Recognition: unknown
A Tutorial on Spectral Clustering
read the original abstract
In recent years, spectral clustering has become one of the most popular modern clustering algorithms. It is simple to implement, can be solved efficiently by standard linear algebra software, and very often outperforms traditional clustering algorithms such as the k-means algorithm. On the first glance spectral clustering appears slightly mysterious, and it is not obvious to see why it works at all and what it really does. The goal of this tutorial is to give some intuition on those questions. We describe different graph Laplacians and their basic properties, present the most common spectral clustering algorithms, and derive those algorithms from scratch by several different approaches. Advantages and disadvantages of the different spectral clustering algorithms are discussed.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Rank Is Not Capacity: Spectral Occupancy for Latent Graph Models
Spectra defines and controls effective capacity in graph embeddings via the Shannon effective rank of a trace-normalized kernel spectrum, making capacity a post-fit property rather than a pre-training hyperparameter.
-
What Matters for Diffusion-Friendly Latent Manifold? Prior-Aligned Autoencoders for Latent Diffusion
Prior-Aligned AutoEncoders shape latent manifolds with spatial coherence, local continuity, and global semantics to improve latent diffusion, achieving SOTA gFID 1.03 on ImageNet 256x256 with up to 13x faster convergence.
-
Improved large-scale graph learning through ridge spectral sparsification
GSQUEAK produces spectrally accurate sparsifiers for graph Laplacians in a single-pass distributed streaming setting.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.