Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AI Safety for High Energy Physics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.08606 v1 pith:O4CVKQUN submitted 2019-10-18 hep-ph cs.LGhep-exstat.ML

classification hep-phcs.LGhep-exstat.ML
keywords deeplearningphysicscurrentexperimentalparticularsafetytechniques
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The field of high-energy physics (HEP), along with many scientific disciplines, is currently experiencing a dramatic influx of new methodologies powered by modern machine learning techniques. Over the last few years, a growing body of HEP literature has focused on identifying promising applications of deep learning in particular, and more recently these techniques are starting to be realized in an increasing number of experimental measurements. The overall conclusion from this impressive and extensive set of studies is that rarer and more complex physics signatures can be identified with the new set of powerful tools from deep learning. However, there is an unstudied systematic risk associated with combining the traditional HEP workflow and deep learning with high-dimensional data. In particular, calibrating and validating the response of deep neural networks is in general not experimentally feasible, and therefore current methods may be biased in ways that are not covered by current uncertainty estimates. By borrowing ideas from AI safety, we illustrate these potential issues and propose a method to bound the size of unaccounted for uncertainty. In addition to providing a pragmatic diagnostic, this work will hopefully begin a dialogue within the community about the robust application of deep learning to experimental analyses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Contrastive Learning for Robust Representations of Neutrino Data

    hep-ex 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Contrastive pretraining on sparse voxel representations of simulated neutrino events yields classifiers substantially more stable than an augmented baseline under simulated detector parameter shifts.

Pith tools