Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Knowledge Representation Learning: A Quantitative Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.10901 v1 pith:5DAXMHBY submitted 2018-12-28 cs.CL

Knowledge Representation Learning: A Quantitative Review

classification cs.CL
keywords knowledgegraphlearningquantitativerepresentationreviewtasksused
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge representation learning (KRL) aims to represent entities and relations in knowledge graph in low-dimensional semantic space, which have been widely used in massive knowledge-driven tasks. In this article, we introduce the reader to the motivations for KRL, and overview existing approaches for KRL. Afterwards, we extensively conduct and quantitative comparison and analysis of several typical KRL methods on three evaluation tasks of knowledge acquisition including knowledge graph completion, triple classification, and relation extraction. We also review the real-world applications of KRL, such as language modeling, question answering, information retrieval, and recommender systems. Finally, we discuss the remaining challenges and outlook the future directions for KRL. The codes and datasets used in the experiments can be found in https://github.com/thunlp/OpenKE.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DeLIVeR: Decomposed Learning for Information-grounded Veracity Recognition via Reinforced Knowledge Graph Exploration

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    DeLIVeR uses GRPO-trained question planning over knowledge graphs to report F1 83.7/84.6/79.7 on LIAR/FEVER/PolitiFact, claiming ~10-15% relative gains over HippoRAG2.

  2. A Survey on Semantic Communication for Vision: Categories, Frameworks, Enabling Techniques, and Applications

    eess.IV 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A survey that classifies visual semantic communication into preservation, expansion, and refinement categories and reviews their machine-learning components and applications.