Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 49 cited by

Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-16 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Amplitude amplification finds a good element after a number of steps proportional to one over the square root of its initial probability.

desk verdict This paper generalizes Grover search to arbitrary unitaries and unknown success probabilities while adding amplitude estimation for optimal counting. read the letter →

arxiv quant-ph/0005055 v1 pith:YZXB4G6T submitted 2000-05-15 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords amplitudeamplificationGroveralgorithmquantumsearchestimationapproximatecountingquadraticspeedup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces amplitude amplification, a quantum process that finds an element x satisfying a Boolean condition chi after an expected number of applications of a given unitary algorithm A and its inverse that scales as 1 over the square root of a, where a is the probability that A produces a good x upon measurement. It generalizes Grover's algorithm, which was limited to uniform superpositions and a single promised solution, to arbitrary initial superpositions produced by any measurement-free A. The method works whether or not a is known in advance, and when a is known it succeeds in a fixed number of steps with high probability. The authors further combine the amplification idea with phase estimation to perform amplitude estimation, which estimates the value of a itself to high precision, and apply this to obtain optimal quantum algorithms for approximate counting of the number of good elements in X.

What carries the argument

The amplitude amplification operator constructed from A, its inverse, and reflections based on the condition chi, which rotates the state vector to increase the amplitude of good outcomes.

What would settle it

A direct simulation or experiment for small known values of a that shows the number of applications of A needed to produce a good x scales linearly with 1/a instead of 1/sqrt(a) would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Amplitude amplification is a process that allows to find a good x after an expected number of applications of A and its inverse which is proportional to 1/sqrt(a), assuming algorithm A makes no measurements. This is a generalization of Grover's searching algorithm in which A was restricted to producing an equal superposition of all members of X and we had a promise that a single x existed such that chi(x)=1. Our algorithm works whether or not the value of a is known ahead of time. In case the value of a is known, we can find a good x after a number of applications of A and its inverse which is proportional to 1/sqrt(a) even in the worst case. We show that this quadratic speedup can also be a

Load-bearing premise

The initial algorithm A is unitary and performs no measurements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any search problem whose good elements have probability a under a unitary preparation algorithm can be solved with quadratic speedup over classical repetition.
  • When the success probability a is known, a fixed number of applications suffices to find a solution with high probability.
  • The same quadratic speedup applies to search problems equipped with good classical heuristics that can be turned into a unitary algorithm A.
  • Amplitude estimation yields optimal quantum query complexity for approximate counting of the number of solutions to chi(x)=1.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique supplies a general primitive that can be substituted for classical repetition sampling in any quantum algorithm whose analysis depends on estimating or boosting success probabilities.
  • It opens the door to quantum versions of heuristic search methods in which the initial distribution produced by A is biased toward promising regions rather than uniform.
  • Because amplitude estimation recovers a with precision scaling as the square root of the number of queries, it can replace classical Monte Carlo estimation in hybrid quantum-classical pipelines.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces quantum amplitude amplification as a generalization of Grover's search algorithm. Given a unitary operator A producing a superposition with good-element probability a, it shows that a good x can be found after an expected O(1/sqrt(a)) applications of A and A^{-1} (whether or not a is known in advance). When a is known, a worst-case O(1/sqrt(a)) bound is obtained. The paper further combines the technique with quantum phase estimation to perform amplitude estimation of a and applies the result to optimal quantum approximate counting.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a parameter-free quadratic speedup for a broad family of search problems that admit classical heuristics and yields optimal quantum algorithms for counting. The derivations rest on standard unitary operator properties and phase estimation without fitted parameters or circularity, providing reusable building blocks for later quantum algorithms.

