella, R. Cornect, L. Den- neau, M.M. Fausnaugh, H. Flewelling, D. Grupe, A.N. Heinze,...

  57. [69]

    Quintin, N

    E. Quintin, N. Khan, N.A. Webb, R. Webbe, R.D. Saxton, G. Miniutti, M. Giustini, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2511.22520 (2025). DOI 10.48550/arXiv. 2511.22520

  58. [70]

    Newsome, I

    M. Newsome, I. Arcavi, K.D. French, C. McCully, A. Zabludoff, N. Stone, S. van Velzen, T. Wang, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2510.18985 (2025). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2510.18985

  59. [71]

    Gilbert, J.J

    O. Gilbert, J.J. Ruan, M. Eracleous, D. Haggard, J.C. Runnoe, ApJ994(2), 209 (2025). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1745

  60. [72]

    Law-Smith, E

    J. Law-Smith, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, S.L. Ellison, R.J. Foley, ApJ850(1), 22 (2017). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aa94c7

  61. [73]

    Graur, K.D

    O. Graur, K.D. French, H.J. Zahid, J. Guillochon, K.S. Mandel, K. Auchettl, A.I. Zabludoff, ApJ853(1), 39 (2018). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3fd

  62. [74]

    Gilbert, J.J

    O. Gilbert, J.J. Ruan, M. Eracleous, D. Haggard, J.C. Runnoe, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2409.10486 (2024). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2409.10486

  63. [75]

    Hammerstein, S

    E. Hammerstein, S. Gezari, S. van Velzen, S.B. Cenko, N. Roth, C. Ward, S. Frederick, T. Hung, M. Graham, R.J. Foley, E.C. Bellm, C. Cannella, A.J. 46 Wevers, Chakraborty, Quintin, Zaja ˇcek and Giustini Drake, T. Kupfer, R.R. Laher, A.A. Mahabal, F.J. Masci, R. Riddle, C. Roj...

  64. [76]

    Schawinski, C.M

    K. Schawinski, C.M. Urry, B.D. Simmons, L. Fortson, S. Kaviraj, W.C. Keel, C.J. Lintott, K.L. Masters, R.C. Nichol, M. Sarzi, R. Skibba, E. Treister, K.W. Willett, O.I. Wong, S.K. Yi, MNRAS440(1), 889 (2014). DOI 10.1093/ mnras/stu327

  65. [77]

    Gehrels, ApJ303, 336 (1986)

    N. Gehrels, ApJ303, 336 (1986). DOI 10.1086/164079

  66. [78]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. Yao, M. Gilfanov, S. Sazonov, P. Medvedev, G. Khorunzhev, R. Sunyaev, V. Ravi, S.R. Kulkarni, J. Somalwar, R. Chornock, I. Bikmaev, M.A. Gorbachev, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2512.12480 (2025). DOI 10.48550/ arXiv.2512.12480

  67. [79]

    Stern, R.J

    D. Stern, R.J. Assef, D.J. Benford, A. Blain, R. Cutri, A. Dey, P. Eisenhardt, R.L. Griffith, T.H. Jarrett, S. Lake, F. Masci, S. Petty, S.A. Stanford, C.W. Tsai, E.L. Wright, L. Yan, F. Harrison, K. Madsen, ApJ753(1), 30 (2012). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/30

  68. [80]

    Simard, J.T

    L. Simard, J.T. Mendel, D.R. Patton, S.L. Ellison, A.W. McConnachie, ApJS196(1), 11 (2011). DOI 10.1088/0067-0049/196/1/11

  69. [81]

    French, N

    K.D. French, N. Earl, A.B. Novack, B. Pardasani, V.R. Pillai, A. Tripathi, M.E. Verrico, ApJ950(2), 153 (2023). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/acd249

  70. [82]

    Greene, J

    J.E. Greene, J. Strader, L.C. Ho, ARA&A58, 257 (2020). DOI 10.1146/ annurev-astro-032620-021835

  71. [84]

    Patra, W

    K.C. Patra, W. Lu, Y. Ma, E. Quataert, G. Miniutti, M. Chiaberge, A.V. Filippenko, B.A. Gonz ´alez, MNRAS530(4), 5120 (2024). DOI 10.1093/ mnras/stae1146

  72. [85]

