pith. sign in

arxiv: 1810.05851 · v1 · pith:MPQPRUYPnew · submitted 2018-10-13 · 💻 cs.AI

Overview of CAIL2018: Legal Judgment Prediction Competition

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords cail2018competitionjudgmentoverviewcontestantsgivenlegalprediction
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we give an overview of the Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) competition at Chinese AI and Law challenge (CAIL2018). This competition focuses on LJP which aims to predict the judgment results according to the given facts. Specifically, in CAIL2018 , we proposed three subtasks of LJP for the contestants, i.e., predicting relevant law articles, charges and prison terms given the fact descriptions. CAIL2018 has attracted several hundreds participants (601 teams, 1, 144 contestants from 269 organizations). In this paper, we provide a detailed overview of the task definition, related works, outstanding methods and competition results in CAIL2018.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LegalWorld: A Life-Cycle Interactive Environment for Legal Agents

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LegalWorld is a life-cycle interactive environment modeling Chinese civil litigation as five causally connected stages grounded in 75,309 judgments, paired with LongJud-Bench for cross-stage agent evaluation.