REVIEW 4 cited by
TAPAS: a Toolbox for Adversarial Privacy Auditing of Synthetic Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Personal data collected at scale promises to improve decision-making and accelerate innovation. However, sharing and using such data raises serious privacy concerns. A promising solution is to produce synthetic data, artificial records to share instead of real data. Since synthetic records are not linked to real persons, this intuitively prevents classical re-identification attacks. However, this is insufficient to protect privacy. We here present TAPAS, a toolbox of attacks to evaluate synthetic data privacy under a wide range of scenarios. These attacks include generalizations of prior works and novel attacks. We also introduce a general framework for reasoning about privacy threats to synthetic data and showcase TAPAS on several examples.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Risk In Context: Benchmarking Privacy Leakage of Foundation Models in Synthetic Tabular Data Generation
LLM-based tabular generators reproduce seed rows often enough that membership-inference attacks succeed more against them than against GAN, VAE, or diffusion baselines.
-
Privacy-Preserving Tabular Synthetic Data Generation Using TabularARGN
TabularARGN is a discretization-based auto-regressive network claimed to generate high-fidelity, privacy-robust synthetic tabular data, competitive with diffusion and GAN baselines.
-
Synthetic Tabular Data: Methods, Attacks and Defenses
A review of tabular synthetic data generation, privacy attacks, and defenses, whose central message is that synthetic data alone does not guarantee privacy.
-
Synthetic Data Privacy Metrics
This preprint reviews existing privacy metrics for synthetic data and privacy-enhancing techniques, and argues that the field lacks standardization.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.