    Baldwin, M.M

    J.A. Baldwin, M.M. Phillips, R. Terlevich, PASP93, 5 (1981). DOI 10.1086/ 130766

  73. [86]

    Cid Fernandes, G

    R. Cid Fernandes, G. Stasi ´nska, A. Mateus, N. Vale Asari, MNRAS413(3), 1687 (2011). DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18244.x

  74. [87]

    Bundy, M.A

    K. Bundy, M.A. Bershady, D.R. Law, R. Yan, N. Drory, N. MacDonald, D.A. Wake, B. Cherinka, J.R. S´anchez-Gallego, A.M. Weijmans, D. Thomas, C. Tremonti, K. Masters, L. Coccato, A.M. Diamond-Stanic, A. Arag ´on- Salamanca, V. Avila-Reese, C. Badenes, J. Falc ´on-Barroso, F. Bel...

  75. [88]

    Xiong, N

    Y. Xiong, N. Jiang, Z. Pan, L. Hao, Z. Li, ApJ989(1), 49 (2025). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ade2d7

  76. [89]

    S ´anchez-S´aez, M

    P. S ´anchez-S´aez, M. Masterson, L. Hern´andez-Garc´ıa, R. Arcodia, P. Ar´evalo, F. ´Avila-Vera, F.E. Bauer, J. Chakraborty, J. Cuadra, P. Lira, T. Wevers, R.J. Assef, A. Bayo, S. Bernal, R. Cartier, Y. Diaz, M. Giustini, H. Guo, D. Ili ´c, E. Kara, A.B. Kova ˇcevi´c, M.L. Ma...

  77. [90]

    L ´opez-Cob´a, S.F

    C. L ´opez-Cob´a, S.F. S ´anchez, J.P. Anderson, I. Cruz-Gonz ´alez, L. Gal- bany, T. Ruiz-Lara, J.K. Barrera-Ballesteros, J.L. Prieto, H. Kuncarayakti, AJ159(4), 167 (2020). DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/ab7848

  78. [91]

    Mummery, M

    A. Mummery, M. Guolo, J. Matthews, M. Newsome, C. Lintott, W. Keel, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2503.14163 (2025). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14163

  79. [92]

    W.C. Keel, A. Moiseev, R. Uklein, A. Smirnova, MNRAS530(2), 1624 (2024). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stae946

  80. [96]

    Komossa, H

    S. Komossa, H. Zhou, T. Wang, M. Ajello, J. Ge, J. Greiner, H. Lu, M. Salvato, R. Saxton, H. Shan, D. Xu, W. Yuan, ApJL678(1), L13 (2008). DOI 10.1086/588281

  81. [97]

    Wang, H.Y

    T.G. Wang, H.Y. Zhou, S. Komossa, H.Y. Wang, W. Yuan, C. Yang, ApJ749(2), 115 (2012). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/115

  82. [98]

    Mummery, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2504.21456 (2025)

    A. Mummery, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2504.21456 (2025). DOI 10.48550/arXiv. 2504.21456

  83. [99]

    Pan, S.L

    X. Pan, S.L. Li, X. Cao, ApJ952(1), 32 (2023). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ acd180

  84. [100]

    Chakraborty, M

    J. Chakraborty, M. Masterson, A. Mummery, E. Kara, C. Panagiotou, R. Ar- codia, V. Berger, ApJ1000(1), 95 (2026). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4876

  85. [102]

    I. Vurm, I. Linial, B.D. Metzger, ApJ983(1), 40 (2025). DOI 10.3847/ 1538-4357/adb74d

  86. [103]

    Kasen, R.C

    D. Kasen, R.C. Thomas, P. Nugent, ApJ651(1), 366 (2006). DOI 10.1086/ 506190 48 Wevers, Chakraborty, Quintin, Zaja ˇcek and Giustini

  87. [104]

    Franchini, M

    A. Franchini, M. Bonetti, A. Lupi, G. Miniutti, E. Bortolas, M. Giustini, M. Dotti, A. Sesana, R. Arcodia, T. Ryu, A&A675, A100 (2023). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202346565

  88. [105]

    Huang, I

    X. Huang, I. Linial, Y.F. Jiang, ApJ993(2), 186 (2025). DOI 10.3847/ 1538-4357/ae07ca

  89. [106]

