pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1603.02418 · v1 · submitted 2016-03-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

Alignments of Radio Galaxies in Deep Radio Imaging of ELAIS N1

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords radioalignmentanglesangularpositiondistributionelaisspatial
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present a study of the distribution of radio jet position angles of radio galaxies over an area of 1 square degree in the ELAIS N1 field. ELAIS N1 was observed with the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope at 612 MHz to an rms noise level of 10 $\mu$Jy and angular resolution of $6"\times 5"$. The image contains 65 resolved radio galaxy jets. The spatial distribution reveals a prominent alignment of jet position angles along a "filament" of about 1$^{\circ}$. We examine the possibility that the apparent alignment arises from an underlying random distribution and find that the probability of chance alignment is less than 0.1%. An angular covariance analysis of the data indicates the presence of spatially coherence in position angles on scales $>0.5^{\circ}$. This angular scales translates to a co-moving scale of $>20h^{-1}$Mpc at a redshift of 1. The implied alignment of the spin axes of massive black holes that give rise the radio jets suggest the presence of large-scale spatial coherence in angular momentum. Our results reinforce prior evidence for large-scale spatial alignments of quasar optical polarisation position angles.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Directional Tests of the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation using Pantheon+ and BAO

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for directional anisotropy in the cosmic distance duality relation is found, yielding a robust 95% upper bound of 0.025 on the dipole amplitude after accounting for survey selection effects.