REVIEW 1 cited by
An evaluation of Naive Bayesian anti-spam filtering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
It has recently been argued that a Naive Bayesian classifier can be used to filter unsolicited bulk e-mail ("spam"). We conduct a thorough evaluation of this proposal on a corpus that we make publicly available, contributing towards standard benchmarks. At the same time we investigate the effect of attribute-set size, training-corpus size, lemmatization, and stop-lists on the filter's performance, issues that had not been previously explored. After introducing appropriate cost-sensitive evaluation measures, we reach the conclusion that additional safety nets are needed for the Naive Bayesian anti-spam filter to be viable in practice.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Improving Phishing Email Detection Performance of Small Large Language Models
Explanation-augmented LoRA fine-tuning lets small LLMs detect phishing emails with accuracy and F1 around 0.94 to 0.96 on the SpamAssassin test set, while transferring to unseen datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.