pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1304.4525 · v3 · submitted 2013-04-16 · 💱 q-fin.GN

Recognition: unknown

Overspend? Late? Failure? What the Data Say About IT Project Risk in the Public Sector

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💱 q-fin.GN
keywords projectsprojectriskaverageshowedcostdataduration
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Implementing large-scale information and communication technology (IT) projects carries large risks and easily might disrupt operations, waste taxpayers' money, and create negative publicity. Because of the high risks it is important that government leaders manage the attendant risks. We analysed a sample of 1,355 public sector IT projects. The sample included large-scale projects, on average the actual expenditure was $130 million and the average duration was 35 months. Our findings showed that the typical project had no cost overruns and took on average 24% longer than initially expected. However, comparing the risk distribution with the normative model of a thin-tailed distribution, projects' actual costs should fall within -30% and +25% of the budget in nearly 99 out of 100 projects. The data showed, however, that a staggering 18% of all projects are outliers with cost overruns >25%. Tests showed that the risk of outliers is even higher for standard software (24%) as well as in certain project types, e.g., data management (41%), office management (23%), eGovernment (21%) and management information systems (20%). Analysis showed also that projects duration adds risk: every additional year of project duration increases the average cost risk by 4.2 percentage points. Lastly, we suggest four solutions that public sector organization can take: (1) benchmark your organization to know where you are, (2) de-bias your IT project decision-making, (3) reduce the complexities of your IT projects, and (4) develop Masterbuilders to learn from the best in the field.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Why Network Segmentation Projects Fail

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Survey of 400 practitioners identifies four failure archetypes for network segmentation projects, with uniform preference for general IT project management fixes over segmentation-specific ones.