REVIEW 7 cited by
Evaluation of three methods for calculating statistical significance when incorporating a systematic uncertainty into a test of the background-only hypothesis for a Poisson process
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Hypothesis tests for the presence of new sources of Poisson counts amidst background processes are frequently performed in high energy physics (HEP), gamma ray astronomy (GRA), and other branches of science. While there are conceptual issues already when the mean rate of background is precisely known, the issues are even more difficult when the mean background rate has non-negligible uncertainty. After describing a variety of methods to be found in the HEP and GRA literature, we consider in detail three classes of algorithms and evaluate them over a wide range of parameter space, by the criterion of how close the ensemble-average Type I error rate (rejection of the background-only hypothesis when it is true) compares with the nominal significance level given by the algorithm. We recommend wider use of an algorithm firmly grounded in frequentist tests of the ratio of Poisson means, although for very low counts the over-coverage can be severe due to the effect of discreteness. We extend the studies of Cranmer, who found that a popular Bayesian-frequentist hybrid can undercover severely when taken to high Z values. We also examine the profile likelihood method, which has long been used in GRA and HEP; it provides an excellent approximation in much of the parameter space, as previously studied by Rolke and collaborators.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Gaussian Process Eigenmodes for Statistical and Systematic Uncertainties in Template Fits
Introduces Gaussian Process eigenmodes to unify statistical and systematic template uncertainties, replacing per-bin factors with truncated leading modes while containing Barlow-Beeston as a limiting case.
-
Discovery Sensitivity for a Counting Experiment with Background Uncertainty
Refined asymptotic formulas for median discovery significance in Poisson counting experiments with background uncertainty, validated with Monte Carlo and improved at low counts via r* corrections.
-
Search for long-lived charginos and $\tau$-sleptons using final states with a disappearing track in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector
No excess found in 137 fb^-1 of 13 TeV pp data; new 95% CL exclusions reach chargino masses up to 880 GeV and tau-sleptons up to 320 GeV at ~1 ns lifetimes.
-
Search for higgsinos in compressed mass spectra using low-momentum tracks in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector
No excess over the Standard Model is observed; ATLAS excludes chargino masses below 126 GeV at 95% CL for mass splittings of 0.3–2 GeV in a simplified higgsino model.
-
Potential for the discovery of the protophobic boson at the STCF
Detector-level simulations indicate the proposed STCF drift chamber could discover the 17 MeV protophobic X17 boson through displaced electron-positron vertices if Standard Model backgrounds stay below about 10^4 even...
-
Revisiting Universal Extra-Dimension Model with Gravity Mediated Decays
Existing LHC data exclude fat-brane mUED compactification scales below about 3 TeV, and ML-tagged searches at 500 fb^-1 could extend the reach to roughly 3.2 to 3.4 TeV.
-
Unveiling the Invisible: ALPs and Sterile Neutrinos at the LHC and HL-LHC
The mono-Higgs plus missing energy signature sets 95% CL bounds on the ALP-Higgs coupling CaH/Lambda^2 and the sterile neutrino-Higgs coupling lambda3/M*, but these bounds are weaker than existing limits from invisibl...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.