    Metzger, N.C

    B.D. Metzger, N.C. Stone, S. Gilbaum, ApJ926(1), 101 (2022). DOI 10. 3847/1538-4357/ac3ee1

  90. [107]

    Kaur, N.C

    K. Kaur, N.C. Stone, S. Gilbaum, MNRAS524(1), 1269 (2023). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stad1894

  91. [108]

    Pan, S.L

    X. Pan, S.L. Li, X. Cao, G. Miniutti, M. Gu, ApJL928(2), L18 (2022). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5faf

  92. [109]

    Raj, C.J

    A. Raj, C.J. Nixon, ApJ909(1), 82 (2021). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/abdc25

  93. [110]

    Middleton, A

    M. Middleton, A. G´ urpide, T.M. Kwan, L. Dai, R. Arcodia, J. Chakraborty, T. Dauser, P.C. Fragile, A. Ingram, G. Miniutti, C. Pinto, P. Kosec, MN- RAS537(2), 1688 (2025). DOI 10.1093/mnras/staf052

  94. [111]

    Belloni, M

    T. Belloni, M. Klein-Wolt, M. M ´endez, M. van der Klis, J. van Paradijs, A&A355, 271 (2000). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0001103

  95. [112]

    Altamirano, T

    D. Altamirano, T. Belloni, M. Linares, M. van der Klis, R. Wijnands, P.A. Cur- ran, M. Kalamkar, H. Stiele, S. Motta, T. Mu˜noz-Darias, P. Casella, H. Krimm, ApJL742(2), L17 (2011). DOI 10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L17

  96. [113]

    Pan, S.L

    X. Pan, S.L. Li, X. Cao, B. Liu, W. Yuan, ApJ989(2), 196 (2025). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/adf05d

  97. [114]

    Masterson, E

    M. Masterson, E. Kara, C. Panagiotou, W.N. Alston, J. Chakraborty, K. Burdge, C. Ricci, S. Laha, I. Arcavi, R. Arcodia, S.B. Cenko, A.C. Fabian, J.A. Garc ´ıa, M. Giustini, A. Ingram, P. Kosec, M. Loewenstein, E.T. Meyer, G. Miniutti, C. Pinto, R.A. Remillard, D.R. Sadaula, O....

  98. [115]

    J. Zhu, N. Jiang, Y. Wang, T. Wang, L. Sun, S. Zhong, Y. Yao, R. Chornock, L. Dai, J. Lyu, X. Shu, C. Fremling, E. Hammerstein, S. Huang, W. Li, B. You, ApJL994(1), L16 (2025). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ae19ea

  99. [116]

    Motta, Astronomische Nachrichten337(4-5), 398 (2016)

    S.E. Motta, Astronomische Nachrichten337(4-5), 398 (2016). DOI 10.1002/ asna.201612320

  100. [117]

    Ingram, S.E

    A.R. Ingram, S.E. Motta, New Astron. Rev.85, 101524 (2019). DOI 10.1016/ j.newar.2020.101524

  101. [118]

    van der Klis, ARA&A38, 717 (2000)

    M. van der Klis, ARA&A38, 717 (2000). DOI 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1. 717

  102. [119]

    Alston, A

    W. Alston, A. Fabian, J. Markevi ˇciut˙e, M. Parker, M. Middleton, E. Kara, Astronomische Nachrichten337(4-5), 417 (2016). DOI 10.1002/asna. 201612323

  103. [120]

    Lin, J.A

    D. Lin, J.A. Irwin, O. Godet, N.A. Webb, D. Barret, ApJL776(1), L10 (2013). DOI 10.1088/2041-8205/776/1/L10

  104. [122]

    Song, X.W

    J.R. Song, X.W. Shu, L.M. Sun, Y.Q. Xue, C. Jin, W.J. Zhang, N. Jiang, L.M. Dou, T.G. Wang, A&A644, L9 (2020). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202039410

  105. [123]

    Janiuk, B

    A. Janiuk, B. Czerny, A. Siemiginowska, ApJL542(1), L33 (2000). DOI 10.1086/312911

  106. [124]

    Janiuk, B

    A. Janiuk, B. Czerny, A. Siemiginowska, ApJ576(2), 908 (2002). DOI 10.1086/341804

  107. [125]

