Recognition: unknown
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
read the original abstract
We propose a criterion for discrimination against a specified sensitive attribute in supervised learning, where the goal is to predict some target based on available features. Assuming data about the predictor, target, and membership in the protected group are available, we show how to optimally adjust any learned predictor so as to remove discrimination according to our definition. Our framework also improves incentives by shifting the cost of poor classification from disadvantaged groups to the decision maker, who can respond by improving the classification accuracy. In line with other studies, our notion is oblivious: it depends only on the joint statistics of the predictor, the target and the protected attribute, but not on interpretation of individualfeatures. We study the inherent limits of defining and identifying biases based on such oblivious measures, outlining what can and cannot be inferred from different oblivious tests. We illustrate our notion using a case study of FICO credit scores.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Fairness vs Performance: Characterizing the Pareto Frontier of Algorithmic Decision Systems
The Pareto frontier of fair algorithmic decisions consists of deterministic group-specific threshold rules on predicted success probabilities, which can include upper bounds for some fairness metrics and holds indepen...
-
Revisiting Fairness Impossibility with Endogenous Behavior
Error-rate balance and predictive parity become compatible under endogenous behavior by adjusting stakes differently across groups, introducing a new form of unequal treatment in consequences.
-
Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models
The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job...
-
FAIR_XAI: Improving Multimodal Foundation Model Fairness via Explainability for Wellbeing Assessment
Vision-language models for wellbeing assessment exhibit dataset-dependent performance and demographic biases, with explainability interventions providing inconsistent fairness gains at potential accuracy costs.
-
Man and machine: artificial intelligence and judicial decision making
A synthetic review across multiple fields concludes that AI decision aids have modest or nonexistent effects on judicial outcomes while identifying gaps in understanding human-AI interactions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.