Recognition: unknown
Leptohadronic blazar models applied to the 2014-15 flare of TXS 0506+056
read the original abstract
We investigate whether the emission of neutrinos observed in 2014-15 from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 can be accommodated with leptohadronic multi-wavelength models of the source commonly adopted for the 2017 flare. While multi-wavelength data during the neutrino flare are sparse, the large number of neutrino events ($13\pm5$) challenges the missing activity in gamma rays. We illustrate that two to five neutrino events during the flare can be explained with leptohadronic models of different categories: a one-zone model, a compact core model, and an external radiation field model. If, however, significantly more events were to be accommodated, the predicted multi-wavelength emission levels would be in conflict with observational X-ray constraints, or with the high-energy gamma ray fluxes observed by the Fermi LAT, depending on the model. For example, while the external radiation field model can predict up to five neutrino events without violating X-ray constraints, the absorption of high-energy gamma rays is in minor tension with data. We therefore do not find any model that can simultaneously explain the high event number quoted by IceCube and the (sparse) electromagnetic data during the neutrino flare.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Unified Explanation of Gamma-Ray and Neutrino Spectra from Astrophysical Sources Based on the Gluon Condensation Model
The Gluon Condensation model fits gamma-ray spectra of TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068 with neutrino predictions consistent with IceCube, but predicts spectral hardening that disfavors it for SNR G54.1+0.3.
-
A Unified Explanation of Gamma-Ray and Neutrino Spectra from Astrophysical Sources Based on the Gluon Condensation Model
The Gluon Condensation model fits gamma-ray spectra of TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068 with neutrino predictions consistent with IceCube, but predicts unphysical hardening for SNR G54.1+0.3.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.