Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

TableQA: a Large-Scale Chinese Text-to-SQL Dataset for Table-Aware SQL Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.06434 v1 pith:ZOVXHRFR submitted 2020-06-10 cs.DB cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.DBcs.AIcs.LG
keywords conditiontableaccuracylanguagetableqaapproachesdatasetdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Parsing natural language to corresponding SQL (NL2SQL) with data driven approaches like deep neural networks attracts much attention in recent years. Existing NL2SQL datasets assume that condition values should appear exactly in natural language questions and the queries are answerable given the table. However, these assumptions may fail in practical scenarios, because user may use different expressions for the same content in the table, and query information outside the table without the full picture of contents in table. Therefore we present TableQA, a large-scale cross-domain Natural Language to SQL dataset in Chinese language consisting 64,891 questions and 20,311 unique SQL queries on over 6,000 tables. Different from exisiting NL2SQL datasets, TableQA requires to generalize well not only to SQL skeletons of different questions and table schemas, but also to the various expressions for condition values. Experiment results show that the state-of-the-art model with 95.1% condition value accuracy on WikiSQL only gets 46.8% condition value accuracy and 43.0% logic form accuracy on TableQA, indicating the proposed dataset is challenging and necessary to handle. Two table-aware approaches are proposed to alleviate the problem, the end-to-end approaches obtains 51.3% and 47.4% accuracy on the condition value and logic form tasks, with improvement of 4.7% and 3.4% respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MMESGBench: Pioneering Multimodal Understanding and Complex Reasoning Benchmark for ESG Tasks

    cs.MM 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MMESGBench provides 933 validated multimodal QA pairs from 45 ESG documents and shows that multimodal and retrieval-augmented models outperform text-only baselines on ESG document reasoning.

Pith tools