Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Submodular Optimization for Consensus Networks with Noise-Corrupted Leaders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1712.08212 v1 pith:T3DP2OT5 submitted 2017-12-21 math.OC cs.SYeess.SY

Submodular Optimization for Consensus Networks with Noise-Corrupted Leaders

classification math.OC cs.SYeess.SY
keywords leaderperformancealgorithmsconsensusgreedyleadersnetworkselection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the leader selection problem in a network with consensus dynamics where both leader and follower agents are subject to stochastic external disturbances. The performance of the system is quantified by the total steady-state variance of the node states, and the goal is to identify the set of leaders that minimizes this variance. We first show that this performance measure can be expressed as a submodular set function over the nodes in the network. We then use this result to analyze the performance of two greedy, polynomial-time algorithms for leader selection, showing that the leader sets produced by the greedy algorithms are within provable bounds of optimal.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Much Does Correctness Cost? Budgeted Placement of Strong Correctors in a Weak Multi-Agent Swarm

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Heterogeneous cost-coupled corrector placement in a consensus swarm stays submodular, so cost-benefit greedy is near-optimal, and cost-quality curvature decides few-strong versus many-medium oracles in a task-dependent way.