Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.00388 v4 pith:FE3YGUUY submitted 2020-02-02 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords knowledgegraphresearchgraphsacquisitionrepresentationtopicsapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human knowledge provides a formal understanding of the world. Knowledge graphs that represent structural relations between entities have become an increasingly popular research direction towards cognition and human-level intelligence. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of knowledge graph covering overall research topics about 1) knowledge graph representation learning, 2) knowledge acquisition and completion, 3) temporal knowledge graph, and 4) knowledge-aware applications, and summarize recent breakthroughs and perspective directions to facilitate future research. We propose a full-view categorization and new taxonomies on these topics. Knowledge graph embedding is organized from four aspects of representation space, scoring function, encoding models, and auxiliary information. For knowledge acquisition, especially knowledge graph completion, embedding methods, path inference, and logical rule reasoning, are reviewed. We further explore several emerging topics, including meta relational learning, commonsense reasoning, and temporal knowledge graphs. To facilitate future research on knowledge graphs, we also provide a curated collection of datasets and open-source libraries on different tasks. In the end, we have a thorough outlook on several promising research directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FAIR GraphRAG: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Approach for Semantic Data Analysis

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Embedding FAIR Digital Objects as graph nodes yields a GraphRAG system that measurably improves accuracy, coverage and explainability on biomedical RNA-seq queries versus a non-FAIR baseline.

  2. SMART: Relation-Aware Learning of Geometric Representations for Knowledge Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SMART learns which elementary geometric transformation best fits each knowledge-graph relation and assigns that transformation per relation, with results comparable to leading embedding baselines.

  3. Do LLMs Dream of Discrete Algorithms?

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a neurosymbolic LLM agent that plans via Prolog predicates, but presents no experiments to back its claims of improved precision and coverage on DABStep.

  4. Graph Collaborative Attention Network for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    GCAT is presented as a new graph attention model for knowledge graph link prediction, but its equations are those of KBGAT and its reported benchmark numbers do not support the stated performance claims.

Pith tools