pith. sign in

arxiv: 1910.07648 · v2 · pith:7JASEJEGnew · submitted 2019-10-16 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

Studies in Applying Machine Learning to LLRF and Resonance Control in Superconducting RF Cavities

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph
keywords controlcavitiesllrfresonanceapproachesimprovesystemscavity
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Superconducting Radio-Frequency (SRF) cavities operating in continuous wave (CW) mode and with low beam loading are devices characterized by a high loaded quality factor, in the order of 10^7, and narrow bandwidth, in the order of 10 Hz. The Low Level RF (LLRF) and resonance control systems of SRF cavities become a fundamental component of the entire system operation and in general has very tight stability requirements on the amplitude, phase and resonance frequency of the cavity. Microphonics plays an important role in cavity detuning, which results in more power needed to achieve the desired gradient. Active control approaches to reduce detuning in SRF cavities using piezoelectric actuators have shown promising results. Furthermore, Machine Learning (ML) techniques have also shown important capabilities to improve existing PID controllers. Specifically, Neural Networks (NN) can be used to find optimal PID gains and improve performance of traditional control systems. In this research, we develop new approaches to improve existing LLRF and resonance control systems with ML as a tool to find the optimal gains. We investigate these approaches using the LLRF control system intended for LCLS-II.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Learnable Loss Balancing and Transfer Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A PINN with learnable loss balancing and transfer learning predicts heat transfer in miniature heat sinks to under 8% error using only 87 data points, outperforming standard baselines.