minor comments (2)
  1. The definition of the composite operator Q = -A S_0 A^{-1} S_chi and the geometric argument that it rotates by 2 theta (with sin^2 theta = a) would benefit from an explicit one-paragraph recap in the main text immediately after the abstract, to aid readers who skip the full derivation.
  2. In the amplitude-estimation section, the precision analysis for the phase-estimation subroutine (number of ancillary qubits and controlled applications of Q) is stated but could be cross-referenced to the exact equation numbers used for the rotation angle.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the positive assessment of the manuscript. We are gratified that the work is viewed as supplying reusable building blocks for quantum algorithms and that the recommendation is to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Derivation self-contained from unitary operator geometry

full rationale

The paper constructs the amplification operator Q explicitly from the given unitary A and the reflection operators S_0 and S_chi. The two-dimensional good/bad subspace rotation by 2 theta (with sin^2 theta = a) follows directly from the definition of these operators and the assumption that A is unitary with no intermediate measurements. No parameters are fitted to data, no self-citations carry the central claim, and the O(1/sqrt(a)) bound is obtained by counting applications of Q. The argument is internally consistent once the unitary assumption is granted and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters or entities; builds on existing quantum algorithms.

assumptions (1)
  • standard math Unitary evolution of quantum states
    Relies on standard quantum computing model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YZXB4G6T

@misc{pith2026quant-ph0005055,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YZXB4G6T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:quant-ph/0005055}
}
abstract

Consider a Boolean function $\chi: X \to \{0,1\}$ that partitions set $X$ between its good and bad elements, where $x$ is good if $\chi(x)=1$ and bad otherwise. Consider also a quantum algorithm $\mathcal A$ such that $A |0\rangle= \sum_{x\in X} \alpha_x |x\rangle$ is a quantum superposition of the elements of $X$, and let $a$ denote the probability that a good element is produced if $A |0\rangle$ is measured. If we repeat the process of running $A$, measuring the output, and using $\chi$ to check the validity of the result, we shall expect to repeat $1/a$ times on the average before a solution is found. *Amplitude amplification* is a process that allows to find a good $x$ after an expected number of applications of $A$ and its inverse which is proportional to $1/\sqrt{a}$, assuming algorithm $A$ makes no measurements. This is a generalization of Grover's searching algorithm in which $A$ was restricted to producing an equal superposition of all members of $X$ and we had a promise that a single $x$ existed such that $\chi(x)=1$. Our algorithm works whether or not the value of $a$ is known ahead of time. In case the value of $a$ is known, we can find a good $x$ after a number of applications of $A$ and its inverse which is proportional to $1/\sqrt{a}$ even in the worst case. We show that this quadratic speedup can also be obtained for a large family of search problems for which good classical heuristics exist. Finally, as our main result, we combine ideas from Grover's and Shor's quantum algorithms to perform amplitude estimation, a process that allows to estimate the value of $a$. We apply amplitude estimation to the problem of *approximate counting*, in which we wish to estimate the number of $x\in X$ such that $\chi(x)=1$. We obtain optimal quantum algorithms in a variety of settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 49 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improved Quantum Algorithms for Subset Sum and $k$-SUM

    cs.CC 2026-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A quantum walk over randomly sampled subset pairs yields a worst-case O~(n^{2k/7}) algorithm for k-SUM and an O^*(2^{2n/7}) algorithm for Subset Sum.

  2. Quantum Pattern Matching with Wildcards

    cs.DS 2025-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A quantum algorithm solves wildcard pattern matching in O~(sqrt(n) sqrt(k)) time when the total number of wildcards k is at least sqrt(n).

  3. Quantum Approximate Counting, Simplified

    quant-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Quantum approximate counting can match the optimal query complexity without the quantum Fourier transform, using only Grover iterations and classic coin-estimation analysis.

  4. Quantum algorithm for estimating volumes of convex bodies

    quant-ph 2019-08 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    A quantum algorithm estimates the volume of an n-dimensional convex body within error epsilon using O-tilde(n^3 + n^2.5/epsilon) membership queries, the first quantum speedup for this task.

