IndisputableMonolith.ClassicalBridge.Fluids.Galerkin2D
The module supplies the mathematical objects for a truncated Fourier representation of 2D incompressible flow. Researchers working on the Recognition Science classical bridge to fluids cite these definitions when assembling the Galerkin-to-continuum pipeline. All content is definitional; no theorems are stated or proved. The central object is the 2D Fourier mode as an integer wavevector pair.
claimA 2D Fourier mode is a pair of integers $(k_1, k_2) \in \mathbb{Z}^2$. A Galerkin state consists of complex velocity coefficients on a finite truncation of such modes, equipped with a discrete Laplacian, a convection operator, and a right-hand side for the projected Navier-Stokes system, together with a discrete energy functional.
background
This module sits in the ClassicalBridge domain and introduces the basic structures for 2D spectral methods applied to fluid equations. It defines the mode as a wavevector pair, the set of modes under truncation, velocity coefficients, the state space, the squared wavenumber, the discrete Laplacian, the convection operator, the right-hand side for the Galerkin Navier-Stokes system, a discrete energy, and a hypothesis on energy skew-symmetry. The setting is the finite-dimensional projection of the 2D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations onto a Fourier basis, prior to any embedding into LNAL or continuum limits.
proof idea
this is a definition module, no proofs
why it matters in Recognition Science
The definitions here are imported by the CPM2D module to instantiate the Law of Existence for the Galerkin model, by Simulation2D to define the one-step bridge, by LNALSemantics for encoding, by ContinuumLimit2D for the embedding to infinite coefficients, and by Regularity2D for the top-level composition to a continuum solution. It fills the M1 slot in the fluids pipeline milestones.
scope and limits
- Does not contain any proofs of existence or regularity for solutions.
- Does not implement time-stepping or numerical simulation.
- Does not address three-dimensional flows.
- Does not incorporate the Recognition Science forcing chain or phi-ladder.
- Does not prove the energy skew-symmetry; it only states it as a hypothesis.
used by (5)
declarations in this module (19)
-
abbrev
Mode2 -
def
modeTrunc -
def
modes -
lemma
mem_modes_iff -
abbrev
VelCoeff -
abbrev
GalerkinState -
def
kSq -
def
laplacianCoeff -
def
ConvectionOp -
def
galerkinNSRHS -
def
discreteEnergy -
structure
EnergySkewHypothesis -
theorem
inviscid_energy_deriv_zero -
lemma
laplacianCoeff_inner_self_nonpos -
theorem
viscous_energy_deriv_le_zero -
theorem
viscous_energy_deriv_nonpos -
theorem
viscous_energy_antitone -
theorem
viscous_energy_bound_from_initial -
theorem
viscous_norm_bound_from_initial