Recognition: unknown
Ascribing Consciousness to Artificial Intelligence
read the original abstract
This paper critically assesses the anti-functionalist stance on consciousness adopted by certain advocates of integrated information theory (IIT), a corollary of which is that human-level artificial intelligence implemented on conventional computing hardware is necessarily not conscious. The critique draws on variations of a well-known gradual neuronal replacement thought experiment, as well as bringing out tensions in IIT's treatment of self-knowledge. The aim, though, is neither to reject IIT outright nor to champion functionalism in particular. Rather, it is suggested that both ideas have something to offer a scientific understanding of consciousness, as long as they are not dressed up as solutions to illusory metaphysical problems. As for human-level AI, we must await its development before we can decide whether or not to ascribe consciousness to it.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
AI and Consciousness: Shifting Focus Towards Tractable Questions
Direct research on AI consciousness is intractable, so the field should prioritize studying perceived AI consciousness and its societal consequences.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.