  5. Faster Algorithms for Multimarginal Optimal Transport

    quant-ph 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    New algorithms approximate multimarginal optimal transport with near-linear classical time and sublinear quantum time in the tensor dimension, plus matching query lower bounds.

  6. A Paturi Theorem for Signed Subcube Representations

    cs.CC 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For symmetric Boolean functions, approximate signed-subcube weight is 2^Theta(D) and sparsity is 2^Theta(D) log n up to log factors, where D is the deepest transition depth.

  7. Faster quantum linear system solver beyond the condition number

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Two quantum linear system solvers are presented with query complexity independent of the condition number, scaling instead with an effective condition number or a solution-norm ratio.

  8. Faster Exponential-Time Approximate Counting via Bounded Self-Reductions

    cs.DS 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A reusable enumerate-or-sample framework turns recursion-tree upper bounds into O*(sqrt(b))-time approximate counters, improving bases for five counting problems.

  9. On estimating operator norm distance, with optimal trace distance estimation when one state is pure

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Rank-independent quantum estimators achieve Θ(1/ε) queries for operator-norm (and trace) distance when one state is pure, and Õ(1/ε^{3/2}) queries for general states, proving BQP-completeness.

  10. A Quantum Collocation Approach to One-Dimensional Boundary Value Problems with Coherent Amplitude Amplification

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Quantum collocation framework for 1D linear and nonlinear BVPs that uses a residual-threshold oracle on joint spatial-parameter registers to produce coherent superposition of spatially conditioned amplitude amplificat...

  11. Explicit Quantum Circuit Simulation of Nonlinear 1-Dimensional Fluid with Carleman-linearized Boltzmann Method

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Explicit quantum-circuit simulation of nonlinear 1D fluid via second-order Carleman-linearized Boltzmann equation and QSVD Taylor ODE solver, with logarithmic scaling analysis.

  12. Quantum Divide-and-Conquer for the Traveling Salesman Problem: Surpassing the $2^n$ Barrier

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Quantum divide-and-conquer with structured set-partition state preparation solves general TSP in O*(1.866^n) time, the first quantum algorithm claimed to beat the classical O*(2^n) barrier.

  13. Quantum Solvers for Nonlinear Matrix Equations in Quantum Chemistry

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Quantum algorithm block-encodes Riccati solutions for m-particle m-hole RPA using Riesz projectors and QSVT, claiming linear system-size scaling under sparsity and polynomial cost in excitation rank m.

  14. Measuring Less to Learn More: Quadratic Speedup in learning Nonlinear Properties of Quantum Density Matrices

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A quantum algorithm estimates Tr(ρ^k O) with O(√k) queries to a purification-preparing unitary, quadratically faster than sample-based methods, with a claimed matching lower bound.

  15. Matrix Inversion by Quantum Walk

    quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A quantum matrix-inversion algorithm that uses only Hamiltonian evolution of a weakly coupled embedding, removing phase estimation from HHL.

  16. Quantum simulation of scattering amplitudes and interferences in perturbative QCD

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A quantum circuit encodes QCD colour factors and diagram interferences in a measurement probability, with permuted identical-particle diagrams generated by swap sorting networks.

  17. Creation of Wave Packets for Quantum Chromodynamics on Quantum Computers

    quant-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A quantum algorithm based on Haag-Ruelle theory and LCU proposes to prepare hadron wave packets from the vacuum in 3D lattice QCD, with a success probability that shrinks polynomially with lattice spacing, energy, and...

  18. A shortcut to an optimal quantum linear system solver

    quant-ph 2024-06 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper gives a QLSS with query complexity (1+O(ε))κ ln(2√2/ε) using one kernel reflection when ||x|| is known, or O(κ log(1/ε)) overall, with explicit bound 56κ + 1.05κ ln(1/ε).

