REVIEW 2 cited by
JANET: Joint Adaptive predictioN-region Estimation for Time-series
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Conformal prediction provides machine learning models with prediction sets that offer theoretical guarantees, but the underlying assumption of exchangeability limits its applicability to time series data. Furthermore, existing approaches struggle to handle multi-step ahead prediction tasks, where uncertainty estimates across multiple future time points are crucial. We propose JANET (Joint Adaptive predictioN-region Estimation for Time-series), a novel framework for constructing conformal prediction regions that are valid for both univariate and multivariate time series. JANET generalises the inductive conformal framework and efficiently produces joint prediction regions with controlled K-familywise error rates, enabling flexible adaptation to specific application needs. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates JANET's superior performance in multi-step prediction tasks across diverse time series datasets, highlighting its potential for reliable and interpretable uncertainty quantification in sequential data.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Unified Comparative Study with Generalized Conformity Scores for Multi-Output Conformal Regression
New CDF-based and latent-space conformity scores give multi-output conformal predictors asymptotic conditional coverage while retaining finite-sample marginal coverage.
-
JAPAN: Joint Adaptive Prediction Areas with Normalising-Flows
JAPAN constructs conformal prediction sets by thresholding normalizing-flow density estimates, yielding valid, compact, possibly disjoint regions with lower area than residual-based baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.