Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:5C7AY3FNrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
We reveal critical insights into problems of bias in state-of-the-art facial recognition (FR) systems using a novel Balanced Faces In the Wild (BFW) dataset: data balanced for gender and ethnic groups. We show variations in the optimal scoring threshold for face-pairs across different subgroups. Thus, the conventional approach of learning a global threshold for all pairs resulting in performance gaps among subgroups. By learning subgroup-specific thresholds, we not only mitigate problems in performance gaps but also show a notable boost in the overall performance. Furthermore, we do a human evaluation to measure the bias in humans, which supports the hypothesis that such a bias exists in human perception. For the BFW database, source code, and more, visit github.com/visionjo/facerec-bias-bfw.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Adaptive Calibration for Fair and Performant Facial Recognition
Adaptive Calibration maps cosine similarities to probabilities using local context, improving accuracy and fairness in facial recognition without demographic metadata.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.