    Merloni, S

    A. Merloni, S. Nayakshin, MNRAS372(2), 728 (2006). DOI 10.1111/j. 1365-2966.2006.10889.x

  108. [126]

    Sukov ´a, M

    P. Sukov ´a, M. Zaja ˇcek, V. Witzany, V. Karas, ApJ917(1), 43 (2021). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ac05c6

  109. [127]

    King, MNRAS523(1), L26 (2023)

    A. King, MNRAS523(1), L26 (2023). DOI 10.1093/mnrasl/slad052

  110. [128]

    Tagawa, Z

    H. Tagawa, Z. Haiman, MNRAS526(1), 69 (2023). DOI 10.1093/mnras/ stad2616

  111. [129]

    P.Z. Yao, E. Quataert, Y.F. Jiang, W. Lu, C.J. White, ApJ978(1), 91 (2025). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8911

  112. [130]

    Linial, B.D

    I. Linial, B.D. Metzger, E. Quataert, ApJ991(2), 147 (2025). DOI 10.3847/ 1538-4357/adfa0e

  113. [131]

    Linial, B.D

    I. Linial, B.D. Metzger, ApJL963(1), L1 (2024). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ ad2464

  114. [132]

    Zhang, A

    S.N. Zhang, A. Santangelo, Y. Xu, H. Feng, F. Lu, Y. Chen, M. Ge, K. Nandra, X. Wu, M. Feroci, M. Hernanz, C. Liu, H. He, Y. Wang, W. Jiang, W. Cui, Y. Yang, J. Wang, W. Li, H. Li, Y. Du, X. Liu, B. Meng, X. Wen, A. Zhang, J. Ma, M. Li, G. Li, L. Qi, J. Sun, T. Luo, H. Liu, X....

  115. [133]

    Nandra, D

    K. Nandra, D. Barret, X. Barcons, A. Fabian, J.W. den Herder, L. Piro, M. Watson, C. Adami, J. Aird, J.M. Afonso, D. Alexander, C. Argiroffi, L. Amati, M. Arnaud, J.L. Atteia, M. Audard, C. Badenes, J. Ballet, L. Ballo, A. Bamba, A. Bhardwaj, E. Stefano Battistelli, W. Becker,...

  116. [134]

    Cruise, M

    M. Cruise, M. Guainazzi, J. Aird, F.J. Carrera, E. Costantini, L. Corrales, T. Dauser, D. Eckert, F. Gastaldello, H. Matsumoto, R. Osten, P.O. Petrucci, D. Porquet, G.W. Pratt, N. Rea, T.H. Reiprich, A. Simionescu, D. Spiga, E. Troja, Nature Astronomy9, 36 (2025). DOI 10.1038/...

  117. [135]

    Shvartzvald, E

    Y. Shvartzvald, E. Waxman, A. Gal-Yam, E.O. Ofek, S. Ben-Ami, D. Berge, M. Kowalski, R. B¨ uhler, S. Worm, J.E. Rhoads, I. Arcavi, D. Maoz, D. Pol- ishook, N. Stone, B. Trakhtenbrot, M. Ackermann, O. Aharonson, O. Birn- holtz, D. Chelouche, D. Guetta, N. Hallakoun, A. Horesh, ...

  118. [136]

    Werner, J

    N. Werner, J. ˇR´ıpa, C. Th ¨one, F. M¨ unz, P. Kurf¨ urst, M. Jel´ınek, F. Hroch, J. Ben ´aˇcek, M. Topinka, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, M. Zaja ˇcek, M. Labaj, M. Pri ˇsegen, J. Krti ˇcka, J. Merc, A. P ´al, O. Pejcha, V. D ´aniel, J. Jon, Observations of X-ray Quasi-Periodic Eru...

  119. [137]

    Zaja ˇcek, B

    M. Zaja ˇcek, B. Czerny, V.K. Jaiswal, M. ˇStolc, V. Karas, A. Pandey, D.R. Pasham, M. ´Sniegowska, V. Witzany, P. Sukov´a, F. M¨ unz, N. Werner, J.ˇR´ıpa, J. Merc, M. Labaj, P. Kurf¨ urst, J. Krtiˇcka, Space Sci. Rev.220(3), 29 (2024). DOI 10.1007/s11214-024-01062-5

  120. [138]

    Zaja ˇcek, N

    M. Zaja ˇcek, N. Werner, H. Best, J.E. L ’Heureux, J. ˇR´ıpa, M. Viskotov ´a, M. Mondek, F. M¨ unz, L. ˚A tofanov´a, P. Kurf¨ urst, M. Labaj, I.L. Garland, A. Tohuvavohu, V. Karas, P. Sukov ´a, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems11, 042222 (2025). DOI ...

