pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1504.05696 · v2 · submitted 2015-04-22 · 💻 cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

Ascribing Consciousness to Artificial Intelligence

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords consciousnessartificialhuman-levelintelligenceadoptedadvocatesanti-functionalistascribe
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper critically assesses the anti-functionalist stance on consciousness adopted by certain advocates of integrated information theory (IIT), a corollary of which is that human-level artificial intelligence implemented on conventional computing hardware is necessarily not conscious. The critique draws on variations of a well-known gradual neuronal replacement thought experiment, as well as bringing out tensions in IIT's treatment of self-knowledge. The aim, though, is neither to reject IIT outright nor to champion functionalism in particular. Rather, it is suggested that both ideas have something to offer a scientific understanding of consciousness, as long as they are not dressed up as solutions to illusory metaphysical problems. As for human-level AI, we must await its development before we can decide whether or not to ascribe consciousness to it.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AI and Consciousness: Shifting Focus Towards Tractable Questions

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Direct research on AI consciousness is intractable, so the field should prioritize studying perceived AI consciousness and its societal consequences.