REVIEW 1 cited by
Mobile Energy Requirements of the Upcoming NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Mobile Energy Requirements of the Upcoming NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards
read the original abstract
Standardization of Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) was started by NIST in 2016 and has proceeded to its second elimination round. The upcoming standards are intended to replace (or supplement) current RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) on all targets, including lightweight, embedded, and mobile systems. We present an energy requirement analysis based on extensive measurements of PQC candidate algorithms on a Cortex M4 - based reference platform. We relate computational (energy) costs of PQC algorithms to their data transmission costs which are expected to increase with new types of public keys and ciphertext messages. The energy, bandwidth, and latency needs of PQC algorithms span several orders of magnitude, which is substantial enough to impact battery life, user experience, and application protocol design. We propose metrics and guidelines for PQC algorithm usage in IoT and mobile systems based on our findings. Our evidence supports the view that fast structured-lattice PQC schemes are the preferred choice for cloud-connected mobile devices in most use cases, even when per-bit data transmission energy cost is relatively high.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Benchmarking NIST-Standardised ML-KEM and ML-DSA on ARM Cortex-M0+: Performance, Memory, and Energy on the RP2040
ML-KEM-512 finishes a full key exchange in 35.7 ms using 2.83 mJ on the RP2040 at 133 MHz, 17 times faster than ECDH P-256, with open-source code for all levels of both algorithms.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.