pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1408.2040 · v1 · submitted 2014-08-09 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Recognition: unknown

Prediction with Advice of Unknown Number of Experts

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords expertsnumbernominaladviceboundboundsdefensivedepends
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In the framework of prediction with expert advice, we consider a recently introduced kind of regret bounds: the bounds that depend on the effective instead of nominal number of experts. In contrast to the Normal- Hedge bound, which mainly depends on the effective number of experts but also weakly depends on the nominal one, we obtain a bound that does not contain the nominal number of experts at all. We use the defensive forecasting method and introduce an application of defensive forecasting to multivalued supermartingales.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Note on How to Remove the $\ln\ln T$ Term from the Squint Bound

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Shifted KT potentials equal a prior change in KT, and this removes the ln ln T factor from Squint's data-independent bound.