REVIEW 2 cited by
Modeling Uncertainty with Hedged Instance Embedding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Instance embeddings are an efficient and versatile image representation that facilitates applications like recognition, verification, retrieval, and clustering. Many metric learning methods represent the input as a single point in the embedding space. Often the distance between points is used as a proxy for match confidence. However, this can fail to represent uncertainty arising when the input is ambiguous, e.g., due to occlusion or blurriness. This work addresses this issue and explicitly models the uncertainty by hedging the location of each input in the embedding space. We introduce the hedged instance embedding (HIB) in which embeddings are modeled as random variables and the model is trained under the variational information bottleneck principle. Empirical results on our new N-digit MNIST dataset show that our method leads to the desired behavior of hedging its bets across the embedding space upon encountering ambiguous inputs. This results in improved performance for image matching and classification tasks, more structure in the learned embedding space, and an ability to compute a per-exemplar uncertainty measure that is correlated with downstream performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Learning Probabilistic Embeddings for Unsupervised Action Segmentation
Probabilistic Gaussian frame embeddings sampled before OT pseudo-labeling raise unsupervised action-segmentation MoF by up to 20.7% and F1 by 19% over deterministic baselines.
-
Confidence Optimization for Probabilistic Encoding
A confidence-aware loss plus a negative L2 variance term gives a small boost to probabilistic encoding classifiers on TweetEval, but gains over the SPC baseline are modest and inconsistent on RoBERTa.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.