Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

AutoRedTeamer: Autonomous Red Teaming with Lifelong Attack Integration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.15754 v1 pith:ZKBWLQ5P submitted 2025-03-20 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords attackautoredteamerteamingframeworkvectorswhileagentapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly capable, security and safety evaluation are crucial. While current red teaming approaches have made strides in assessing LLM vulnerabilities, they often rely heavily on human input and lack comprehensive coverage of emerging attack vectors. This paper introduces AutoRedTeamer, a novel framework for fully automated, end-to-end red teaming against LLMs. AutoRedTeamer combines a multi-agent architecture with a memory-guided attack selection mechanism to enable continuous discovery and integration of new attack vectors. The dual-agent framework consists of a red teaming agent that can operate from high-level risk categories alone to generate and execute test cases and a strategy proposer agent that autonomously discovers and implements new attacks by analyzing recent research. This modular design allows AutoRedTeamer to adapt to emerging threats while maintaining strong performance on existing attack vectors. We demonstrate AutoRedTeamer's effectiveness across diverse evaluation settings, achieving 20% higher attack success rates on HarmBench against Llama-3.1-70B while reducing computational costs by 46% compared to existing approaches. AutoRedTeamer also matches the diversity of human-curated benchmarks in generating test cases, providing a comprehensive, scalable, and continuously evolving framework for evaluating the security of AI systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Jailbreak-R1: Exploring the Jailbreak Capabilities of LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A three-stage RL framework (cold start, diversity warm-up, curriculum jailbreak) trains a 7B red-team model that reports SOTA jailbreak ASR and diversity on HarmBench, though the evaluation is compromised by training-...

  2. GeneBreaker: Jailbreak Attacks against DNA Language Models with Pathogenicity Guidance

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GeneBreaker, a new attack framework, steers DNA language models to generate sequences with over 90% identity to human pathogens, with success rates up to 60% on the largest Evo2 model.

  3. Security Concerns for Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies LLM security threats and argues that intrinsic agentic risks, such as scheming, are underappreciated and poorly defended.

  4. A Multimodal Automatic Redteaming Evaluation based on Atomic Jailbreak Strategy Decoupling and Combination

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new jailbreak framework, HACA, combines atomic text and image attack strategies selected by a cross-modal planner and generates attacks with LLMs and text-to-image models, reaching 95.48% average attack success acro...

Pith tools