  121. [139]

    Kulkarni, F.A

    S.R. Kulkarni, F.A. Harrison, B.W. Grefenstette, H.P. Earnshaw, I. Andreoni, D.A. Berg, J.S. Bloom, S.B. Cenko, R. Chornock, J.L. Christiansen, M.W. Coughlin, A. Wuollet Criswell, B. Darvish, K.K. Das, K. De, L. Dessart, D. Dixon, B. Dorsman, K. El-Badry, C. Evans, K.E.S. Ford...

  122. [140]

    N.M. Law, H. Corbett, N.W. Galliher, R. Gonzalez, A. Vasquez, G. Walters, L. Machia, J. Ratzloff, K. Ackley, C. Bizon, C. Clemens, S. Cox, S. Eikenberry, W.S. Howard, A. Glazier, A.W. Mann, R. Quimby, D. Reichart, D. Trilling, PASP134(1033), 035003 (2022). DOI 10.1088/1538-3873/ac4811

  123. [141]

    Pasham, E

    D.R. Pasham, E. Coughlin, S. van Velzen, J. Hinkle, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2502.12078 (2025). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2502.12078

  124. [142]

    Hallinan, V

    G. Hallinan, V. Ravi, S. Weinreb, J. Kocz, Y. Huang, D.P. Woody, J. Lamb, L. D’ Addario, M. Catha, C. Law, S.R. Kulkarni, E.S. Phinney, M.W. Eastwood, K. Bouman, M. McLaughlin, S. Ransom, X. Siemens, J. Cordes, R. Lynch, D. Kaplan, A. Brazier, S. Bhatnagar, S. Myers, F. Walter...

  125. [143]

    L. Lui, A. Torres-Orjuela, R.K. Chowdhury, L. Dai, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2508.07961 (2025). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2508.07961

  126. [144]

    Kejriwal, V

    S. Kejriwal, V. Witzany, M. Zaja ˇcek, D.R. Pasham, A.J.K. Chua, MN- RAS532(2), 2143 (2024). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stae1599

  127. [145]

    Suzuguchi, H

    T. Suzuguchi, H. Omiya, H. Takeda, PASJ (2025). DOI 10.1093/pasj/psaf132

  128. [146]

    Peters, Physical Review136(4B), 1224 (1964)

    P.C. Peters, Physical Review136(4B), 1224 (1964). DOI 10.1103/PhysRev. 136.B1224

  129. [147]

    Luo, L.S

    J. Luo, L.S. Chen, H.Z. Duan, Y.G. Gong, S. Hu, J. Ji, Q. Liu, J. Mei, V. Milyukov, M. Sazhin, C.G. Shao, V.T. Toth, H.B. Tu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, 52 Wevers, Chakraborty, Quintin, Zaja ˇcek and Giustini H.C. Yeh, M.S. Zhan, Y. Zhang, V. Zharov, Z.B. Zhou, Classical and Quantum Gr...

  130. [148]

    Jin, Y.Z

    S.J. Jin, Y.Z. Zhang, J.Y. Song, J.F. Zhang, X. Zhang, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy67(2), 220412 (2024). DOI 10.1007/ s11433-023-2276-1

  131. [149]

    Sesana, N

    A. Sesana, N. Korsakova, M. Arca Sedda, V. Baibhav, E. Barausse, S. Barke, E. Berti, M. Bonetti, P.R. Capelo, C. Caprini, J. Garcia-Bellido, Z. Haiman, K. Jani, O. Jennrich, P.H. Johansson, F.M. Khan, V. Korol, A. Lamberts, A. Lupi, A. Mangiagli, L. Mayer, G. Nardini, F. Pacuc...

  132. [150]

    Z.P. Ma, K. Wang, Phys. Rev. D112(6), 063031 (2025). DOI 10.1103/ 1qdt-917g

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.