Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Anatomy of a six-parameter fit to the $b\to s \ell^+\ell^-$ anomalies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.10793 v2 pith:6SYWBTDG submitted 2018-11-27 hep-ph hep-exphysics.data-an

classification hep-phhep-exphysics.data-an
keywords observablesmetricsbestdefineexamplefuturelevelmeasurements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Discrepancies between measurements of decay modes with an underlying quark level transition $b\to s \ell^+\ell^-$ and standard model (SM) predictions have persisted for several years, particularly for the muon channels. The inadequacy of the SM becomes more compelling in a global fit. For example, Ref. [1] described 175 observables by six parameters encoding new physics and quantified the disagreement with the SM at about the $5\sigma$ level. While certain one and two parameter fits have previously been considered in detail, we establish a framework for the detailed discussion of the full 6d fit. We visualize and quantify the 6d $1\sigma$ region around the best fit point and define fit uncertainties for both current and future observables. We then define metrics quantifying the deviations between measurements and both SM and best fit predictions. These metrics relate observables to directions in parameter space, revealing their precise role in the fit, thus providing guidance for future theoretical and experimental work. Some metrics further quantify the role of correlated uncertainties, which turns out to be significant. For example the relevance of angular observables such as $P_5^\prime$ is reduced in this context. Finally, studying the space of observables allows us to discuss the internal tensions in the fit.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fitting in or odd one out? Pulls vs residual responses in $b\to s \ell^+\ell^-$

    hep-ph 2019-08 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    The updated LHCb R_K measurement shifts the best-fit new physics in b→sμμ transitions toward smaller C10mu and reduces its uncertainty.

  2. Investigating New Physics through the Observables of Semileptonic $B_{s}\to K^{\ast}(\to K \pi)\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ Decay

    hep-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Model-independent calculation of differential branching ratio, forward-backward asymmetry, polarization, and angular coefficients in Bs → K* μ+μ- with 1D and 2D new physics scenarios in C7^NP, C9^(prime)NP, and C10^(p...

Pith tools