Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Human-centered Explainable AI: Towards a Reflective Sociotechnical Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.01092 v2 pith:NJ2CZP3I submitted 2020-02-04 cs.HC cs.AI

Human-centered Explainable AI: Towards a Reflective Sociotechnical Approach

classification cs.HC cs.AI
keywords humanapproachdesignhcxaireflectivesociotechnicalsystemsunderstanding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Explanations--a form of post-hoc interpretability--play an instrumental role in making systems accessible as AI continues to proliferate complex and sensitive sociotechnical systems. In this paper, we introduce Human-centered Explainable AI (HCXAI) as an approach that puts the human at the center of technology design. It develops a holistic understanding of "who" the human is by considering the interplay of values, interpersonal dynamics, and the socially situated nature of AI systems. In particular, we advocate for a reflective sociotechnical approach. We illustrate HCXAI through a case study of an explanation system for non-technical end-users that shows how technical advancements and the understanding of human factors co-evolve. Building on the case study, we lay out open research questions pertaining to further refining our understanding of "who" the human is and extending beyond 1-to-1 human-computer interactions. Finally, we propose that a reflective HCXAI paradigm-mediated through the perspective of Critical Technical Practice and supplemented with strategies from HCI, such as value-sensitive design and participatory design--not only helps us understand our intellectual blind spots, but it can also open up new design and research spaces.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Role to Person: Trust Calibration Challenges in Twin Agents

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Twin agents as personal digital representations create distinct trust calibration challenges because they dissolve the boundary between AI and human decision-makers, unlike existing frameworks designed for clear separation.

  2. XPlainVerse: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Explainable Deepfake Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    A million-scale deepfake benchmark with Edit-Check filtering, dual expert/lay explanations, and EntityScore/EvidenceScore shows fine-tuned detectors collapse under generator shift while surface fluency remains.