Exploring Generalization in Deep Learning
read the original abstract
With a goal of understanding what drives generalization in deep networks, we consider several recently suggested explanations, including norm-based control, sharpness and robustness. We study how these measures can ensure generalization, highlighting the importance of scale normalization, and making a connection between sharpness and PAC-Bayes theory. We then investigate how well the measures explain different observed phenomena.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Sample Complexity of Scientific Discovery: PAC Learnability of Compositional Function Trees
Proves that Rademacher complexity of depth-d compositional trees over finite operator vocabulary is controlled by (K b L)^{d} / sqrt(n) under Lipschitz conditions on operators.
-
A Sharper Picture of Generalization in Transformers
Sparse low-degree Fourier spectra allow flat minima in transformers for boolean functions up to context-length sparsity, enabling non-vacuous PAC-Bayes generalization bounds via an idealized low-sharpness learner.
-
A Sharper Picture of Generalization in Transformers
PAC-Bayes applied to low-sharpness flat minima yields non-vacuous generalization bounds for boolean functions whose Fourier spectra are sparse and low-degree, with parameters estimable by property testing.
-
Feature Starvation as Geometric Instability in Sparse Autoencoders
Adaptive elastic net SAEs (AEN-SAEs) mitigate feature starvation in SAEs by combining ℓ2 structural stability with adaptive ℓ1 reweighting, producing a Lipschitz-continuous sparse coding map that recovers global featu...
-
Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement
Introduces a margin-adaptive confidence ranking method that learns an estimator from simulated diversity and derives margin-dependent generalization bounds for use in fixed-sequence testing of LLM-human agreement.
-
Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement
Develops a margin-adaptive learned confidence estimator for LLMs with generalization guarantees to improve agreement rates with human judgments over heuristic baselines.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.