  19. Query and Depth Upper Bounds for Quantum Unitaries via Grover Search

    quant-ph 2021-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Any n-qubit unitary can be implemented approximately with Õ(2^{n/2}) oracle queries or exactly with Õ(2^{n/2}) circuit depth via Grover search reductions, with matching lower bounds for certain implementations.

  20. Span Programs and Quantum Space Complexity

    quant-ph 2019-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Unitary quantum space complexity is lower bounded by log approximate span program size, and an explicit function requires (log n)^(2-o(1)) space for monotone phase estimation algorithms.

  21. Optimal fidelity estimation when one state is pure via algorithmic Uhlmann transform

    quant-ph 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    When at least one of two quantum states is pure, the Uhlmann fidelity can be estimated with Θ(1/ε) queries and Θ(1/ε²) samples without knowing which state is pure, matching the optimal lower bounds.

  22. QuantumMind: Constraint-Grounded Agentic Reasoning for Speedup Analysis in Quantum Computing

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A structured AI agent with typed steps and deterministic checks beats prompting and agentic baselines for producing auditable quantum-speedup hypotheses, scoring 53.1 versus 35.8 mean ODS on 582 tasks.

  23. High-level quantum structured programs as quantum registers compositions

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A formal framework for structured quantum programming where operations act on entire quantum registers, demonstrated by a quantum SMT solver prototype.

  24. Closed Timelike Curve Decoding on Quantum Hardware

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Routing a Deutsch-CTC loop state to a dump register makes the induced map the replacement channel σ ↦ ρ_M with unique fixed point ρ_M; IBM single-qubit data characterize the post-selected decoder branch.

  25. Structure-Aware Variational State Preparation for Quantum Basket Option Pricing

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A basket-CDF-based variational loader cuts quantum state-preparation depth from exponential to linear for basket option pricing, at few-percent simulated pricing error.

  26. Two-Tower Quantum Matrix Chain Multiplication: Trading Qubits for Depth

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-layer quantum circuit encodes the product of K matrices into a state in depth O(polylog), independent of K, under QRAM state preparation.

  27. Quantum ring all-reduce: communication and privacy advantages for distributed learning

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quantum ring all-reduce halves per-link communication via superdense coding and enables composable ε-secure aggregation at 2x GHZ overhead, plus quantum advantages in gradient conflict detection.

  28. Quantum Algorithms for Modulated Circulant Matrix Vector Multiplication

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Defines the Modulated Quantum Fourier Transform (MQFT) as a quantum primitive for modulated circulant matrix-vector multiplication.

  29. Efficient and Expressive Boundary Conditions in Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Methods

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    New boundary condition approach for QLBM using one coherent operation on the full boundary, claimed to use fewer resources asymptotically and practically for bounce-back and specular reflection.

  30. Quantum algorithms for density functional theory with minimal readout

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Qubit-efficient quantum algorithm for KS-DFT computes occupied orbitals simultaneously and evaluates total energy via Harris functional without density readout, with a second multi-copy method for self-consistency.

  31. Introduction to Generalized Symmetries

    hep-th 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vector-norm Trotter error bounds cut the time-step count by exponential-in-n factors for quantum solvers of anisotropic convection and diffusion equations versus operator-norm analyses.

  32. Fourier extensions for matrix-function block encodings with error-independent subnormalization bounds

    quant-ph 2026-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fourier-extension-based LCU approximates non-unitary operators with exponential accuracy and subnormalization growing only double-logarithmically in inverse error.

  33. A Grover-compatible manifold optimization algorithm for quantum search

    quant-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Riemannian gradient-ascent method with oracle/diffusion-only 'Grover-compatible' retractions converges to the marked state in O(√N log(1/ε)) iterations, matching Grover's quadratic speedup.

  34. Heisenberg limited quantum algorithm for estimating the fidelity susceptibility

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A quantum algorithm estimates fidelity susceptibility in O~(1/epsilon) queries using a resolvent reformulation, achieving Heisenberg-limited precision.

