pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

Explain the Lean def `LinearFeasible` in module `IndisputableMonolith.Complexity.SAT.BWD3SchurPinch`. Write for an educated reader who knows science and programming but may not know Lean. Cover: (1) what the declaration says in plain English, (2) why it matters in Recognition Science, (3) how to read the formal statement, (4) visible dependencies or certificates in the supplied source, and (5) what this declaration does not prove. Cite only declarations present in the supplied Recognition source.

permalink: https://pith.science/recognition/ask/explain-the-lean-def-linearfeasible-in-module-indisputablemo-83733abe · first asked 2026-05-10 · browse all asks

Big AI job. Grok 4.3 reads the canon and writes a Lean-grounded derivation; usually 20 seconds to 2 minutes. The page will refresh to your answer when it’s ready.
confidence: low outside recognition cached

The supplied Lean source does not contain the module IndisputableMonolith.Complexity.SAT.BWD3SchurPinch or any declaration named LinearFeasible. The provided modules cover Alexander duality for D=3, Langlands structural bridges from recognition cost, reality-from-distinction forcing chains, single-anchor SI calibration, recognition band geometry, recognition bandwidth, recognition forcing from cost, and constructive computability notes. No SAT, complexity, or BWD3SchurPinch content appears. The question cannot be answered from the canon slice.

outside recognition

Aspects Recognition does not yet address:

  • Module IndisputableMonolith.Complexity.SAT.BWD3SchurPinch
  • Declaration LinearFeasible
  • Any SAT-related definitions or theorems in the Recognition Science canon

recognition modules consulted

The Recognition library is at github.com/jonwashburn/shape-of-logic. The model is restricted to the supplied Lean source and instructed not to invent theorem names. Treat output as a starting point, not a verified proof.