Recognition: unknown
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
read the original abstract
Understanding entailment and contradiction is fundamental to understanding natural language, and inference about entailment and contradiction is a valuable testing ground for the development of semantic representations. However, machine learning research in this area has been dramatically limited by the lack of large-scale resources. To address this, we introduce the Stanford Natural Language Inference corpus, a new, freely available collection of labeled sentence pairs, written by humans doing a novel grounded task based on image captioning. At 570K pairs, it is two orders of magnitude larger than all other resources of its type. This increase in scale allows lexicalized classifiers to outperform some sophisticated existing entailment models, and it allows a neural network-based model to perform competitively on natural language inference benchmarks for the first time.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddings
C-Pack releases a new Chinese embedding benchmark, large training dataset, and optimized models that outperform priors by up to 10% on C-MTEB while also delivering English SOTA results.
-
From Articles to Premises: Building PrimeFacts, an Extraction Methodology and Resource for Fact-Checking Evidence
PrimeFacts extracts decontextualized premises from fact-check articles, raising evidence retrieval MRR by up to 30% and verdict prediction Macro-F1 by 10-20 points over baselines.
-
Is Textual Similarity Invariant under Machine Translation? Evidence Based on the Political Manifesto Corpus
Machine translation preserves embedding similarity structure for ten languages but distorts it for four in the Manifesto Corpus, via a new non-inferiority testing framework.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.