pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem

kernel_match_differential

proved
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Measurement.KernelMatch
domain
Measurement
line
105 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Measurement.KernelMatch on GitHub at line 105.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

formal source

 102    _ = 2 * Real.cot ϑ := hy_sub
 103
 104/-- Differential form of kernel match: J(r) dϑ = 2 tan ϑ dϑ -/
 105theorem kernel_match_differential (ϑ : ℝ) (hϑ : 0 ≤ ϑ ∧ ϑ ≤ π/2) :
 106  Jcost (recognitionProfile ϑ) = 2 * Real.cot ϑ :=
 107  kernel_match_pointwise ϑ hϑ
 108
 109/-- The integrand match: ∫ J(r(ϑ)) dϑ = 2 ∫ tan ϑ dϑ -/
 110theorem kernel_integral_match (θ_s : ℝ) (hθ : 0 < θ_s ∧ θ_s < π/2) :
 111  ∫ ϑ in (0)..(π/2 - θ_s), Jcost (recognitionProfile (ϑ + θ_s)) =
 112  2 * ∫ ϑ in (0)..(π/2 - θ_s), Real.cot (ϑ + θ_s) := by
 113  -- Follows by integrating the pointwise identity
 114  -- measurability and integrability are standard for these smooth functions
 115  have hb_nonneg : 0 ≤ π/2 - θ_s := sub_nonneg.mpr (le_of_lt hθ.2)
 116  have hpt : ∀ ϑ ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) (π/2 - θ_s),
 117      Jcost (recognitionProfile (ϑ + θ_s)) = 2 * Real.cot (ϑ + θ_s) := by
 118    intro ϑ hϑ
 119    apply kernel_match_pointwise (ϑ + θ_s)
 120    constructor
 121    · have hθ_nonneg : 0 ≤ θ_s := le_of_lt hθ.1
 122      exact add_nonneg hϑ.1 hθ_nonneg
 123    · have : ϑ ≤ π/2 - θ_s := hϑ.2
 124      have hsum := add_le_add_right this θ_s
 125      simpa [add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc] using hsum
 126  have h_ae :
 127      ∀ᵐ ϑ ∂MeasureTheory.volume,
 128        ϑ ∈ Set.uIoc 0 (π/2 - θ_s) →
 129          Jcost (recognitionProfile (ϑ + θ_s)) = 2 * Real.cot (ϑ + θ_s) := by
 130    refine Filter.Eventually.of_forall ?_
 131    intro ϑ hϑ
 132    have hIoc : ϑ ∈ Set.Ioc (0 : ℝ) (π/2 - θ_s) := by
 133      simpa [Set.uIoc, hb_nonneg] using hϑ
 134    have hIcc : ϑ ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) (π/2 - θ_s) := by
 135      exact ⟨le_of_lt hIoc.1, hIoc.2⟩