paper2_median_chi2

formal source

 107/-! ## Paper II Benchmark Values (Rotation-curves-Paper2-Sept-26.tex) -/
 108
 109/-- Paper II reports ILG median chi2/N = 2.75 on SPARC Q=1 subset. -/
 110def paper2_median_chi2 : ℝ := 2.75
 111
 112/-- Paper II reports ILG mean chi2/N = 4.23 on SPARC Q=1 subset. -/
 113def paper2_mean_chi2 : ℝ := 4.23
 114
 115/-- Paper II SPARC Q=1 sample size. -/
 116def paper2_N_galaxies : ℕ := 127
 117
 118/-- MOND simple-nu comparison: median 2.47, mean 4.65. -/
 119def mond_median_chi2 : ℝ := 2.47
 120def mond_mean_chi2 : ℝ := 4.65
 121
 122/-- ILG has higher median but LOWER mean than MOND — it handles
 123    outliers better due to the global-only constraint. -/
 124theorem ilg_better_mean_than_mond :
 125    paper2_mean_chi2 < mond_mean_chi2 := by
 126  unfold paper2_mean_chi2 mond_mean_chi2; norm_num
 127
 128/-! ## Global-Only Policy (Paper I + Paper II) -/
 129
 130/-- The global-only policy: the ILG weight function w(r) depends ONLY
 131    on catalog-level constants (alpha, C_lag, Upsilon, tau_star) and
 132    the photometric baryonic profile (v_gas, v_disk, v_bul).
 133
 134    It does NOT depend on:
 135    - The observed rotation velocity (kinematic data)
 136    - Any per-galaxy fitted parameter
 137    - The galaxy's morphological classification (beyond photometry)
 138
 139    This is formalized as: the parameters are functions of phi alone. -/
 140structure GlobalOnlyPolicy where