  35. Quantum Algorithms for Bandits with Knapsacks with Improved Regret and Time Complexities

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quantum algorithms for bandits with knapsacks achieve improved regret and time complexity by replacing classical sampling with quantum Monte Carlo and approximate quantum LP solving.

  36. Benincasa-Dowker-Glaser causal set actions by quantum counting

    quant-ph 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Presents an asymptotically optimal Õ(n²)-time quantum algorithm for the BDG causal set action via uniform superposition over causal set encodings and two-stage quantum counting.

  37. Beyond Worst-Case Branching: Quantum Tree Search via Amplitude Amplification

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Amplitude amplification constructs dynamic search trees of depth m with query complexity √(b_avg^m), outperforming worst-case assumptions and quantum backtracking for problems lacking natural backtracking structure.

  38. Tuning Quantum MPS

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Two-stage CMA-ES optimization plus circuit-feature ranking model for MPS hyperparameter tuning, recovering part of the offline optimum gain on circuit families.

  39. Automatic De-Quantization of Quantum Programs Using Constant Propagation

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Hybrid quantum-classical constant propagation reduces multi-qubit quantum operations by propagating constants between quantum and classical program states.

  40. QuantFPFlow: Quantum Amplitude Estimation for Fokker--Planck Policy Optimisation in Continuous Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    QuantFPFlow uses quantum amplitude estimation in a Fokker-Planck RL framework to achieve O(1/ε) partition function estimation and reports improved global optimum discovery plus better scaling in continuous control tasks.

  41. Offline dedicated quantum attacks on block cipher constructions based on two parallel permutation-based pseudorandom functions

    quant-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    By separating XOR-type functions into secret and public halves, quantum key-recovery on TPP-PRF block cipher constructions becomes offline and reduces Q2 oracle queries from O(2^{(n+t)/2}(n-t)) to O(2^t(n-t)).

  42. Circuit-Efficient Randomized Quantum Simulation of Non-Unitary Dynamics with Observable-Driven and Symmetry-Aware Designs

    quant-ph 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A randomized compilation of LCHS for non-unitary dynamics, with an observable-driven variant and a symmetry-aware sampler, claims reduced ancilla and circuit depth at the cost of more repetitions.

  43. The Input Problem: A Permanent Bottleneck for Quantum Machine Learning

    quant-ph 2026-08 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    Preparing a generic classical data vector as a quantum state provably costs Θ(N) gates, so algorithms that claim O(polylog N) total time on classical data are dominated by their own input stage.

  44. Nested Grover's Algorithm for Tree Search

    quant-ph 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A nested Grover algorithm for tree search claims cost O(m*2^(m/4)) using partial candidate solutions, but the speedup relies on an unexamined assumption that the candidate set contains the solution.

  45. Efficient Maximum Clique Detection via Grover's Algorithm with Real-time Global Size Tracking

    quant-ph 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A proposed Grover-based maximum clique solver claims O(sqrt(2^n)) iterations and O(1) measurements by pre-encoding the clique size, but the pre-encoding itself costs exponentially many gates and is excluded from the h...

  46. A Quantum Path to Partial Differential Equations

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 3.5 of 10

    Lecture notes that organize quantum PDE algorithms around block encodings of finite-difference and finite-element operators, tracking discretization, preparation, normalization, postselection, and measurement costs.

  47. An Information-Theoretic Characterization of Optimal Value-Readout in Response-Register Quantum Oracles

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    For finite Abelian response groups, the optimal single-query value-readout probability equals the normalized Rényi-1/2 effective Fourier support of the response state.

  48. Quantum algorithms for the simulation of QCD processes in the perturbative regime

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Quantum circuits for the colour algebra of perturbative QCD are presented and validated on a simulator, matching analytic colour factors for example diagrams.

