Effects of Systematic Uncertainties on the Supernova Determination of Cosmological Parameters
read the original abstract
Mapping the recent expansion history of the universe offers the best hope for uncovering the characteristics of the dark energy believed to be responsible for the acceleration of the expansion. In determining cosmological and dark-energy parameters to the percent level, systematic uncertainties impose a floor on the accuracy more severe than the statistical measurement precision. We delineate the categorization, simulation, and understanding required to bound systematics for the specific case of the Type Ia supernova method. Using simulated data of forthcoming ground-based surveys and the proposed space-based SNAP mission we present Monte Carlo results for the residual uncertainties on the cosmological parameter determination. The tight systematics control with optical and near-infrared observations and the extended redshift reach allow a space survey to bound the systematics below 0.02 magnitudes at z=1.7. For a typical SNAP-like supernova survey, this keeps total errors within 15% of the statistical values and provides estimation of Omega_m to 0.03, w_0 to 0.07, and w' to 0.3; these can be further improved by incorporating complementary data.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Compressed Gaussian likelihood for the Planck low-$\ell$ data
A compressed Gaussian likelihood for Planck low-ℓ data is built from SRoll2 via offset log-normal functions for Fisher compatibility and validated against the original via MCMC.
-
What it takes to solve the Hubble tension through Modifications of Cosmological Recombination II: in light of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2
Perturbative modifications to the electron mass m_e(z) resolve the Hubble tension with Planck+ACT CMB data but cannot when DESI DR2 BAO data are added due to lowered Omega_m.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.