Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Satisficing in Time-Sensitive Bandit Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.02855 v2 pith:RTWF4ZMP submitted 2018-03-07 cs.LG cs.AI

Satisficing in Time-Sensitive Bandit Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords satisficinglearningsamplingthompsonactionbanditinformationmuch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Much of the recent literature on bandit learning focuses on algorithms that aim to converge on an optimal action. One shortcoming is that this orientation does not account for time sensitivity, which can play a crucial role when learning an optimal action requires much more information than near-optimal ones. Indeed, popular approaches such as upper-confidence-bound methods and Thompson sampling can fare poorly in such situations. We consider instead learning a satisficing action, which is near-optimal while requiring less information, and propose satisficing Thompson sampling, an algorithm that serves this purpose. We establish a general bound on expected discounted regret and study the application of satisficing Thompson sampling to linear and infinite-armed bandits, demonstrating arbitrarily large benefits over Thompson sampling. We also discuss the relation between the notion of satisficing and the theory of rate distortion, which offers guidance on the selection of satisficing actions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Not all uncertainty is alike: volatility, stochasticity, and exploration

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Volatility promotes exploration and stochasticity suppresses it in Gaussian state-space bandits, shown by extending Gittins indices and deriving the CAUSE exploration bonus via control-as-inference.