REVIEW 2 cited by
Invertible Generative Modeling using Linear Rational Splines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Invertible Generative Modeling using Linear Rational Splines
read the original abstract
Normalizing flows attempt to model an arbitrary probability distribution through a set of invertible mappings. These transformations are required to achieve a tractable Jacobian determinant that can be used in high-dimensional scenarios. The first normalizing flow designs used coupling layer mappings built upon affine transformations. The significant advantage of such models is their easy-to-compute inverse. Nevertheless, making use of affine transformations may limit the expressiveness of such models. Recently, invertible piecewise polynomial functions as a replacement for affine transformations have attracted attention. However, these methods require solving a polynomial equation to calculate their inverse. In this paper, we explore using linear rational splines as a replacement for affine transformations used in coupling layers. Besides having a straightforward inverse, inference and generation have similar cost and architecture in this method. Moreover, simulation results demonstrate the competitiveness of this approach's performance compared to existing methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cluster Mass Inference from Galaxy Kinematics
Simulation-based Deep Sets model with neural posterior estimation halves scatter in cluster mass estimates from galaxy kinematics compared to the M-sigma relation.
-
Analytic Bijections for Smooth and Interpretable Normalizing Flows
Three new analytic bijections and a radial flow architecture give globally smooth, closed-form invertible normalizing flows that match or beat spline baselines on benchmarks and improve phi^4 lattice-field sampling.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.