  49. A Rigorous and Self--Contained Proof of the Grover--Rudolph State Preparation Algorithm

    quant-ph 2026-01 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    The Grover–Rudolph correctness proof is formally redone, but the claimed error bound and bit/shots rule are only in the abstract, and the Gray-code ladder proof has a false step.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 49 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Quantum lower bounds by polynomials

    Beals, Robert, Harry Buhrman, Richard Cleve, Michele Mosca and Ronald de Wolf , “Quantum lower bounds by polynomials”, Proceed- ings of 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Sci ence, November 1998, pp. 352 – 361

  2. [2]

    Notes on the history of reversible computatio n

    Bennett, Charles H., “Notes on the history of reversible computatio n”, IBM Journal of Research and Development , 1988, Vol. 32, pp. 16 – 23

  3. [3]

    Tight bounds on quantum searching

    Boyer, Michel, Gilles Brassard, Peter Høyer and Alain Tapp, “Tight bounds on quantum searching”, Fortschritte Der Physik , special issue on quantum computing and quantum cryptography, 1998, Vol. 46, pp. 493 – 505

  4. [4]

    An exact quantum polynomial- time algorithm for Simon’s problem

    Brassard, Gilles and Peter Høyer, “An exact quantum polynomial- time algorithm for Simon’s problem”, Proceedings of Fifth Israeli Sym- posium on Theory of Computing and Systems , IEEE Computer Society Press, June 1997, pp. 12 – 23

  5. [5]

    Quantum count- ing

    Brassard, Gilles, Peter Høyer and Alain Tapp, “Quantum count- ing”, Proceedings of 25th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming , Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1443, Springer-Verlag, July 1998, pp. 820 – 831

  6. [6]

    Quantum database searching by a sin- gle query

    Chi, Dong–Pyo and Jinsoo Kim, “Quantum database searching by a sin- gle query”, Lecture at First NASA International Conference on Quan- tum Computing and Quantum Communications , Palm Springs, Febru- ary 1998. 31

  7. [7]

    Quantum algorithms revisited

    Cleve, Richard, Artur Ekert, Chiara Macchiavello and Michele Mosca, “Quantum algorithms revisited”, Proceedings of the Royal So- ciety, London , Vol. A354, 1998, pp. 339 – 354

  8. [8]

    A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search

    Grover, Lov K., “A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search”, Proceedings of 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, May 1996, pp. 212 – 219

Show all 15 references
  1. [9]

    Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle i n a haystack

    Grover, Lov K., “Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle i n a haystack”, Physical Review Letters , Vol. 79, July 1997, pp. 325 – 328

  2. [10]

    Quantum computers can search rapidly by using almost any transformation

    Grover, Lov K., “Quantum computers can search rapidly by using almost any transformation”, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 80, May 1998, pp. 4329 – 4332

  3. [11]

    Conjugated operators in quantum algorithms

    Høyer, Peter, “Conjugated operators in quantum algorithms”, Physical Review A, Vol. 59, May 1999, pp. 3280 – 3289

  4. [12]

    Quantum measurements and the Abelian stabilizer problem

    Kitaev, A. Yu., “Quantum measurements and the Abelian stabilizer problem”, November 1995. Available at Los Alamos e-Print ar chive as <http:/ /arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9511026>

  5. [13]

    Quantum searching and counting by eigenvector analysis

    Mosca, Michele, “Quantum searching and counting by eigenvector analysis”, Proceedings of Randomized Algorithms, Satellite Workshop of 23rd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Com- puter Science, Brno, Czech Republic, August 1998, pp. 90 – 10 0

  6. [14]

    The quantum query complexity of approximating the median and related statistics

    Nayak, Ashwin and Felix Wu, “The quantum query complexity of approximating the median and related statistics”, Proceedings of 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing , May 1999, pp. 384 – 393

  7. [15]

    Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factoriz ation and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer

    Shor, Peter W., “Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factoriz ation and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer”, SIAM Journal on Computing, Vol. 26, October 1997, pp. 1484 – 1509. 32

Pith tools

Reviewed May 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.