Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.10118 v2 pith:4HQZCYE7 submitted 2020-02-24 stat.ML cs.LG

Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networks

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords bayesianrelunetworksapproximateapproximationapproximationsbeencalibrated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The point estimates of ReLU classification networks---arguably the most widely used neural network architecture---have been shown to yield arbitrarily high confidence far away from the training data. This architecture, in conjunction with a maximum a posteriori estimation scheme, is thus not calibrated nor robust. Approximate Bayesian inference has been empirically demonstrated to improve predictive uncertainty in neural networks, although the theoretical analysis of such Bayesian approximations is limited. We theoretically analyze approximate Gaussian distributions on the weights of ReLU networks and show that they fix the overconfidence problem. Furthermore, we show that even a simplistic, thus cheap, Bayesian approximation, also fixes these issues. This indicates that a sufficient condition for a calibrated uncertainty on a ReLU network is "to be a bit Bayesian". These theoretical results validate the usage of last-layer Bayesian approximation and motivate a range of a fidelity-cost trade-off. We further validate these findings empirically via various standard experiments using common deep ReLU networks and Laplace approximations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A 65 nm Multi-Modal Bayesian Inference Engine with 16.3 fJ/Sample Calibration-Free GRNG for Risk-Aware At-Home Skin Lesion Screening

    cs.AR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A 65 nm compute-in-memory multimodal Bayesian inference engine with calibration-free GRNG achieves 1.4x equal-risk coverage, >1.5x perturbation robustness, 5.5x process-variation resilience, and 1.8% higher balanced a...

  2. Covariance Last-Layer Ensembles: Function-Space Diversity for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Cov-LLE decorrelates member activations in function space, recovering substantial deep-ensemble diversity and calibration at 1× backbone cost, and a direction score repairs OC near-OOD detection.

  3. AGNFormer I: Reconstruction of AGN spectra using a probabilistic transformer model

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    An uncertainty-aware transformer reconstructs masked AGN broad lines and spectral halves with 4-16% flux errors and beats eleven purpose-built Lyα-reconstruction algorithms on a blind benchmark.

  4. Low Rank Based Subspace Inference for the Laplace Approximation of Bayesian Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives optimal low-rank subspace for Laplace approx in BNNs, provides scalable outperforming version, and new comparison metric.

  5. A 65 nm Multi-Modal Bayesian Inference Engine with 16.3 fJ/Sample Calibration-Free GRNG for Risk-Aware At-Home Skin Lesion Screening

    cs.AR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A 65 nm compute-in-memory chip implements multi-modal Bayesian neural networks with a calibration-free GRNG to deliver risk-aware skin lesion screening with reported gains in coverage, robustness, and efficiency over ...